{"title":"A systematic review on the recycling of polyurethane products from offshore applications","authors":"Ali Karrech, He Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.cec.2025.100129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the growing environmental awareness, more scrutiny is placed on the responsible handling of materials during the decommissioning of offshore facilities no longer in use. These facilities may contain polyurethane, renowned for its versatility, resilience, stability, buoyancy, and insulation (thermal, acoustic, and electrical). Recycling polyurethane (PU) from offshore facilities is both an opportunity and a challenge that has not been addressed thoroughly yet in the published literature. While recycling polyurethane from domestic and onshore industrial applications is relatively well-documented, literature reviews on recycling PU from offshore environments are scarce. To date, there are no comprehensive syntheses on offshore PU recycling approaches. The purpose of this review is to identify published articles that (1) describe the recycling of PU with a special focus on offshore oil and gas production and transport, (2) explore potential applications/consumers for recycled PU products, and (3) examine the economic/environmental viability of PU recycling in a typical offshore province, the North West Shelf of Australia.</div><div>A systematic search was conducted using three electronic databases (Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science) to source articles that describe the recycling of offshore polyurethane and its potential. Recycling methods were extracted and synthesised to identify their advantages, disadvantages, and possible gaps in the existing body of knowledge. By synthesising the literature on PU recycling, analysing the local market, and conducting a life cycle assessment of recycling methods, this study demonstrated that mechanical recycling is superior to its alternatives in terms of environmental impact and economic viability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100245,"journal":{"name":"Circular Economy","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circular Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773167725000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the growing environmental awareness, more scrutiny is placed on the responsible handling of materials during the decommissioning of offshore facilities no longer in use. These facilities may contain polyurethane, renowned for its versatility, resilience, stability, buoyancy, and insulation (thermal, acoustic, and electrical). Recycling polyurethane (PU) from offshore facilities is both an opportunity and a challenge that has not been addressed thoroughly yet in the published literature. While recycling polyurethane from domestic and onshore industrial applications is relatively well-documented, literature reviews on recycling PU from offshore environments are scarce. To date, there are no comprehensive syntheses on offshore PU recycling approaches. The purpose of this review is to identify published articles that (1) describe the recycling of PU with a special focus on offshore oil and gas production and transport, (2) explore potential applications/consumers for recycled PU products, and (3) examine the economic/environmental viability of PU recycling in a typical offshore province, the North West Shelf of Australia.
A systematic search was conducted using three electronic databases (Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science) to source articles that describe the recycling of offshore polyurethane and its potential. Recycling methods were extracted and synthesised to identify their advantages, disadvantages, and possible gaps in the existing body of knowledge. By synthesising the literature on PU recycling, analysing the local market, and conducting a life cycle assessment of recycling methods, this study demonstrated that mechanical recycling is superior to its alternatives in terms of environmental impact and economic viability.
随着环保意识的增强,在不再使用的海上设施退役期间,对材料的负责任处理受到了更多的审查。这些设施可能含有聚氨酯,以其多功能性、弹性、稳定性、浮力和绝缘性(热、声、电)而闻名。从海上设施中回收聚氨酯(PU)既是机遇也是挑战,在已发表的文献中尚未得到彻底解决。虽然从国内和陆上工业应用中回收聚氨酯的文献记录相对较好,但从海上环境中回收PU的文献综述却很少。到目前为止,还没有关于海上PU回收方法的综合研究。本综述的目的是找出以下已发表的文章:(1)描述PU的回收利用,特别关注海上油气生产和运输;(2)探索回收PU产品的潜在应用/消费者;(3)在澳大利亚西北大陆架一个典型的海上省份研究PU回收利用的经济/环境可行性。通过三个电子数据库(Scopus, ScienceDirect和Web of Science)进行了系统的搜索,以获取描述海上聚氨酯回收及其潜力的文章。提取和综合回收方法,以确定其优点,缺点和现有知识体系中可能存在的差距。通过综合有关PU回收的文献,分析当地市场,并对回收方法进行生命周期评估,本研究表明,在环境影响和经济可行性方面,机械回收优于其替代品。