Decomposing sand mining complexities to chart ocean sustainability narratives and pathways in the coastal zones of Africa

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Matovu Baker , Raimund Bleischwitz , Isaac Lukambagire , Linda A Etta , Bernard Lutalo
{"title":"Decomposing sand mining complexities to chart ocean sustainability narratives and pathways in the coastal zones of Africa","authors":"Matovu Baker ,&nbsp;Raimund Bleischwitz ,&nbsp;Isaac Lukambagire ,&nbsp;Linda A Etta ,&nbsp;Bernard Lutalo","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coastal zones/states of Africa are some of the leading sand-mining and exporting spots globally, a conduit for lucrative socioeconomic transformation. Unfortunately, in Africa, as with most emerging economies, sand mining benefits have not yielded comprehensive socioecological benefits. Rather, sand mining and trade have spiraled into negative externalities that cataclysmically scupper socioecological systems and ocean sustainability targets. The lack of coherent sand mining governance mechanisms and increasing natural resource contestations, proliferated by bumper global sand demand, have further created dire sustainability indicators/ramifications. The externalities have explosive negative effects on coastal and marine ecosystems that sustain livelihoods. These have spilled into unsustainable socioecological outcomes,cremating the avenues for realizing Agenda 2063 of Africa's Ocean Decade and sustainable actions, necessitating urgent redress. This study digs deeper into the literature on sand mining in Africa to kickstart new epochs for sustainable sand mining in Africa that are replicable. A systematic literature review of 2514 peer-reviewed articles and 15 grey literature, including policy documents and reports on sand mining, were explored and analyzed using a bibliometric analysis technique. A bibliometric analysis entailed the uncovering of three key issues (i) sand mining research and policy trends/directions in Africa, including their complexity in tandem with the sustainability trilogy (ii) ramifications of the current sand mining landscape to/on ocean sustainability pillars (social, economic, institutional, scientific &amp;environmental) and (iii) thematic mapping/analysis to highlight the current governance mechanisms (including sustainability issues/gaps therein). Findings revealed that Africa's coastal states are some of the leading sand exporters but lose most of their revenue by reimporting sand from middle or high-income states. Research on sand mining has receded. If it exists, it is led by a few countries and western (developed/richer) institutions/scholars. Increasing sand mining is associated with increase in socioecological vulnerabilities. Africa's coastal regions experiencing unsustainable sand mining are losing critical natural and social livelihood capitals. Governance mechanisms are unsustainable. Few powerful actors (including an emerging network of African oligarchs and foreign companies/individuals), operate or manage the sand-mining value chains. There is limited understanding of the environmental, social, and governance nexus and its relationship to local and global development targets. To chart/regurgitate sustainable narratives for sustainable sand mining, a new pathway called the SSMAP (Sustainable Sand Mining Action Pathway) that has five key interrelated steps has been developed. Localizing the SSMAP and incorporating emerging co-governance pathways in micro-settings could help identify leverage points for collaborative and voluntary engagements/governance on sand mining. Scaling up the SSMAP (micro to macro levels) could help build evidence-based inventories and transformative options to co-design coherent transnational governance mechanisms. Such mechanisms could bolster the monitoring of sand mining, legitimize sustainable sand mining operations and value chains, and lay the foundations for better coastal socioecological livelihood and development indicators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101646"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25000358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal zones/states of Africa are some of the leading sand-mining and exporting spots globally, a conduit for lucrative socioeconomic