Degree of Joint Risk Factor Control and Incident Fracture Outcomes in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Huan Huang, Jie Cai, Huaying Hu, Lishan Cai, Lu Qi, Tao Zhou
{"title":"Degree of Joint Risk Factor Control and Incident Fracture Outcomes in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Huan Huang, Jie Cai, Huaying Hu, Lishan Cai, Lu Qi, Tao Zhou","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Individuals with type 2 diabetes have a higher fracture risk than the general population. However, the association between joint risk factor control and fracture risk in this population remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the extent to which joint risk factor control might attenuate the excess risk of fracture outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 8935 individuals with type 2 diabetes and 35 740 matched controls without fractures at baseline from the UK Biobank (UKB), with a median follow-up of 12.1 years. Six modifiable risk factors were assessed: body mass index (BMI), physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations between risk factor control and fracture risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Controlling each additional risk factor resulted in a 14% to 26% decrease in fracture risk. Optimal control (≥5 risk factors) correlated with a 50% reduction in overall fractures (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.33-0.75). However, a 60% reduction in hip fractures (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.98) was observed with the control of 4 risk factors. With control of 4 or more risk factors, fracture risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes was comparable to that of nondiabetic controls, and the protective effect was stronger in men than in women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Joint risk factor control was significantly linked to a reduced fracture risk, and optimal management may eliminate the excess fracture risk associated with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"e3626-e3634"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Individuals with type 2 diabetes have a higher fracture risk than the general population. However, the association between joint risk factor control and fracture risk in this population remains unclear.

Objective: To investigate the extent to which joint risk factor control might attenuate the excess risk of fracture outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: We included 8935 individuals with type 2 diabetes and 35 740 matched controls without fractures at baseline from the UK Biobank (UKB), with a median follow-up of 12.1 years. Six modifiable risk factors were assessed: body mass index (BMI), physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations between risk factor control and fracture risk.

Results: Controlling each additional risk factor resulted in a 14% to 26% decrease in fracture risk. Optimal control (≥5 risk factors) correlated with a 50% reduction in overall fractures (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.33-0.75). However, a 60% reduction in hip fractures (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.98) was observed with the control of 4 risk factors. With control of 4 or more risk factors, fracture risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes was comparable to that of nondiabetic controls, and the protective effect was stronger in men than in women.

Conclusion: Joint risk factor control was significantly linked to a reduced fracture risk, and optimal management may eliminate the excess fracture risk associated with type 2 diabetes.

2型糖尿病患者关节危险因素控制程度和骨折事件结局
目的:探讨关节危险因素控制在多大程度上可能降低2型糖尿病患者骨折结局的过度风险。方法:我们从英国生物银行纳入8,935例2型糖尿病患者和35,740例基线无骨折的匹配对照,中位随访期为12.1年。评估了六个可改变的危险因素:体重指数(BMI)、体力活动、吸烟、饮酒、血清25-羟基维生素D [25(OH)D]和糖化血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)。Cox比例风险模型用于评估风险因素控制与骨折风险之间的关联。结果:控制每个额外的危险因素可使骨折风险降低14%至26%。最优控制(≥5个危险因素)与总骨折发生率降低50%相关(HR: 0.50;95% ci: 0.33-0.75)。然而,髋部骨折发生率降低60% (HR: 0.40;95% CI: 0.16-0.98),控制4个危险因素。在控制4种或更多危险因素的情况下,2型糖尿病患者的骨折风险与非糖尿病对照组相当,且男性的保护作用强于女性。结论:关节危险因素控制与骨折风险降低显著相关,优化管理可消除2型糖尿病相关的过度骨折风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信