Reliability and validity of the Geriatric Self-Care Scale among Chinese older adults.

IF 4.3
Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2025.2478480
Hongji Zeng, Weijia Zhao, Rui Wang, Xin'ao Wang, Pengchao Luo, Xuyang Zhang, Xi Zeng
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Geriatric Self-Care Scale among Chinese older adults.","authors":"Hongji Zeng, Weijia Zhao, Rui Wang, Xin'ao Wang, Pengchao Luo, Xuyang Zhang, Xi Zeng","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2025.2478480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the Geriatric Self-Care Scale (GSS) has been widely used in community investigations in China, its reliability and validity have yet to be analyzed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the GSS in community-dwelling Chinese older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included 29428 older adults. Content validity was analyzed using the Content Validity Index (CVI). Reliability analysis included internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Differences in participants who could live independently versus those who could not were analyzed for discriminant validity. The Barthel Index was used as the gold standard. Spearman's correlation and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to assess convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CVI for the GSS was 0.920, with CVI values of 1.000, 0.900, 1.000, 0.800 and 0.900. The Cronbach's alpha for the GSS was 0.869 (for all participants) and 0.867 (for participants aged ≥ 65 years) and the item Cronbach's alpha coefficients were all >0.8. The Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients for both the scale and each item were greater than 0.8. There were significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) between participants who could live independently and those who could not. There were significant correlations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) between the GSS and Barthel Index for each item and the total score. ROC analysis revealed that all areas under the curve were greater than 0.8, with a sensitivity and specificity exceeding 0.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GSS showed good reliability and validity among community-dwelling older adults in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2478480"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2478480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the Geriatric Self-Care Scale (GSS) has been widely used in community investigations in China, its reliability and validity have yet to be analyzed.

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the GSS in community-dwelling Chinese older adults.

Methods: This prospective observational study included 29428 older adults. Content validity was analyzed using the Content Validity Index (CVI). Reliability analysis included internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Differences in participants who could live independently versus those who could not were analyzed for discriminant validity. The Barthel Index was used as the gold standard. Spearman's correlation and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to assess convergent validity.

Results: The CVI for the GSS was 0.920, with CVI values of 1.000, 0.900, 1.000, 0.800 and 0.900. The Cronbach's alpha for the GSS was 0.869 (for all participants) and 0.867 (for participants aged ≥ 65 years) and the item Cronbach's alpha coefficients were all >0.8. The Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients for both the scale and each item were greater than 0.8. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between participants who could live independently and those who could not. There were significant correlations (p < 0.05) between the GSS and Barthel Index for each item and the total score. ROC analysis revealed that all areas under the curve were greater than 0.8, with a sensitivity and specificity exceeding 0.8.

Conclusions: The GSS showed good reliability and validity among community-dwelling older adults in China.

中国老年人自我照顾量表的信度和效度。
背景:虽然老年自我照顾量表(GSS)在中国的社区调查中得到了广泛的应用,但其信度和效度还有待分析。目的:本研究旨在检验GSS在中国社区老年人中的信度和效度。方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了29428名老年人。采用内容效度指数(Content validity Index, CVI)分析内容效度。信度分析包括内部一致性和重测信度。能够独立生活的参与者与不能独立生活的参与者的差异进行了判别效度分析。巴特尔指数被用作黄金标准。采用Spearman相关及受试者工作特征(Receiver Operating Characteristic, ROC)分析评估收敛效度。结果:GSS的CVI值为0.920,CVI值分别为1.000、0.900、1.000、0.800和0.900。GSS的Cronbach's alpha为0.869(所有参与者)和0.867(≥65岁参与者),项目Cronbach's alpha系数均为>0.8。量表和各条目的Pearson相关系数和class内相关系数均大于0.8。结论:GSS在中国社区居住老年人中具有良好的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信