The Evolving Role of Lung Function Interpretation: Clinical Implications of the new ERS/ATS Standards in Asthma Care.

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
F García-Rio
{"title":"The Evolving Role of Lung Function Interpretation: Clinical Implications of the new ERS/ATS Standards in Asthma Care.","authors":"F García-Rio","doi":"10.18176/jiaci.1084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asthma remains a significant public health challenge, requiring precise diagnostic and management strategies. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are essential in assessing disease severity, guiding treatment decisions, and monitoring disease progression. The 2022 ERS/ATS technical standards introduced critical updates to enhance the accuracy and standardization of pulmonary function interpretation. These modifications include the adoption of Global Lung Initiative (GLI) reference values, the transition from race-based to race-neutral equations, the replacement of percent-predicted values with z-scores, and a redefinition of bronchodilator responsiveness criteria. Additionally, new spirometric patterns such as dysanaptic impairment and preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) have been recognized, improving the detection and characterization of airflow limitation. These updates significantly impact asthma management by refining disease phenotyping, improving diagnostic precision, and guiding more personalized treatment strategies. Furthermore, advancements in artificial intelligence are expected to enhance predictive analytics and early intervention strategies in pulmonary function assessment. However, challenges remain in the clinical adoption of these modifications, particularly regarding the classification of disease severity and the impact of race-neutral equations on diagnostic thresholds. Future research is necessary to validate the long-term implications of these changes on asthma outcomes. Clinicians must familiarize themselves with the evolving standards to optimize patient care and reduce health disparities. The 2022 ERS/ATS guidelines represent a substantial advancement in pulmonary function assessment, with the potential to improve both clinical decision-making and patient prognosis in asthma management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.1084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asthma remains a significant public health challenge, requiring precise diagnostic and management strategies. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are essential in assessing disease severity, guiding treatment decisions, and monitoring disease progression. The 2022 ERS/ATS technical standards introduced critical updates to enhance the accuracy and standardization of pulmonary function interpretation. These modifications include the adoption of Global Lung Initiative (GLI) reference values, the transition from race-based to race-neutral equations, the replacement of percent-predicted values with z-scores, and a redefinition of bronchodilator responsiveness criteria. Additionally, new spirometric patterns such as dysanaptic impairment and preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) have been recognized, improving the detection and characterization of airflow limitation. These updates significantly impact asthma management by refining disease phenotyping, improving diagnostic precision, and guiding more personalized treatment strategies. Furthermore, advancements in artificial intelligence are expected to enhance predictive analytics and early intervention strategies in pulmonary function assessment. However, challenges remain in the clinical adoption of these modifications, particularly regarding the classification of disease severity and the impact of race-neutral equations on diagnostic thresholds. Future research is necessary to validate the long-term implications of these changes on asthma outcomes. Clinicians must familiarize themselves with the evolving standards to optimize patient care and reduce health disparities. The 2022 ERS/ATS guidelines represent a substantial advancement in pulmonary function assessment, with the potential to improve both clinical decision-making and patient prognosis in asthma management.

肺功能解释的演变作用:新的ERS/ATS标准在哮喘治疗中的临床意义
哮喘仍然是一个重大的公共卫生挑战,需要精确的诊断和管理策略。肺功能测试(pft)在评估疾病严重程度、指导治疗决策和监测疾病进展方面至关重要。2022年ERS/ATS技术标准引入了关键的更新,以提高肺功能解释的准确性和标准化。这些修改包括采用全球肺倡议(GLI)参考值,从基于种族的方程过渡到种族中立的方程,用z分数代替百分比预测值,以及重新定义支气管扩张剂反应标准。此外,新的肺活量测量模式,如呼吸功能障碍和保存比例受损肺活量测量(PRISm)已被认可,改进了气流限制的检测和表征。这些更新通过改善疾病表型、提高诊断精度和指导更个性化的治疗策略,显著影响哮喘管理。此外,人工智能的进步有望增强肺功能评估的预测分析和早期干预策略。然而,这些修改的临床应用仍然存在挑战,特别是在疾病严重程度的分类和种族中立方程对诊断阈值的影响方面。未来的研究需要验证这些变化对哮喘结局的长期影响。临床医生必须熟悉不断发展的标准,以优化患者护理和减少健康差距。2022年ERS/ATS指南在肺功能评估方面取得了实质性进展,有可能改善哮喘管理的临床决策和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology (J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol) provides an attractive and very active forum for basic and clinical research in allergology and clinical immunology.Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology publishes original works, reviews, short communications and opinions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信