{"title":"Coopetitive Resilience: Integrating Cyber Threat Intelligence Platforms in Critical Supply Chains","authors":"Sobhan Arisian , Kourosh Halat , Ashkan Hafezalkotob , Reenu Maskey","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study proposes a novel contractual framework that integrates flexible cooperative procurement strategies within a Cyber Threat Intelligence Platform (CTIP) to address cyber-attack-induced disruptions in critical supply chains (CSCs). The framework examines the role of government in moderating CTIPs to facilitate information sharing, incentivize cybersecurity investments, and promote collaboration among competing CSCs. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in enhancing operational resilience while balancing profitability and economic welfare (EW). To validate these insights, we conduct a case study on cyber disruptions affecting Australia’s health and medical procurement sector. The results reveal that flexible minimum order quantity (MOQ) contracts provide greater EW benefits, particularly in high-risk environments, compared to fixed-quantity separate procurement models. Furthermore, this mechanism fosters <em>coopetitive resilience</em> by enabling CSCs to balance competition with cooperation, thereby strengthening their cyber readiness and collective ability to mitigate disruptions. Adjusting MOQ thresholds, government subsidies, and the level of cyber intelligence sharing may further enhance these benefits. Aligning CTIP regulations and targeted interventions with the distinct risk profiles of firms is crucial for optimizing outcomes in the face of cyber disruptions. This approach is particularly vital in critical sectors such as food, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare, where the timely availability of products is essential to safeguarding public safety and health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 104043"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525000845","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study proposes a novel contractual framework that integrates flexible cooperative procurement strategies within a Cyber Threat Intelligence Platform (CTIP) to address cyber-attack-induced disruptions in critical supply chains (CSCs). The framework examines the role of government in moderating CTIPs to facilitate information sharing, incentivize cybersecurity investments, and promote collaboration among competing CSCs. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in enhancing operational resilience while balancing profitability and economic welfare (EW). To validate these insights, we conduct a case study on cyber disruptions affecting Australia’s health and medical procurement sector. The results reveal that flexible minimum order quantity (MOQ) contracts provide greater EW benefits, particularly in high-risk environments, compared to fixed-quantity separate procurement models. Furthermore, this mechanism fosters coopetitive resilience by enabling CSCs to balance competition with cooperation, thereby strengthening their cyber readiness and collective ability to mitigate disruptions. Adjusting MOQ thresholds, government subsidies, and the level of cyber intelligence sharing may further enhance these benefits. Aligning CTIP regulations and targeted interventions with the distinct risk profiles of firms is crucial for optimizing outcomes in the face of cyber disruptions. This approach is particularly vital in critical sectors such as food, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare, where the timely availability of products is essential to safeguarding public safety and health.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.