Gym entry fees act as a barrier to exercising in community gyms for young adults with disability: A mixed methods study

Rachel A. Kennedy, Georgia McKenzie, Nora Shields
{"title":"Gym entry fees act as a barrier to exercising in community gyms for young adults with disability: A mixed methods study","authors":"Rachel A. Kennedy,&nbsp;Georgia McKenzie,&nbsp;Nora Shields","doi":"10.1016/j.jsampl.2025.100094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cost is a barrier to exercise for young adults with disability aged 18–35 years. Few studies have investigated this barrier in depth. We explored the cost barrier to exercise for young adults with disability in the context of community gyms.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A mixed methods study was completed. Data were collected in three consecutive phases. Phase 1 was a survey of entry options reflecting current practice in 59 community gyms. Phase 2 comprised semi-structured interviews with 20 young adults with disability and 25 community gym staff. Phase 3 involved three focus groups with key informants (n ​= ​20 total) from disability, recreation, and policy sectors. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Gyms estimated 10 ​% of members had a disability. The overarching theme was a mismatch between the wants and needs of young adults with disability with what community gyms and disability systems offer. Three subthemes illustrated this: young adults need flexibility but current practices limit gym entry options; young adults seek value for money, but current practices advocate value-add; and young adults desire community participation, but current practices inadvertently reinforce a rehabilitation model. A further subtheme —financial viability—related to how recreation centres were often not financially sustainable limiting gym entry practices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite broadly supportive recreation and policy sectors, current practices and funding systems are misaligned with the wants and needs of young adults with disability, and often incongruent with societal values of social inclusion and community-based physical activity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74029,"journal":{"name":"JSAMS plus","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSAMS plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772696725000080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cost is a barrier to exercise for young adults with disability aged 18–35 years. Few studies have investigated this barrier in depth. We explored the cost barrier to exercise for young adults with disability in the context of community gyms.

Method

A mixed methods study was completed. Data were collected in three consecutive phases. Phase 1 was a survey of entry options reflecting current practice in 59 community gyms. Phase 2 comprised semi-structured interviews with 20 young adults with disability and 25 community gym staff. Phase 3 involved three focus groups with key informants (n ​= ​20 total) from disability, recreation, and policy sectors. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Gyms estimated 10 ​% of members had a disability. The overarching theme was a mismatch between the wants and needs of young adults with disability with what community gyms and disability systems offer. Three subthemes illustrated this: young adults need flexibility but current practices limit gym entry options; young adults seek value for money, but current practices advocate value-add; and young adults desire community participation, but current practices inadvertently reinforce a rehabilitation model. A further subtheme —financial viability—related to how recreation centres were often not financially sustainable limiting gym entry practices.

Conclusion

Despite broadly supportive recreation and policy sectors, current practices and funding systems are misaligned with the wants and needs of young adults with disability, and often incongruent with societal values of social inclusion and community-based physical activity.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信