COVID-19 vaccine uptake, barriers and associated factors among healthcare workers in Malawi.

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2025-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v16i1.676
Clara Sambani, Tonny Muwonge, Liness Chinyamunyamu, Amon Dembo, Mosoka P Fallah, Victor Chikwapulo, Mavuto Thomas, Charity Gondwe, Regina Mankhamba, Leah Mbabazi, Suzan Nakasendwa, Rodgers R Ayebare, Collins Mitambo, Matthew Kagoli, Dzinkambani Kambalame, Clement Seven, Tadala Mwale, Edna Mandala, Abigail Kazembe, McWilliam Kalua, Senga Sembuche, Elizabeth Gonese, Tamrat Shaweno, Nebiyu Dereje, Evelyn C Banda, Tajudeen Raji, Mitch Matoga
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine uptake, barriers and associated factors among healthcare workers in Malawi.","authors":"Clara Sambani, Tonny Muwonge, Liness Chinyamunyamu, Amon Dembo, Mosoka P Fallah, Victor Chikwapulo, Mavuto Thomas, Charity Gondwe, Regina Mankhamba, Leah Mbabazi, Suzan Nakasendwa, Rodgers R Ayebare, Collins Mitambo, Matthew Kagoli, Dzinkambani Kambalame, Clement Seven, Tadala Mwale, Edna Mandala, Abigail Kazembe, McWilliam Kalua, Senga Sembuche, Elizabeth Gonese, Tamrat Shaweno, Nebiyu Dereje, Evelyn C Banda, Tajudeen Raji, Mitch Matoga","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v16i1.676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic led to an urgent need for a global vaccine. Despite being a priority group, the vaccine uptake among healthcare workers (HCWs) remains low.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This article assessed the COVID-19 vaccine uptake and its associated barriers in Malawi.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among HCWs in Malawi's Blantyre, Lilongwe and Mzuzu districts from 11 April 2023 to 14 April 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Proportionally distributed among various cadres, 200 participants were randomly selected. A structured questionnaire was administered, assessing HCWs' uptake, willingness, attitudes and barriers to COVID-19 vaccines. Data were managed in REDCap and analysed using STATA version 14. Frequencies and percentages were computed. Variables with <i>p</i>-value ≤ 0.25 were included in the multivariable modified passion model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 (88%) participants received a single-dose vaccine, while only 11.5% received a booster. Vaccine uptake was associated with age groups 25-34 years (aPR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.21, 4.60) and 35-44 years (aPR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.18, 4.50), being a nurse/midwife (aPR = 0.86, CI: 0.74, 0.99) and laboratory personnel (aPR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.99). Unvaccinated HCWs were concerned about vaccine side effects and lacked trust in the development process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Issues of vaccine safety, side effects and lack of trust in the vaccine should be addressed. Promoting awareness of vaccine development and benefits, targeting all age groups and cadres, is required among HCWs.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The findings can be utilised to develop specific interventions on age and cadre to promote vaccine acceptance among HCWs, in countries with similar contextual settings to Malawi.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"16 1","pages":"676"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i1.676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to an urgent need for a global vaccine. Despite being a priority group, the vaccine uptake among healthcare workers (HCWs) remains low.

Aim: This article assessed the COVID-19 vaccine uptake and its associated barriers in Malawi.

Setting: A cross-sectional study was conducted among HCWs in Malawi's Blantyre, Lilongwe and Mzuzu districts from 11 April 2023 to 14 April 2023.

Methods: Proportionally distributed among various cadres, 200 participants were randomly selected. A structured questionnaire was administered, assessing HCWs' uptake, willingness, attitudes and barriers to COVID-19 vaccines. Data were managed in REDCap and analysed using STATA version 14. Frequencies and percentages were computed. Variables with p-value ≤ 0.25 were included in the multivariable modified passion model.

Results: A total of 175 (88%) participants received a single-dose vaccine, while only 11.5% received a booster. Vaccine uptake was associated with age groups 25-34 years (aPR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.21, 4.60) and 35-44 years (aPR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.18, 4.50), being a nurse/midwife (aPR = 0.86, CI: 0.74, 0.99) and laboratory personnel (aPR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.99). Unvaccinated HCWs were concerned about vaccine side effects and lacked trust in the development process.

Conclusion: Issues of vaccine safety, side effects and lack of trust in the vaccine should be addressed. Promoting awareness of vaccine development and benefits, targeting all age groups and cadres, is required among HCWs.

Contribution: The findings can be utilised to develop specific interventions on age and cadre to promote vaccine acceptance among HCWs, in countries with similar contextual settings to Malawi.

马拉维卫生保健工作者的COVID-19疫苗接种、障碍和相关因素
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行导致对全球疫苗的迫切需求。尽管是重点人群,但卫生保健工作者(HCWs)的疫苗接种率仍然很低。目的:本文评估了马拉维COVID-19疫苗接种情况及其相关障碍。环境:于2023年4月11日至14日在马拉维的Blantyre、Lilongwe和Mzuzu地区的卫生保健员中进行了一项横断面研究。方法:按比例在各类干部中随机抽取200人。采用结构化问卷,评估卫生保健工作者对COVID-19疫苗的接受情况、意愿、态度和障碍。数据在REDCap中进行管理,并使用STATA version 14进行分析。计算频率和百分比。将p值≤0.25的变量纳入多变量修正passion模型。结果:共有175名(88%)参与者接种了单剂疫苗,而只有11.5%的参与者接种了加强剂。疫苗接种与25-34岁年龄组(aPR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.21, 4.60)和35-44岁年龄组(aPR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.18, 4.50)、护士/助产士(aPR = 0.86, CI: 0.74, 0.99)和实验室人员(aPR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.99)相关。未接种疫苗的卫生保健员担心疫苗的副作用,并且对开发过程缺乏信任。结论:疫苗的安全性、副作用和对疫苗缺乏信任等问题应得到解决。卫生保健工作者需要以所有年龄组和干部为对象,提高对疫苗开发和效益的认识。贡献:研究结果可用于制定关于年龄和干部的具体干预措施,以促进与马拉维背景类似的国家卫生保健工作者接受疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信