Field procedure and data collection tool: Towards controlling GPS multipath error for mapping within urban semi-closed areas

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mohamed M. Hosny , Hassan G.Z. Elghazouly , Samy Ayaad
{"title":"Field procedure and data collection tool: Towards controlling GPS multipath error for mapping within urban semi-closed areas","authors":"Mohamed M. Hosny ,&nbsp;Hassan G.Z. Elghazouly ,&nbsp;Samy Ayaad","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multipath error, a significant challenge in GNSS positioning, arises from signals reaching the receiver via multiple paths, thus biasing range and location. This paper presents a new tool and charting method, using a predefined model, to mitigate multipath effects in pseudorange measurements within U-shaped urban obstructions. The model incorporates obstruction dimensions and receiver location, utilizing L1 and L2 carrier frequencies. Focusing on pseudorange errors caused by multipath at obstruction distances of 7–52 m, the study determines optimal observation times for various satellite systems and signal combinations. Charts are provided to determine the optimum observation time for the maximum required attainable accuracy, obstruction ratios (D/H), and angles (α). Results showed that total error decreased with longer observation times (10–120 minutes), ranging from 2 mm to 18.1 cm. Higher D/H ratios (closer obstructions) correlated with larger errors. Smaller obstruction angles generally yielded smaller errors, especially with longer observation times. The study produced a new charting tool to determine optimal observation time based on desired accuracy, D/H ratio, and α, aiming to minimize multipath error in obstructed environments. This tool aids in selecting optimal GPS antenna placement, measurement time, and expected accuracy in environments where reflection coefficients are difficult to determine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"122 ","pages":"Pages 288-299"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016825002947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multipath error, a significant challenge in GNSS positioning, arises from signals reaching the receiver via multiple paths, thus biasing range and location. This paper presents a new tool and charting method, using a predefined model, to mitigate multipath effects in pseudorange measurements within U-shaped urban obstructions. The model incorporates obstruction dimensions and receiver location, utilizing L1 and L2 carrier frequencies. Focusing on pseudorange errors caused by multipath at obstruction distances of 7–52 m, the study determines optimal observation times for various satellite systems and signal combinations. Charts are provided to determine the optimum observation time for the maximum required attainable accuracy, obstruction ratios (D/H), and angles (α). Results showed that total error decreased with longer observation times (10–120 minutes), ranging from 2 mm to 18.1 cm. Higher D/H ratios (closer obstructions) correlated with larger errors. Smaller obstruction angles generally yielded smaller errors, especially with longer observation times. The study produced a new charting tool to determine optimal observation time based on desired accuracy, D/H ratio, and α, aiming to minimize multipath error in obstructed environments. This tool aids in selecting optimal GPS antenna placement, measurement time, and expected accuracy in environments where reflection coefficients are difficult to determine.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
alexandria engineering journal
alexandria engineering journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
1015
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification: • Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering • Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering • Civil and Architecture Engineering • Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences • Environmental Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信