Within person predictors of physical activity and fatigue in long Covid: Findings from an ecological momentary assessment study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Christopher Burton , Helen Dawes , Caroline Dalton
{"title":"Within person predictors of physical activity and fatigue in long Covid: Findings from an ecological momentary assessment study","authors":"Christopher Burton ,&nbsp;Helen Dawes ,&nbsp;Caroline Dalton","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to examine the extent to which current perceived demand for energy and affect predict subsequent physical activity and fatigue in people with Long Covid using an intensive longitudinal method (ecological momentary assessment).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Analysis of data from a study of 69 adults with self-reported Long Covid combining 3-hourly self-report data perceived energy, and fatigue, on a smartphone app with continuous physical activity recording. We tested three hypotheses derived from cognitive behavioural and neuroscientific models of fatigue. These related to expectation, current affect and recalled emotional demand. Analysis used linear mixed effects models with fatigue and physical activity as outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Expectation of energy need for the next 3 h was predictive of physical activity, fatigue and recalled demandingness of the period. (<em>p</em>-values 0.005 to &lt;0.0001). Currently feeling positive was predictive of slightly more subsequent physical activity and less fatigue 3 h later (<em>p</em> = 0.01). Feeling negative was not predictive of physical activity or subsequent fatigue but was predictive of subsequent recall of the period being emotionally demanding. Feeling more anxious was predictive of greater fatigue 3 h later (<em>p</em> = 0.001) but not of reduced physical activity. Absolute effects were small: a one-point increase in anticipated demand (on a scale of 1–7) was associated with an extra 2.2 min of moderate or vigorous physical activity and a one standard deviation increase in anxiety was associated with a one-point increase in fatigue (0–100 scale).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In the day-to-day experience of Long Covid expectation and affect have little detectable effect on subsequent physical activity or fatigue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112091"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399925000558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to examine the extent to which current perceived demand for energy and affect predict subsequent physical activity and fatigue in people with Long Covid using an intensive longitudinal method (ecological momentary assessment).

Methods

Analysis of data from a study of 69 adults with self-reported Long Covid combining 3-hourly self-report data perceived energy, and fatigue, on a smartphone app with continuous physical activity recording. We tested three hypotheses derived from cognitive behavioural and neuroscientific models of fatigue. These related to expectation, current affect and recalled emotional demand. Analysis used linear mixed effects models with fatigue and physical activity as outcomes.

Results

Expectation of energy need for the next 3 h was predictive of physical activity, fatigue and recalled demandingness of the period. (p-values 0.005 to <0.0001). Currently feeling positive was predictive of slightly more subsequent physical activity and less fatigue 3 h later (p = 0.01). Feeling negative was not predictive of physical activity or subsequent fatigue but was predictive of subsequent recall of the period being emotionally demanding. Feeling more anxious was predictive of greater fatigue 3 h later (p = 0.001) but not of reduced physical activity. Absolute effects were small: a one-point increase in anticipated demand (on a scale of 1–7) was associated with an extra 2.2 min of moderate or vigorous physical activity and a one standard deviation increase in anxiety was associated with a one-point increase in fatigue (0–100 scale).

Conclusion

In the day-to-day experience of Long Covid expectation and affect have little detectable effect on subsequent physical activity or fatigue.
长期Covid期间身体活动和疲劳的个人预测因素:一项生态瞬时评估研究的结果
目的:我们旨在使用密集的纵向方法(生态瞬时评估)研究长冠肺炎患者当前感知的能量需求和影响对后续身体活动和疲劳的预测程度。方法对69名自我报告长冠状病毒的成年人的研究数据进行分析,结合智能手机应用程序上3小时自我报告的感知能量和疲劳数据,并连续记录身体活动。我们测试了从疲劳的认知行为和神经科学模型中得出的三个假设。这些与期望、当前情感和回忆的情感需求有关。分析采用以疲劳和体力活动为结果的线性混合效应模型。结果对未来3小时能量需求的预期可以预测该时期的体力活动、疲劳和回忆需求。(p值0.005至<;0.0001)。目前的积极情绪预示着随后的体力活动会增加,3小时后的疲劳感会减少(p = 0.01)。消极情绪并不预示着身体活动或随后的疲劳,但预示着随后的情感需求回忆。感觉更焦虑预示着3小时后更疲劳(p = 0.001),但与体力活动减少无关。绝对影响很小:预期需求增加1分(1-7分)与中度或剧烈体育活动增加2.2分钟相关,焦虑增加1个标准差与疲劳增加1分相关(0-100分)。结论在日常经验中,长冠预期和情绪对后续体力活动和疲劳的影响不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信