{"title":"Leveraging a Community of Practice to Prepare Elementary Preservice Teachers for Instruction with Socioscientific Issues","authors":"Melanie Kinskey","doi":"10.1007/s11165-025-10242-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Incorporating socioscientific issues (SSI) into science instruction has demonstrated significant potential for enhancing K-12 students’ abilities to connect scientific concepts to real-world contexts. While the implementation of SSI is well-established in secondary education, its application in elementary settings is still developing. As with many innovative teaching approaches, formal preparation on how to effectively integrate SSI into the curriculum is essential for educators. The purpose of the current study was to investigate a Community of Practice (CoP) model as a framework for delivering formal professional learning experiences related to SSI-based lesson planning and instruction for elementary teacher candidates. Using qualitative methods, the study aimed to explore how the content of the CoP focused on SSI transferred into the science instruction of these candidates during their student teaching experiences. The researcher analyzed CoP meeting transcripts, conducted interviews, and observed classroom practices to gain insights into the transfer of SSI constructs from the CoP to the teaching practices of elementary teacher candidates. The findings indicate a positive transfer of SSI principles into the candidates' instructional methods, demonstrating how they integrated SSI into their lesson plans and classroom interactions. However, the analysis also revealed nuances in how individual candidates interpreted and enacted each SSI construct, suggesting that while there is a general understanding of the framework, personal experiences and pedagogical beliefs influenced their application in the classroom. Based on the findings presented in this manuscript, the researcher advocates for the expansion of professional learning opportunities for elementary teacher candidates that focus specifically on SSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"142 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10242-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Incorporating socioscientific issues (SSI) into science instruction has demonstrated significant potential for enhancing K-12 students’ abilities to connect scientific concepts to real-world contexts. While the implementation of SSI is well-established in secondary education, its application in elementary settings is still developing. As with many innovative teaching approaches, formal preparation on how to effectively integrate SSI into the curriculum is essential for educators. The purpose of the current study was to investigate a Community of Practice (CoP) model as a framework for delivering formal professional learning experiences related to SSI-based lesson planning and instruction for elementary teacher candidates. Using qualitative methods, the study aimed to explore how the content of the CoP focused on SSI transferred into the science instruction of these candidates during their student teaching experiences. The researcher analyzed CoP meeting transcripts, conducted interviews, and observed classroom practices to gain insights into the transfer of SSI constructs from the CoP to the teaching practices of elementary teacher candidates. The findings indicate a positive transfer of SSI principles into the candidates' instructional methods, demonstrating how they integrated SSI into their lesson plans and classroom interactions. However, the analysis also revealed nuances in how individual candidates interpreted and enacted each SSI construct, suggesting that while there is a general understanding of the framework, personal experiences and pedagogical beliefs influenced their application in the classroom. Based on the findings presented in this manuscript, the researcher advocates for the expansion of professional learning opportunities for elementary teacher candidates that focus specifically on SSI.
期刊介绍:
2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021
2020 Impact Factor: 5.439
Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus
2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus
Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership.
RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal.
You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research:
Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and
Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know.
RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted.
The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers.
Empircal contributions are:
Theoretically or conceptually grounded;
Relevant to science education theory and practice;
Highlight limitations of the study; and
Identify possible future research opportunities.
From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks.
Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is:
No longer than 6000 words, including references.
Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability;
Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education;
Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and
Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE.
While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.