Personality in psychosis decades after onset: Tests of models of the relations between psychopathology and personality.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of psychopathology and clinical science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1037/abn0000971
Elizabeth A Martin, Jennifer M Blank, Katherine G Jonas, Wenxuan Lian, Roman Kotov
{"title":"Personality in psychosis decades after onset: Tests of models of the relations between psychopathology and personality.","authors":"Elizabeth A Martin, Jennifer M Blank, Katherine G Jonas, Wenxuan Lian, Roman Kotov","doi":"10.1037/abn0000971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Models have been put forth to describe relations between psychopathology and personality. However, the relation in individuals with psychotic disorders is unclear. As a test of models of psychopathology-personality in psychosis, the current study included 239 individuals, each with one of four psychotic disorders-schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder with psychotic features (BPp), major depressive disorder with psychotic features (MDDp), and substance-induced psychosis (SIP)-and compared their personality to a never-psychotic sample (NP; <i>n</i> = 257). In support of the complication + scar model, we found SZ, BPp, MDDp, and SIP were significantly higher on neuroticism and detachment, and most were higher on mistrust and eccentric perceptions than the NP group (average Cohen's <i>d</i> = |0.83| across all personality measures). Also compared to the NP group, SZ was lower on extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness; MDDp was lower on extraversion and conscientiousness; and SIP was lower on agreeableness and conscientiousness (average Cohen's <i>d</i> = |0.77|). Differences were observed among the psychotic disorder groups (SZ, BPp, MDDp, SIP), with effects up to <i>d</i> = 1.38. In support of the complication model, the non-recovered group was significantly higher on mistrust, eccentric perceptions, and detachment but lower on extraversion and conscientiousness than the recovered group (average <i>d</i> = |0.57| across measures). In support of the scar model, individuals who met threshold for recovery continued to manifest personality deviations, although smaller in magnitude (average <i>d</i> = |0.32| across measures) compared to NP. Overall, we found support for the complication and scar models, suggesting that while symptoms are associated with personality differences, psychosis is associated with permanent personality alterations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":"251-261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Models have been put forth to describe relations between psychopathology and personality. However, the relation in individuals with psychotic disorders is unclear. As a test of models of psychopathology-personality in psychosis, the current study included 239 individuals, each with one of four psychotic disorders-schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder with psychotic features (BPp), major depressive disorder with psychotic features (MDDp), and substance-induced psychosis (SIP)-and compared their personality to a never-psychotic sample (NP; n = 257). In support of the complication + scar model, we found SZ, BPp, MDDp, and SIP were significantly higher on neuroticism and detachment, and most were higher on mistrust and eccentric perceptions than the NP group (average Cohen's d = |0.83| across all personality measures). Also compared to the NP group, SZ was lower on extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness; MDDp was lower on extraversion and conscientiousness; and SIP was lower on agreeableness and conscientiousness (average Cohen's d = |0.77|). Differences were observed among the psychotic disorder groups (SZ, BPp, MDDp, SIP), with effects up to d = 1.38. In support of the complication model, the non-recovered group was significantly higher on mistrust, eccentric perceptions, and detachment but lower on extraversion and conscientiousness than the recovered group (average d = |0.57| across measures). In support of the scar model, individuals who met threshold for recovery continued to manifest personality deviations, although smaller in magnitude (average d = |0.32| across measures) compared to NP. Overall, we found support for the complication and scar models, suggesting that while symptoms are associated with personality differences, psychosis is associated with permanent personality alterations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

精神病发作几十年后的人格:精神病理学与人格关系模型的检验。
人们提出了一些模型来描述精神病理学和人格之间的关系。然而,与精神障碍个体的关系尚不清楚。作为精神病患者的精神病理学-人格模型的检验,目前的研究包括239名个体,每个个体都患有四种精神疾病中的一种-精神分裂症(SZ),双相情感障碍伴精神病特征(BPp),重度抑郁症伴精神病特征(MDDp)和物质诱发精神病(SIP)-并将他们的人格与非精神病样本(NP;N = 257)。为了支持并发症+疤痕模型,我们发现SZ、BPp、MDDp和SIP在神经质和超然上显著高于NP组,大多数人在不信任和古怪知觉上高于NP组(所有人格测量的平均Cohen's d = 0.83|)。此外,与NP组相比,SZ组的外向性、宜人性和尽责性也较低;外倾性和尽责性的MDDp较低;而SIP在亲和性和责任心方面较低(平均科恩d = 0.77|)。精神障碍组(SZ, BPp, MDDp, SIP)之间存在差异,影响达d = 1.38。为了支持并发症模型,未康复组在不信任、古怪感知和脱离上显著高于康复组,但在外向性和责任心上显著低于康复组(各测量的平均d = 0.57|)。为了支持疤痕模型,与NP相比,达到恢复阈值的个体继续表现出人格偏差,尽管程度较小(各测量的平均d = 0.32|)。总的来说,我们发现了并发症和疤痕模型的支持,这表明虽然症状与人格差异有关,但精神病与永久性人格改变有关。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信