Green banking illusion? The influence of “Eco-Conscious” bank shareholders on credit allocation

IF 7.2 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Adrian Böhm , Christian Eufinger , Igor Kadach , Yuki Sakasai
{"title":"Green banking illusion? The influence of “Eco-Conscious” bank shareholders on credit allocation","authors":"Adrian Böhm ,&nbsp;Christian Eufinger ,&nbsp;Igor Kadach ,&nbsp;Yuki Sakasai","doi":"10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Can voluntary market-based initiatives effectively promote greener credit allocation? Our paper addresses this question by assessing the role of self-declared environmentally conscious bank shareholders, specifically those endorsing the UN Principles for Responsible Investment, in shaping the sustainability of bank loan portfolios. For our analysis, we utilize a comprehensive dataset that includes information on syndicated loans, firm-level emissions, and both bank and firm ownership and financial data. Controlling for loan demand, at the bank–firm level, we find no evidence of an association between a higher ownership stake by eco-conscious bank shareholders and shifts in banks’ loan allocation strategies between firms with low and high emissions. At the firm-level, we find that lending relationships with banks characterized by greater eco-conscious ownership are not associated with significantly improved environmental performance among borrower firms. Our analysis reveals that banks are treated differently by investors compared to non-financial firms, likely due to regulatory requirements and their unique governance structures, which might explain the observed lack of influence of eco-conscious bank shareholders. Our findings thus indicate the potential limitations of relying on self-declared eco-conscious bank shareholders to guide banks toward environmentally sustainable credit allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15525,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Finance","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 102767"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119925000355","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Can voluntary market-based initiatives effectively promote greener credit allocation? Our paper addresses this question by assessing the role of self-declared environmentally conscious bank shareholders, specifically those endorsing the UN Principles for Responsible Investment, in shaping the sustainability of bank loan portfolios. For our analysis, we utilize a comprehensive dataset that includes information on syndicated loans, firm-level emissions, and both bank and firm ownership and financial data. Controlling for loan demand, at the bank–firm level, we find no evidence of an association between a higher ownership stake by eco-conscious bank shareholders and shifts in banks’ loan allocation strategies between firms with low and high emissions. At the firm-level, we find that lending relationships with banks characterized by greater eco-conscious ownership are not associated with significantly improved environmental performance among borrower firms. Our analysis reveals that banks are treated differently by investors compared to non-financial firms, likely due to regulatory requirements and their unique governance structures, which might explain the observed lack of influence of eco-conscious bank shareholders. Our findings thus indicate the potential limitations of relying on self-declared eco-conscious bank shareholders to guide banks toward environmentally sustainable credit allocation.
绿色银行错觉?“生态意识”银行股东对信贷配置的影响
基于市场的自愿举措能否有效促进更环保的信贷分配?我们的论文通过评估自称具有环保意识的银行股东,特别是那些认可联合国负责任投资原则的股东,在塑造银行贷款组合的可持续性方面的作用来解决这个问题。在我们的分析中,我们使用了一个全面的数据集,其中包括银团贷款信息、公司层面的排放、银行和公司所有权以及财务数据。控制贷款需求,在银行-公司层面,我们发现没有证据表明具有生态意识的银行股东持有更高的股权与银行在低排放和高排放公司之间的贷款分配策略变化之间存在关联。在企业层面,我们发现,与拥有更强生态意识的银行的贷款关系与借款人企业环境绩效的显著改善无关。我们的分析显示,与非金融公司相比,投资者对待银行的方式不同,这可能是由于监管要求和其独特的治理结构,这可能解释了观察到的生态意识银行股东缺乏影响力。因此,我们的研究结果表明,依靠自称具有生态意识的银行股东来指导银行实现环境可持续信贷分配的潜在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Corporate Finance
Journal of Corporate Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Corporate Finance aims to publish high quality, original manuscripts that analyze issues related to corporate finance. Contributions can be of a theoretical, empirical, or clinical nature. Topical areas of interest include, but are not limited to: financial structure, payout policies, corporate restructuring, financial contracts, corporate governance arrangements, the economics of organizations, the influence of legal structures, and international financial management. Papers that apply asset pricing and microstructure analysis to corporate finance issues are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信