Gym entry fees act as a barrier to exercising in community gyms for young adults with disability: A mixed methods study

Rachel A. Kennedy, Georgia McKenzie, Nora Shields
{"title":"Gym entry fees act as a barrier to exercising in community gyms for young adults with disability: A mixed methods study","authors":"Rachel A. Kennedy,&nbsp;Georgia McKenzie,&nbsp;Nora Shields","doi":"10.1016/j.jsampl.2025.100094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cost is a barrier to exercise for young adults with disability aged 18–35 years. Few studies have investigated this barrier in depth. We explored the cost barrier to exercise for young adults with disability in the context of community gyms.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A mixed methods study was completed. Data were collected in three consecutive phases. Phase 1 was a survey of entry options reflecting current practice in 59 community gyms. Phase 2 comprised semi-structured interviews with 20 young adults with disability and 25 community gym staff. Phase 3 involved three focus groups with key informants (n ​= ​20 total) from disability, recreation, and policy sectors. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Gyms estimated 10 ​% of members had a disability. The overarching theme was a mismatch between the wants and needs of young adults with disability with what community gyms and disability systems offer. Three subthemes illustrated this: young adults need flexibility but current practices limit gym entry options; young adults seek value for money, but current practices advocate value-add; and young adults desire community participation, but current practices inadvertently reinforce a rehabilitation model. A further subtheme —financial viability—related to how recreation centres were often not financially sustainable limiting gym entry practices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite broadly supportive recreation and policy sectors, current practices and funding systems are misaligned with the wants and needs of young adults with disability, and often incongruent with societal values of social inclusion and community-based physical activity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74029,"journal":{"name":"JSAMS plus","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSAMS plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772696725000080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cost is a barrier to exercise for young adults with disability aged 18–35 years. Few studies have investigated this barrier in depth. We explored the cost barrier to exercise for young adults with disability in the context of community gyms.

Method

A mixed methods study was completed. Data were collected in three consecutive phases. Phase 1 was a survey of entry options reflecting current practice in 59 community gyms. Phase 2 comprised semi-structured interviews with 20 young adults with disability and 25 community gym staff. Phase 3 involved three focus groups with key informants (n ​= ​20 total) from disability, recreation, and policy sectors. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Gyms estimated 10 ​% of members had a disability. The overarching theme was a mismatch between the wants and needs of young adults with disability with what community gyms and disability systems offer. Three subthemes illustrated this: young adults need flexibility but current practices limit gym entry options; young adults seek value for money, but current practices advocate value-add; and young adults desire community participation, but current practices inadvertently reinforce a rehabilitation model. A further subtheme —financial viability—related to how recreation centres were often not financially sustainable limiting gym entry practices.

Conclusion

Despite broadly supportive recreation and policy sectors, current practices and funding systems are misaligned with the wants and needs of young adults with disability, and often incongruent with societal values of social inclusion and community-based physical activity.
健身房入场费是残疾年轻人在社区健身房锻炼的障碍:一项混合方法研究
成本是18-35岁的年轻残疾成年人锻炼的一个障碍。很少有研究深入研究这一屏障。我们探讨了在社区健身房的背景下,年轻的残疾成年人锻炼的成本障碍。方法采用混合方法进行研究。数据收集分三个连续阶段进行。第一阶段是对59家社区健身房的入学选择进行调查,反映了目前的做法。第二阶段包括对20名残疾青年和25名社区健身房工作人员的半结构化访谈。第三阶段涉及三个焦点小组,其中包括来自残疾、娱乐和政策部门的主要线人(n = 20)。定量数据进行描述性分析。定性数据采用归纳主题分析法进行分析。结果健身房估计有10%的会员有残疾。最重要的主题是残疾年轻人的需求与社区健身房和残疾系统提供的服务之间的不匹配。三个副主题说明了这一点:年轻人需要灵活性,但目前的做法限制了进入健身房的选择;年轻人追求物有所值,但目前的做法提倡增值;年轻人渴望社区参与,但目前的做法无意中强化了一种康复模式。另一个副主题是财务可行性,这与娱乐中心通常在财务上不可持续有关,限制了进入健身房的做法。尽管娱乐和政策部门广泛支持,但目前的做法和资助系统与残疾青年的需求和需求不一致,而且往往与社会包容和以社区为基础的体育活动的社会价值观不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信