COVID-19 vaccine uptake and associated factors among health workers in Kampala city, Uganda.

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v16i1.720
Moses Ocan, Maureen Katusiime, Daniel Kyabayinze, Benon Kwesiga, Rodgers Ayebare, Suzan Nakasendwa, Leah Mbabazi, Henry K Bosa, Hellen Nansiiro, Daphine Sanger, Mordecai Tayebwa, Boniconsilli Tusiime, Agnes Kiragga, Francis Kakooza, Elizabeth Gonese, Tamrat Shaweno, Nebiyu Dereje, Mosoka P Fallah, Alex R Ario
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine uptake and associated factors among health workers in Kampala city, Uganda.","authors":"Moses Ocan, Maureen Katusiime, Daniel Kyabayinze, Benon Kwesiga, Rodgers Ayebare, Suzan Nakasendwa, Leah Mbabazi, Henry K Bosa, Hellen Nansiiro, Daphine Sanger, Mordecai Tayebwa, Boniconsilli Tusiime, Agnes Kiragga, Francis Kakooza, Elizabeth Gonese, Tamrat Shaweno, Nebiyu Dereje, Mosoka P Fallah, Alex R Ario","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v16i1.720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is crucial for healthcare workers (HCWs) and understanding their perspectives is vital for promoting vaccine uptake in communities.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake among HCWs in Kampala, Uganda.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A cross-sectional study was done in seven high-volume health facilities in Kampala.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire based on the Behavioural and Social Drivers Model was administered to 200 HCWs. Data were analysed using STATA version 17 to identify associations with vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall vaccination uptake was 65.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.1, 71.8), with 17.7% (95% CI: 12.6, 23.7) having received a booster dose. Concerns about safety and side effects were the primary reasons for vaccine hesitancy. While HCWs generally believed that getting vaccinated for diseases such as measles and tuberculosis can help prevent sickness or death, with 70.5% (<i>n</i> = 141/200) strongly agreeing, only 48% (<i>n</i> = 96/200) of HCWs strongly agreed that vaccination against COVID-19 can reduce the risk of illness or death. Age, profession and facility type were associated with vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare workers in Kampala had high vaccine uptake, but safety concerns remain. Targeted communication strategies from the Ministry of Health are needed to address these concerns and further increase vaccine confidence.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study reveals specific reasons for vaccine hesitancy among HCWs in an African urban setting. These insights inform interventions to improve vaccine uptake in this key population.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"16 1","pages":"720"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i1.720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is crucial for healthcare workers (HCWs) and understanding their perspectives is vital for promoting vaccine uptake in communities.

Aim: This study assessed factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake among HCWs in Kampala, Uganda.

Setting: A cross-sectional study was done in seven high-volume health facilities in Kampala.

Methods: A questionnaire based on the Behavioural and Social Drivers Model was administered to 200 HCWs. Data were analysed using STATA version 17 to identify associations with vaccination status.

Results: Overall vaccination uptake was 65.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.1, 71.8), with 17.7% (95% CI: 12.6, 23.7) having received a booster dose. Concerns about safety and side effects were the primary reasons for vaccine hesitancy. While HCWs generally believed that getting vaccinated for diseases such as measles and tuberculosis can help prevent sickness or death, with 70.5% (n = 141/200) strongly agreeing, only 48% (n = 96/200) of HCWs strongly agreed that vaccination against COVID-19 can reduce the risk of illness or death. Age, profession and facility type were associated with vaccination status.

Conclusion: Healthcare workers in Kampala had high vaccine uptake, but safety concerns remain. Targeted communication strategies from the Ministry of Health are needed to address these concerns and further increase vaccine confidence.

Contribution: This study reveals specific reasons for vaccine hesitancy among HCWs in an African urban setting. These insights inform interventions to improve vaccine uptake in this key population.

乌干达坎帕拉市卫生工作者中COVID-19疫苗接种情况及相关因素
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗接种对卫生保健工作者(HCWs)至关重要,了解他们的观点对于促进社区疫苗接种至关重要。目的:本研究评估了乌干达坎帕拉市卫生保健工作者COVID-19疫苗接种的影响因素。环境:在坎帕拉的七个高容量卫生设施中进行了横断面研究。方法:采用基于行为和社会驱动因素模型的问卷调查方法对200名卫生保健工作者进行问卷调查。使用STATA版本17对数据进行分析,以确定与疫苗接种状况的关联。结果:总体疫苗接种率为65.2%(95%可信区间[CI]: 58.1, 71.8),其中17.7% (95% CI: 12.6, 23.7)接种了加强剂。对安全性和副作用的担忧是疫苗犹豫的主要原因。虽然卫生保健工作者普遍认为接种麻疹和结核病等疾病疫苗有助于预防疾病或死亡,70.5% (n = 141/200)的卫生保健工作者强烈同意,但只有48% (n = 96/200)的卫生保健工作者强烈同意接种COVID-19疫苗可以降低疾病或死亡的风险。年龄、职业和设施类型与疫苗接种状况相关。结论:坎帕拉的卫生保健工作者疫苗接种率很高,但安全问题仍然存在。需要卫生部制定有针对性的传播战略,以解决这些问题并进一步增强对疫苗的信心。贡献:本研究揭示了非洲城市环境中卫生保健工作者对疫苗犹豫的具体原因。这些见解为干预措施提供了信息,以提高这一关键人群的疫苗吸收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信