{"title":"Relationship between gait asymmetry and time since amputation in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation","authors":"Takeshi Hara , Genki Hisano , Toshiki Kobayashi , Hélène Pillet , Ryota Morishima , Yukihiko Mizuno , Hiroaki Hobara","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although time since amputation (TSAmp) is recognized as a primary factor influencing the walking ability of individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (uTFA), the specific effects of TSAmp on gait asymmetry remain insufficiently investigated. This study aimed to clarify whether gait asymmetry decrease with longer TSAmp across a range of walking speeds. Thirty individuals with uTFA, classified as K-3 and K-4 functional levels, participated in this study. Participants walked at eight speeds (ranging from 2.0 to 5.5 km/h in increments of 0.5 km/h) on an instrumented treadmill. Spatiotemporal parameters and peak values of ground reaction forces (GRFs), including anteroposterior, mediolateral, and vertical components, were measured to calculate the asymmetry ratio. Linear regression analyses were subsequently conducted to examine the relationships between TSAmp, TSAmp/Age (age-normalized TSAmp), and the asymmetry ratio. The results demonstrated no significant correlations between TSAmp, TSAmp/Age, and the asymmetry ratio across all measured parameters and walking speeds. These findings suggest that TSAmp and TSAmp/Age exhibit weak associations with gait asymmetry in terms of spatiotemporal parameters and peak GRFs. The results of the present study suggest that neither TSAmp nor TSAmp/Age are necessarily associated with gait asymmetry. Therefore, predicting gait asymmetry in individuals with uTFA based solely on TSAmp is not feasible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 112622"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025001332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although time since amputation (TSAmp) is recognized as a primary factor influencing the walking ability of individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (uTFA), the specific effects of TSAmp on gait asymmetry remain insufficiently investigated. This study aimed to clarify whether gait asymmetry decrease with longer TSAmp across a range of walking speeds. Thirty individuals with uTFA, classified as K-3 and K-4 functional levels, participated in this study. Participants walked at eight speeds (ranging from 2.0 to 5.5 km/h in increments of 0.5 km/h) on an instrumented treadmill. Spatiotemporal parameters and peak values of ground reaction forces (GRFs), including anteroposterior, mediolateral, and vertical components, were measured to calculate the asymmetry ratio. Linear regression analyses were subsequently conducted to examine the relationships between TSAmp, TSAmp/Age (age-normalized TSAmp), and the asymmetry ratio. The results demonstrated no significant correlations between TSAmp, TSAmp/Age, and the asymmetry ratio across all measured parameters and walking speeds. These findings suggest that TSAmp and TSAmp/Age exhibit weak associations with gait asymmetry in terms of spatiotemporal parameters and peak GRFs. The results of the present study suggest that neither TSAmp nor TSAmp/Age are necessarily associated with gait asymmetry. Therefore, predicting gait asymmetry in individuals with uTFA based solely on TSAmp is not feasible.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.