"My body my baby": a qualitative study examining drivers of infant-feeding choices among women living with HIV in Philadelphia, United States.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Martina Zapata Vaca, Chermiqua Rachelle Tsosie, Erin Logue-Chamberlain, Paulina Coutifaris, Theresa Christensen, Alexandria Bea Mabry, Ola Mohamed, Ellen Tedaldi, Emily A Oliver, William R Short, Elizabeth D Lowenthal
{"title":"\"My body my baby\": a qualitative study examining drivers of infant-feeding choices among women living with HIV in Philadelphia, United States.","authors":"Martina Zapata Vaca, Chermiqua Rachelle Tsosie, Erin Logue-Chamberlain, Paulina Coutifaris, Theresa Christensen, Alexandria Bea Mabry, Ola Mohamed, Ellen Tedaldi, Emily A Oliver, William R Short, Elizabeth D Lowenthal","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2025.2474666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Before national guidelines related to infant feeding among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in the United States were changed in 2023, PLHIV were discouraged from breastfeeding due to the potential risk of perinatal HIV transmission. Potential health benefits to both mother and child coupled with the ability to mitigate HIV transmission risk with modern treatments now make feeding decisions more complex for PLHIV. This study examined personal and social determinants of feeding choice among PLHIV in the Philadelphia area just prior to the change in national guidelines. In 2022 and 2023, we conducted in-depth interviews with 28 PLHIV between the ages of 18-50 years old that had previously given birth, 22 while living with HIV. Participants who gave birth while living with HIV expressed that they had not been given the choice to breastfeed. When probed about how they would consider choice in a hypothetical future pregnancy in the new guidelines era, participants' own knowledge and beliefs about what was best for their babies and themselves were consistently raised as the most influential factors. They relied strongly on their health providers for up-to-date knowledge. Advice from partners, family, and community was considered less influential for most.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2025.2474666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Before national guidelines related to infant feeding among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in the United States were changed in 2023, PLHIV were discouraged from breastfeeding due to the potential risk of perinatal HIV transmission. Potential health benefits to both mother and child coupled with the ability to mitigate HIV transmission risk with modern treatments now make feeding decisions more complex for PLHIV. This study examined personal and social determinants of feeding choice among PLHIV in the Philadelphia area just prior to the change in national guidelines. In 2022 and 2023, we conducted in-depth interviews with 28 PLHIV between the ages of 18-50 years old that had previously given birth, 22 while living with HIV. Participants who gave birth while living with HIV expressed that they had not been given the choice to breastfeed. When probed about how they would consider choice in a hypothetical future pregnancy in the new guidelines era, participants' own knowledge and beliefs about what was best for their babies and themselves were consistently raised as the most influential factors. They relied strongly on their health providers for up-to-date knowledge. Advice from partners, family, and community was considered less influential for most.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信