Wellbeing interventions in family medicine and general practice trainees: a preliminary meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Shaun Prentice, Divya Nitinkumar Patel, Diana Santa Dorstyn
{"title":"Wellbeing interventions in family medicine and general practice trainees: a preliminary meta-analysis.","authors":"Shaun Prentice, Divya Nitinkumar Patel, Diana Santa Dorstyn","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2025.2469494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical trainees experience occupational stress, prompting increasing research to explore wellbeing interventions. To date, few meta-analyses have evaluated intervention effects, and none have focused on trainees in family medicine or general practice (FM/GP), specifically. Aim: To synthesise available literature on psychosocial interventions to promote wellbeing, and subsequently reduce ill-being or burnout, among FM/GP specialty trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis were followed and online databases (Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Scopus) systematically searched (no date limits) for published studies and dissertations. The methodological quality of included studies was reviewed (Mixed Methods Appraisal tool, GRADE assessment), and pre-post changes (Hedges' <i>g</i>) pooled using random effects modelling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven independent studies, involving 182 FM/GP trainees, were included in this review. Evaluated studies varied in their design and the results were characterised by imprecision. Interventions differed in their content, delivery, and length. The data did not favour a single type of intervention, although supporting individuals to monitor their wellbeing did produce significant, positive effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a lack of evidence about the best ways to promote wellbeing in FM/GP trainees. Both the methodology and design of training and educational initiatives for FM/GP need careful consideration in order to progress this research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2025.2469494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical trainees experience occupational stress, prompting increasing research to explore wellbeing interventions. To date, few meta-analyses have evaluated intervention effects, and none have focused on trainees in family medicine or general practice (FM/GP), specifically. Aim: To synthesise available literature on psychosocial interventions to promote wellbeing, and subsequently reduce ill-being or burnout, among FM/GP specialty trainees.

Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis were followed and online databases (Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Scopus) systematically searched (no date limits) for published studies and dissertations. The methodological quality of included studies was reviewed (Mixed Methods Appraisal tool, GRADE assessment), and pre-post changes (Hedges' g) pooled using random effects modelling.

Results: Eleven independent studies, involving 182 FM/GP trainees, were included in this review. Evaluated studies varied in their design and the results were characterised by imprecision. Interventions differed in their content, delivery, and length. The data did not favour a single type of intervention, although supporting individuals to monitor their wellbeing did produce significant, positive effects.

Conclusions: There is a lack of evidence about the best ways to promote wellbeing in FM/GP trainees. Both the methodology and design of training and educational initiatives for FM/GP need careful consideration in order to progress this research.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信