Cross-cultural comparison of performance on the multicultural neuropsychological scale between participants from Argentina and the United States of America.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alberto Luis Fernandez, Bernice Marcopulos, David Hardy
{"title":"Cross-cultural comparison of performance on the multicultural neuropsychological scale between participants from Argentina and the United States of America.","authors":"Alberto Luis Fernandez, Bernice Marcopulos, David Hardy","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2473944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In a previous article the performance of two samples from Argentina and the USA on the Multicultural Neuropsychological Scale (MUNS) was compared. Although the results indicated no significant differences between them, the samples were rather small. In this article two larger samples from each country including two different locations in the USA were included. Moreover, additional psychometric cross-cultural analyses are presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Age and education-matched Argentinian (n = 80) and American (n = 50) samples of healthy adults were administered the MUNS. Argentinians were administered the Spanish version of the MUNS while North Americans were administered the English version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that t-tests revealed no significant differences between the samples across all subtests scores. Most correlations between demographic variables and subtest scores were non-significant across samples, with the exception of two weak correlations in the Argentinian sample. For both groups, scores were not significantly different between the male and female participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from this study confirm previous findings obtained with smaller samples suggesting some evidence of scalar equivalence across both versions of the MUNS.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2473944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In a previous article the performance of two samples from Argentina and the USA on the Multicultural Neuropsychological Scale (MUNS) was compared. Although the results indicated no significant differences between them, the samples were rather small. In this article two larger samples from each country including two different locations in the USA were included. Moreover, additional psychometric cross-cultural analyses are presented.

Methods: Age and education-matched Argentinian (n = 80) and American (n = 50) samples of healthy adults were administered the MUNS. Argentinians were administered the Spanish version of the MUNS while North Americans were administered the English version.

Results: Results showed that t-tests revealed no significant differences between the samples across all subtests scores. Most correlations between demographic variables and subtest scores were non-significant across samples, with the exception of two weak correlations in the Argentinian sample. For both groups, scores were not significantly different between the male and female participants.

Conclusions: The results from this study confirm previous findings obtained with smaller samples suggesting some evidence of scalar equivalence across both versions of the MUNS.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信