Surgical ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Leo Noanh Consoli , Eren Cetinel , Mir Wajid Majeed , Pawel Lajczak , Ilias Georgios Koziakas , Prajna Wijaya , Alexandros Apostolou , Raheel Ahmed , Konstantinos Perreas
{"title":"Surgical ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Leo Noanh Consoli ,&nbsp;Eren Cetinel ,&nbsp;Mir Wajid Majeed ,&nbsp;Pawel Lajczak ,&nbsp;Ilias Georgios Koziakas ,&nbsp;Prajna Wijaya ,&nbsp;Alexandros Apostolou ,&nbsp;Raheel Ahmed ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Perreas","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) are common conditions that often coexist, with about 25% of patients in NYHA classes I-II having AF. Efficacy and safety of surgical ablation (SA) in this population remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We aimed to perform a single-arm <em>meta</em>-analysis to assess the outcomes of standalone and concomitant SA in adult patients with AF and LVD. We searched PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. Endpoints of interest were maintenance of sinus rhythm, freedom from anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) use, change in LVEF, 30-day mortality, 1 year mortality and major procedural complications. We calculated pooled proportions or means for binary and continuous endpoints, respectively, with a 95 % confidence interval (CI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten observational studies comprising 863 patients (mean follow-up of 19 months) were included. At 1 year, SA resulted in a sinus rhythm rate of 83.9 % (95 % CI: 69.5–92.3); freedom from AAD use of 81.6 % (95 % CI: 64.7–91.7); and mortality of 5.77 (95 % CI:3.7–8.9). 30-day mortality was 2.16 % (95 % CI: 0.9–4.9); major complications 16.73 % (95 % CI: 12–23); and an improvement in LVEF of 12 % (95 % CI: 9–17).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This <em>meta</em>-analysis found that SA appears to be an effective strategy to achieve sinus rhythm in patients with AF and LVD, with a pooled 30-day mortality of 2.2%. Comparative studies are warranted to evaluate the relative safety and efficacy of SA compared with other rhythm control strategies in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101648"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235290672500051X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) are common conditions that often coexist, with about 25% of patients in NYHA classes I-II having AF. Efficacy and safety of surgical ablation (SA) in this population remains unclear.

Methods

We aimed to perform a single-arm meta-analysis to assess the outcomes of standalone and concomitant SA in adult patients with AF and LVD. We searched PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. Endpoints of interest were maintenance of sinus rhythm, freedom from anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) use, change in LVEF, 30-day mortality, 1 year mortality and major procedural complications. We calculated pooled proportions or means for binary and continuous endpoints, respectively, with a 95 % confidence interval (CI).

Results

Ten observational studies comprising 863 patients (mean follow-up of 19 months) were included. At 1 year, SA resulted in a sinus rhythm rate of 83.9 % (95 % CI: 69.5–92.3); freedom from AAD use of 81.6 % (95 % CI: 64.7–91.7); and mortality of 5.77 (95 % CI:3.7–8.9). 30-day mortality was 2.16 % (95 % CI: 0.9–4.9); major complications 16.73 % (95 % CI: 12–23); and an improvement in LVEF of 12 % (95 % CI: 9–17).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis found that SA appears to be an effective strategy to achieve sinus rhythm in patients with AF and LVD, with a pooled 30-day mortality of 2.2%. Comparative studies are warranted to evaluate the relative safety and efficacy of SA compared with other rhythm control strategies in this population.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信