transformation. Unfortunately, in Africa, as with most emerging economies, sand mining benefits have not yielded comprehensive socioecological benefits. Rather, sand mining and trade have spiraled into negative externalities that cataclysmically scupper socioecological systems and ocean sustainability targets. The lack of coherent sand mining governance mechanisms and increasing natural resource contestations, proliferated by bumper global sand demand, have further created dire sustainability indicators/ramifications. The externalities have explosive negative effects on coastal and marine ecosystems that sustain livelihoods. These have spilled into unsustainable socioecological outcomes,cremating the avenues for realizing Agenda 2063 of Africa's Ocean Decade and sustainable actions, necessitating urgent redress. This study digs deeper into the literature on sand mining in Africa to kickstart new epochs for sustainable sand mining in Africa that are replicable. A systematic literature review of 2514 peer-reviewed articles and 15 grey literature, including policy documents and reports on sand mining, were explored and analyzed using a bibliometric analysis technique. A bibliometric analysis entailed the uncovering of three key issues (i) sand mining research and policy trends/directions in Africa, including their complexity in tandem with the sustainability trilogy (ii) ramifications of the current sand mining landscape to/on ocean sustainability pillars (social, economic, institutional, scientific &environmental) and (iii) thematic mapping/analysis to highlight the current governance mechanisms (including sustainability issues/gaps therein). Findings revealed that Africa's coastal states are some of the leading sand exporters but lose most of their revenue by reimporting sand from middle or high-income states. Research on sand mining has receded. If it exists, it is led by a few countries and western (developed/richer) institutions/scholars. Increasing sand mining is associated with increase in socioecological vulnerabilities. Africa's coastal regions experiencing unsustainable sand mining are losing critical natural and social livelihood capitals. Governance mechanisms are unsustainable. Few powerful actors (including an emerging network of African oligarchs and foreign companies/individuals), operate or manage the sand-mining value chains. There is limited understanding of the environmental, social, and governance nexus and its relationship to local and global development targets. To chart/regurgitate sustainable narratives for sustainable sand mining, a new pathway called the SSMAP (Sustainable Sand Mining Action Pathway) that has five key interrelated steps has been developed. Localizing the SSMAP and incorporating emerging co-governance pathways in micro-settings could help identify leverage points for collaborative and voluntary engagements/governance on sand mining. Scaling up the SSMAP (micro to macro levels) could help build evidence-based inventories and transformative options to co-design coherent transnational governance mechanisms. Such mechanisms could bolster the monitoring of sand mining, legitimize sustainable sand mining operations and value chains, and lay the foundations for better coastal socioecological livelihood and development indicators.
分解采砂的复杂性,绘制海洋可持续发展的叙事和路径在非洲沿海地区
非洲沿海地区/国家是全球一些主要的采砂和出口地点,是利润丰厚的社会经济转型的渠道。不幸的是,在非洲,与大多数新兴经济体一样,采砂效益并没有产生全面的社会生态效益。相反,采砂和贸易已经演变成负面的外部性,灾难性地破坏了社会生态系统和海洋可持续性目标。由于缺乏连贯的采砂治理机制,加上全球沙子需求激增,自然资源竞争日益加剧,进一步造成了可怕的可持续性指标/后果。外部性对维持生计的沿海和海洋生态系统产生爆炸性负面影响。这些问题已造成不可持续的社会生态后果,使实现《2063年非洲海洋十年议程》和采取可持续行动的途径化为火化,需要紧急补救。本研究深入研究了非洲采砂的文献,以启动非洲可持续采砂的新时代,这是可复制的。采用文献计量分析方法,对2514篇同行评议论文和15篇灰色文献(包括采砂政策文件和报告)进行了系统的文献综述和分析。文献计量分析需要揭示三个关键问题:(1)非洲的采砂研究和政策趋势/方向,包括它们与可持续性三部曲相结合的复杂性;(2)当前采砂景观对海洋可持续性支柱(社会、经济、体制、科学和环境)的影响;(3)专题制图/分析,以突出当前的治理机制(包括可持续性问题/其中的差距)。调查结果显示,非洲沿海国家是一些主要的沙子出口国,但他们的大部分收入都是通过从中等或高收入国家重新进口沙子而损失的。采砂研究已经退步。如果它存在,它是由少数国家和西方(发达/富裕)机构/学者领导的。采砂活动的增加与社会生态脆弱性的增加有关。非洲沿海地区正在经历不可持续的采砂,正在失去重要的自然和社会生计资本。治理机制不可持续。很少有强大的行动者(包括新兴的非洲寡头和外国公司/个人网络)经营或管理采砂价值链。人们对环境、社会和治理的联系及其与地方和全球发展目标的关系了解有限。为了描绘可持续采砂的可持续叙事,一个名为SSMAP(可持续采砂行动路径)的新途径已经开发出来,它有五个关键的相互关联的步骤。将SSMAP本地化,并在微观环境中纳入新兴的共同治理途径,有助于确定采砂合作和自愿参与/治理的杠杆点。扩大SSMAP(从微观到宏观层面)可以帮助建立基于证据的清单和变革性选择,以共同设计连贯的跨国治理机制。这种机制可以加强对采砂的监测,使可持续采砂作业和价值链合法化,并为改善沿海社会生态生计和发展指标奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信