Bioethics Artificial Intelligence Advisory (BAIA): An Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework for Bioethical Clinical Decision Support.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.80494
Taposh P Dutta Roy
{"title":"Bioethics Artificial Intelligence Advisory (BAIA): An Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework for Bioethical Clinical Decision Support.","authors":"Taposh P Dutta Roy","doi":"10.7759/cureus.80494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare professionals face complex ethical dilemmas in clinical settings in cases involving end-of-life care, informed consent, and surrogate decision-making. These nuanced situations often lead to moral distress among care providers. This paper introduces the Bioethics Artificial Intelligence Advisory (BAIA) framework, a novel and innovative approach that leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to support clinical ethical decision-making. The BAIA framework integrates multiple bioethical approaches, including principlism, casuistry, and narrative ethics, with advanced AI capabilities to provide comprehensive decision support. The framework employs a structured methodology that includes data collection, paradigmatic case review, analysis through \"mattering maps,\" and scenario-based decision reasoning. A detailed analysis of two challenging cases, an end-of-life care decision and a complex conjoined twins case, demonstrates BAIA's potential to harmonize diverse ethical perspectives while reducing the moral burden on healthcare providers. The framework's agentic architecture additionally allows integration with any new and existing ethical AI systems like METHAD, Delphi, and EAIFT, enabling multiframework collaboration. This work also acknowledges limitations related to data quality, bias, and complexity of ethical decisions and proposes mitigation strategies, including standardized databases, fairness algorithms, and maintaining human oversight. Thus, this work represents a significant step toward combining technological advancement in agentic AI with established bioethical principles to improve the quality and consistency of clinical ethical decision-making, thus reducing moral distress for clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 3","pages":"e80494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare professionals face complex ethical dilemmas in clinical settings in cases involving end-of-life care, informed consent, and surrogate decision-making. These nuanced situations often lead to moral distress among care providers. This paper introduces the Bioethics Artificial Intelligence Advisory (BAIA) framework, a novel and innovative approach that leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to support clinical ethical decision-making. The BAIA framework integrates multiple bioethical approaches, including principlism, casuistry, and narrative ethics, with advanced AI capabilities to provide comprehensive decision support. The framework employs a structured methodology that includes data collection, paradigmatic case review, analysis through "mattering maps," and scenario-based decision reasoning. A detailed analysis of two challenging cases, an end-of-life care decision and a complex conjoined twins case, demonstrates BAIA's potential to harmonize diverse ethical perspectives while reducing the moral burden on healthcare providers. The framework's agentic architecture additionally allows integration with any new and existing ethical AI systems like METHAD, Delphi, and EAIFT, enabling multiframework collaboration. This work also acknowledges limitations related to data quality, bias, and complexity of ethical decisions and proposes mitigation strategies, including standardized databases, fairness algorithms, and maintaining human oversight. Thus, this work represents a significant step toward combining technological advancement in agentic AI with established bioethical principles to improve the quality and consistency of clinical ethical decision-making, thus reducing moral distress for clinicians.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信