Quantification of nine phthalate esters in a plastic sample using relative molar sensitivities obtained by gas chromatography post-column reaction flame ionization detection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

IF 4 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Yuko Kitamaki, Satoko Otsuka, Toshihide Ihara, Nobuyasu Itoh
{"title":"Quantification of nine phthalate esters in a plastic sample using relative molar sensitivities obtained by gas chromatography post-column reaction flame ionization detection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry","authors":"Yuko Kitamaki,&nbsp;Satoko Otsuka,&nbsp;Toshihide Ihara,&nbsp;Nobuyasu Itoh","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2025.465867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (GC–MS) has been commonly used in various analytical fields because of its high selectivity and sensitivity; however, for reliable quantification, this method requires a calibrant for each target. By contrast, GC combined with post-column reaction flame ionization detection (-r-FID) can quantify all organic compounds from a single reference on the basis of their number of carbons, which is attributed to the conversion of organic compounds into methane after separation; however, it is not suitable for matrix extracts because GC-r-FID detects all carbon-containing compounds injected into the GC. In this study, we developed a novel method for the reliable quantification of target analytes by combining GC/MS and GC-r-FID. The relative molar sensitivity (RMS) of each target analyte was obtained beforehand from the responses of GC–MS and GC-r-FID using calibration solutions, and each target analyte in matrix-extracts was quantified from the GC–MS responses and RMS. Because the reliability of RMS is important in this method, we examined the reliability of RMS as the first step. We then applied the developed method and verified it by quantifying nine phthalate esters in a matrix-type certified reference material (NMIJ CRM 8152-a, phthalate esters in polyvinyl chloride resin). The analytical results obtained using this method were comparable to those obtained using the conventional method (internal standard method) and those certified or information values. Since RMS can be obtained using common reagents, this method should be suitable for the reliable quantification of target analytes even when corresponding reference materials are not available.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography A","volume":"1748 ","pages":"Article 465867"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967325002158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (GC–MS) has been commonly used in various analytical fields because of its high selectivity and sensitivity; however, for reliable quantification, this method requires a calibrant for each target. By contrast, GC combined with post-column reaction flame ionization detection (-r-FID) can quantify all organic compounds from a single reference on the basis of their number of carbons, which is attributed to the conversion of organic compounds into methane after separation; however, it is not suitable for matrix extracts because GC-r-FID detects all carbon-containing compounds injected into the GC. In this study, we developed a novel method for the reliable quantification of target analytes by combining GC/MS and GC-r-FID. The relative molar sensitivity (RMS) of each target analyte was obtained beforehand from the responses of GC–MS and GC-r-FID using calibration solutions, and each target analyte in matrix-extracts was quantified from the GC–MS responses and RMS. Because the reliability of RMS is important in this method, we examined the reliability of RMS as the first step. We then applied the developed method and verified it by quantifying nine phthalate esters in a matrix-type certified reference material (NMIJ CRM 8152-a, phthalate esters in polyvinyl chloride resin). The analytical results obtained using this method were comparable to those obtained using the conventional method (internal standard method) and those certified or information values. Since RMS can be obtained using common reagents, this method should be suitable for the reliable quantification of target analytes even when corresponding reference materials are not available.
用气相色谱柱后反应火焰电离检测和气相色谱-质谱法获得的相对摩尔灵敏度定量塑料样品中的9种邻苯二甲酸酯
气相色谱-质谱联用技术因其高选择性和高灵敏度而广泛应用于各种分析领域;然而,为了实现可靠的定量,该方法需要对每个目标都使用一种校准剂。相比之下,气相色谱结合柱后反应火焰电离检测(-r-FID)可以根据碳数从单个参考物中定量所有有机化合物,这归因于有机化合物在分离后转化为甲烷;但是,由于GC-r- fid可以检测进气相色谱的所有含碳化合物,因此不适合用于基质提取物。在本研究中,我们建立了一种将GC/MS和GC-r- fid相结合的可靠的目标分析物定量方法。利用标定液通过GC-MS和GC-r-FID测定各目标分析物的相对摩尔灵敏度(RMS),通过GC-MS和RMS测定基质提取物中各目标分析物的相对摩尔灵敏度。由于均方根值的可靠性在该方法中很重要,因此我们首先对均方根值的可靠性进行检验。然后,我们应用开发的方法,并通过在基质型认证标准物质(NMIJ CRM 8152-a,聚氯乙烯树脂中的邻苯二甲酸酯)中定量9种邻苯二甲酸酯进行验证。用该方法得到的分析结果与常规方法(内标法)和经认证或信息值的分析结果具有可比性。由于使用普通试剂可获得均方根值,因此即使没有相应的标准物质,该方法也应适用于目标分析物的可靠定量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal of Chromatography A 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
14.60%
发文量
742
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation, and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Contributions consist mainly of research papers dealing with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信