Clustering method and stimulus presentation order shift sweet liking phenotype distributions

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Robin M. Tucker , Sze-Yen Tan , Aubrey DuBois , Emily J. Mayhew
{"title":"Clustering method and stimulus presentation order shift sweet liking phenotype distributions","authors":"Robin M. Tucker ,&nbsp;Sze-Yen Tan ,&nbsp;Aubrey DuBois ,&nbsp;Emily J. Mayhew","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sweet liking is a phenotype with an intuitive connection to nutrition and health, but phenotyping methods and association with health outcomes reported in the literature are highly variable. Recently, a “Rapid Method” of phenotyping based on 1 M sucrose solution liking was proposed, but validation of this method in new subject groups is needed. This study compared sweet liking phenotyping methods against 3 reliability criteria. Participants (<em>n</em> = 92, aged 18–55 years) rated their liking of both a 5-concentration series of sucrose solutions and a stand-alone 1 M sucrose solution. Participants were classified as sweet likers, sweet dislikers, or inverted U-shape using 7 hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) linkage methods, the Rapid Method, and a method based on the slope of the liking-sucrose concentration function (“Slope Method”). The proportion of sweet likers, defined as members of the cluster with the highest mean 1 M sucrose liking, varied widely from 1 % to 48 % depending on HCA method; in comparison, the Rapid and Slope methods classified 39 % and 51 % of participants as sweet likers, respectively. Liking for sucrose solutions decreased systematically across presentations (<em>p</em> = 0.00046); 63 % of participants who rated the 1 M solution first met the Rapid Method cut-off for sweet likers compared to 39 % of participants who rated it last. The Slope Method achieved the highest intragroup correlations while reproducing the commonly recognized phenotypes, but performance of the Rapid Method is strong enough to warrant its continued use when convenience is of paramount importance. Replication in larger cohorts is needed to validate these results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105509"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000849","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sweet liking is a phenotype with an intuitive connection to nutrition and health, but phenotyping methods and association with health outcomes reported in the literature are highly variable. Recently, a “Rapid Method” of phenotyping based on 1 M sucrose solution liking was proposed, but validation of this method in new subject groups is needed. This study compared sweet liking phenotyping methods against 3 reliability criteria. Participants (n = 92, aged 18–55 years) rated their liking of both a 5-concentration series of sucrose solutions and a stand-alone 1 M sucrose solution. Participants were classified as sweet likers, sweet dislikers, or inverted U-shape using 7 hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) linkage methods, the Rapid Method, and a method based on the slope of the liking-sucrose concentration function (“Slope Method”). The proportion of sweet likers, defined as members of the cluster with the highest mean 1 M sucrose liking, varied widely from 1 % to 48 % depending on HCA method; in comparison, the Rapid and Slope methods classified 39 % and 51 % of participants as sweet likers, respectively. Liking for sucrose solutions decreased systematically across presentations (p = 0.00046); 63 % of participants who rated the 1 M solution first met the Rapid Method cut-off for sweet likers compared to 39 % of participants who rated it last. The Slope Method achieved the highest intragroup correlations while reproducing the commonly recognized phenotypes, but performance of the Rapid Method is strong enough to warrant its continued use when convenience is of paramount importance. Replication in larger cohorts is needed to validate these results.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信