Polyvinyl Alcohol Sponges Reduce Intraperitoneal Adhesions After Abdominal Surgery

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Donna C. Koo MD , P. Nina Scalise MD , Claire A. Ostertag-Hill MD , Abbie E. Naus MD , Jonathan M. Durgin MD , Megan Z. Chiu MD , Melissa Mejia Bautista MD , Kamila Moskowitzova MD , Steven J. Staffa MS , Gabriel Ramos Gonzalez MD , Alyaa Al-Ibraheemi MD , Eliza J. Lee MD , Farokh R. Demehri MD , Heung Bae Kim MD
{"title":"Polyvinyl Alcohol Sponges Reduce Intraperitoneal Adhesions After Abdominal Surgery","authors":"Donna C. Koo MD ,&nbsp;P. Nina Scalise MD ,&nbsp;Claire A. Ostertag-Hill MD ,&nbsp;Abbie E. Naus MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Durgin MD ,&nbsp;Megan Z. Chiu MD ,&nbsp;Melissa Mejia Bautista MD ,&nbsp;Kamila Moskowitzova MD ,&nbsp;Steven J. Staffa MS ,&nbsp;Gabriel Ramos Gonzalez MD ,&nbsp;Alyaa Al-Ibraheemi MD ,&nbsp;Eliza J. Lee MD ,&nbsp;Farokh R. Demehri MD ,&nbsp;Heung Bae Kim MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The use of cotton sponges in the operating room has been linked to intraperitoneal adhesion formation. Inert, nonlinting polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) sponges have been used as an alternative to reduce intraoperative tissue trauma and particle remnants in other surgical fields. We investigate the effect of PVA sponges on reducing postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions in a murine model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and methods</h3><div>In total, 189 C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into three groups by abdominal packing intervention. Following laparotomy on day 0, the abdominal cavity was packed with cotton gauze (<em>n</em> = 53), PVA wipe (<em>n</em> = 54), or no packing (sham; <em>n</em> = 58) for three rounds of 10 min each before packing was removed. Mice were euthanized, and necropsies were performed between postoperative days 13-15. Adhesions were graded by two blinded observers using a validated system composed of adhesion extent, tenacity, and density. Adhesion scores were compared between the three groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to adhesions in gauze-packed mice, adhesions in PVA-packed mice were significantly less extensive, less tenacious, and less dense (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for all), which equated to lower total adhesion scores in PVA-packed mice (0 [0, 3] <em>versus</em> 5 [2, 7], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The adhesion scores for sham group mice were significantly lower than PVA and gauze mice in all categories.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This is the first study to directly compare postoperative intra-abdominal adhesion formation following the use of gauze and PVA sponges in an animal model. PVA sponges significantly reduce postoperative adhesions when compared to standard cotton gauze sponges. PVA should be further explored as a useful alternative to reduce postoperative adhesion-related morbidity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 183-192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425000642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The use of cotton sponges in the operating room has been linked to intraperitoneal adhesion formation. Inert, nonlinting polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) sponges have been used as an alternative to reduce intraoperative tissue trauma and particle remnants in other surgical fields. We investigate the effect of PVA sponges on reducing postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions in a murine model.

Methods and methods

In total, 189 C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into three groups by abdominal packing intervention. Following laparotomy on day 0, the abdominal cavity was packed with cotton gauze (n = 53), PVA wipe (n = 54), or no packing (sham; n = 58) for three rounds of 10 min each before packing was removed. Mice were euthanized, and necropsies were performed between postoperative days 13-15. Adhesions were graded by two blinded observers using a validated system composed of adhesion extent, tenacity, and density. Adhesion scores were compared between the three groups.

Results

Compared to adhesions in gauze-packed mice, adhesions in PVA-packed mice were significantly less extensive, less tenacious, and less dense (P < 0.001 for all), which equated to lower total adhesion scores in PVA-packed mice (0 [0, 3] versus 5 [2, 7], P < 0.001). The adhesion scores for sham group mice were significantly lower than PVA and gauze mice in all categories.

Conclusions

This is the first study to directly compare postoperative intra-abdominal adhesion formation following the use of gauze and PVA sponges in an animal model. PVA sponges significantly reduce postoperative adhesions when compared to standard cotton gauze sponges. PVA should be further explored as a useful alternative to reduce postoperative adhesion-related morbidity.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信