CEASE Tobacco Cessation Program: Validation of Self-Rated Quit with Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence.

Global journal of cardiovascular diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.31586/gjcd.2025.1190
Payam Sheikhattari, Rifath Ara Alam Barsha, Chidubem Egboluche, Adriana Foster, Shervin Assari
{"title":"CEASE Tobacco Cessation Program: Validation of Self-Rated Quit with Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence.","authors":"Payam Sheikhattari, Rifath Ara Alam Barsha, Chidubem Egboluche, Adriana Foster, Shervin Assari","doi":"10.31586/gjcd.2025.1190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advancements in smoking cessation interventions, few programs have demonstrated sustained effectiveness among low-income, underserved populations. The Communities Engaged and Advocating for a Smoke-free Environment (CEASE) program was developed to address this gap and support tobacco cessation in these communities. However, it remains unclear whether self-reported outcome measures in this context are in line with more objective outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to validate self-reported quit rates using the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) as a gold standard outcome measure for evaluation of the effectiveness of the CEASE smoking cessation intervention compared to a self-help approach among low-income, underserved adult smokers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental design was employed to evaluate this community-based intervention. Although participants were initially assigned to three groups, this report focuses on two arms that show the major difference in the efficacy of the program: (1) the self-help group (reference; Arm 1) and (2) the in-person CEASE group (Arm 2). Outcomes included successful quitting, assessed through self-reports, and changes in FTND scores. To examine the concordance between these measures, we tested whether changes in FTND scores fully explained the relationship between the intervention and self-reported quitting. Potential confounders included demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related variables. Data were analyzed using regression and structural equation modeling (SEM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of participants were Black Americans, followed by White individuals and those of other racial backgrounds. The CEASE intervention (Arm 2) demonstrated effectiveness in reducing nicotine dependence (measured by FTND) and increasing self-reported quit rates compared to the self-help group. Importantly, changes in FTND scores fully explained the effect of the CEASE intervention on self-reported quitting, highlighting the program's impact on addiction severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Successful quitting measured using self-report is in line with the decline in nicotine addiction severity among low-income racial minority populations. CEASE holds promise as a scalable solution to address smoking disparities in underserved communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":520306,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of cardiovascular diseases","volume":"4 1","pages":"22-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of cardiovascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31586/gjcd.2025.1190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite advancements in smoking cessation interventions, few programs have demonstrated sustained effectiveness among low-income, underserved populations. The Communities Engaged and Advocating for a Smoke-free Environment (CEASE) program was developed to address this gap and support tobacco cessation in these communities. However, it remains unclear whether self-reported outcome measures in this context are in line with more objective outcome measures.

Aims: This study aimed to validate self-reported quit rates using the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) as a gold standard outcome measure for evaluation of the effectiveness of the CEASE smoking cessation intervention compared to a self-help approach among low-income, underserved adult smokers.

Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed to evaluate this community-based intervention. Although participants were initially assigned to three groups, this report focuses on two arms that show the major difference in the efficacy of the program: (1) the self-help group (reference; Arm 1) and (2) the in-person CEASE group (Arm 2). Outcomes included successful quitting, assessed through self-reports, and changes in FTND scores. To examine the concordance between these measures, we tested whether changes in FTND scores fully explained the relationship between the intervention and self-reported quitting. Potential confounders included demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related variables. Data were analyzed using regression and structural equation modeling (SEM).

Results: The majority of participants were Black Americans, followed by White individuals and those of other racial backgrounds. The CEASE intervention (Arm 2) demonstrated effectiveness in reducing nicotine dependence (measured by FTND) and increasing self-reported quit rates compared to the self-help group. Importantly, changes in FTND scores fully explained the effect of the CEASE intervention on self-reported quitting, highlighting the program's impact on addiction severity.

Conclusion: Successful quitting measured using self-report is in line with the decline in nicotine addiction severity among low-income racial minority populations. CEASE holds promise as a scalable solution to address smoking disparities in underserved communities.

戒烟计划:用法格斯特罗姆尼古丁依赖试验验证自评戒烟者。
背景:尽管戒烟干预措施取得了进展,但很少有项目在低收入、服务不足的人群中表现出持续的有效性。制定了社区参与和倡导无烟环境(停止)计划,以解决这一差距并支持这些社区的戒烟。然而,目前尚不清楚在这种情况下,自我报告的结果测量是否与更客观的结果测量一致。目的:本研究旨在验证自我报告的戒烟率,使用Fagerström尼古丁依赖测试(FTND)作为评估戒烟干预与自助方法在低收入,服务不足的成年吸烟者中的有效性的金标准结果测量。方法:采用准实验设计对社区干预进行评价。虽然参与者最初被分配到三个组,但本报告侧重于显示该计划效果主要差异的两个组:(1)自助组(参考;组1)和(2)亲自戒烟组(组2)。结果包括成功戒烟,通过自我报告评估,以及FTND评分的变化。为了检验这些措施之间的一致性,我们测试了FTND评分的变化是否完全解释了干预与自我报告戒烟之间的关系。潜在的混杂因素包括人口统计学、社会经济和健康相关变量。数据分析采用回归和结构方程模型(SEM)。结果:大多数参与者是美国黑人,其次是白人和其他种族背景的人。与自助组相比,停止干预(第二组)在减少尼古丁依赖(通过FTND测量)和增加自我报告戒烟率方面显示出有效性。重要的是,FTND分数的变化充分解释了停止干预对自我报告戒烟的影响,突出了该计划对成瘾严重程度的影响。结论:在低收入少数种族人群中,自我报告测量的成功戒烟与尼古丁成瘾严重程度的下降是一致的。CEASE有望成为解决服务不足社区吸烟差异的可扩展解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信