Offshore Worker Compliance, Perceived Utility, Effectiveness, and Feasibility of Daily Fatigue Assessments over Four Weeks in the Gulf of Mexico.

John Kang, Allison Chang, Xiaomei Wang, Stephanie C Payne, Ranjana K Mehta, Farzan Sasangohar
{"title":"Offshore Worker Compliance, Perceived Utility, Effectiveness, and Feasibility of Daily Fatigue Assessments over Four Weeks in the Gulf of Mexico.","authors":"John Kang, Allison Chang, Xiaomei Wang, Stephanie C Payne, Ranjana K Mehta, Farzan Sasangohar","doi":"10.1080/24725838.2025.2466835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Occupational ApplicationsWe conducted a study on offshore drillships in the Gulf of Mexico that captured daily compliance rates with various fatigue assessments over four weeks-a Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), actigraphy, physiological monitoring, and surveys. We obtained worker perceptions of these assessments' utility, effectiveness, and feasibility. Each fatigue assessment had a good overall compliance rate (>80%) over the four weeks but declined when the assessment was self-administered. Our interview findings revealed that actigraphy was the preferred means of monitoring their sleep to manage fatigue compared to physiological sensors. Workers also perceived PVT outcomes to be useful, but the duration (∼10 min) was the biggest barrier to continued use. From these findings, we generated research-to-practice recommendations on effective and sustainable fatigue assessments in offshore shiftwork: (1) periodic use of actigraphy watches to monitor sleep time and efficiency and (2) implementation of a short 3- or 5-min PVT on an electronic device.</p>","PeriodicalId":73332,"journal":{"name":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2025.2466835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupational ApplicationsWe conducted a study on offshore drillships in the Gulf of Mexico that captured daily compliance rates with various fatigue assessments over four weeks-a Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), actigraphy, physiological monitoring, and surveys. We obtained worker perceptions of these assessments' utility, effectiveness, and feasibility. Each fatigue assessment had a good overall compliance rate (>80%) over the four weeks but declined when the assessment was self-administered. Our interview findings revealed that actigraphy was the preferred means of monitoring their sleep to manage fatigue compared to physiological sensors. Workers also perceived PVT outcomes to be useful, but the duration (∼10 min) was the biggest barrier to continued use. From these findings, we generated research-to-practice recommendations on effective and sustainable fatigue assessments in offshore shiftwork: (1) periodic use of actigraphy watches to monitor sleep time and efficiency and (2) implementation of a short 3- or 5-min PVT on an electronic device.

墨西哥湾海上作业人员合规性、感知效用、有效性和每日疲劳评估的可行性。
职业应用我们在墨西哥湾的海上钻井船上进行了一项研究,在四周的时间里,通过各种疲劳评估(精神运动警戒任务(PVT)、活动记录仪、生理监测和调查),记录了每天的依从率。我们获得了员工对这些评估的效用、有效性和可行性的看法。在四周内,每次疲劳评估的总体依从率都很好(bbb80 %),但在自我评估时,依从率有所下降。我们的采访结果显示,与生理传感器相比,活动描记仪是监测他们睡眠以控制疲劳的首选手段。工作人员也认为PVT结果是有用的,但持续时间(~ 10分钟)是继续使用的最大障碍。根据这些发现,我们为海上轮班工作中有效和可持续的疲劳评估提出了从研究到实践的建议:(1)定期使用活动记录表来监测睡眠时间和效率;(2)在电子设备上实施短的3或5分钟的PVT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信