Knowledge differences on the impact of age on fertility among fertile and subfertile women.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Waranya Rugfoong, Jamjit Doungpunta, Natpat Jansaka, Usanee Sanmee
{"title":"Knowledge differences on the impact of age on fertility among fertile and subfertile women.","authors":"Waranya Rugfoong, Jamjit Doungpunta, Natpat Jansaka, Usanee Sanmee","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the knowledge concerning the impact of age on fertility in Thai women among fertile and subfertile women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand. The questionnaires consisted of sociodemographic questions and knowledge pertinent to the impact of age on fertility. Both fertile and subfertile women completed the same questionnaire anonymously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 500 women were included in the study, with two hundred and fifty in each group. The majority of women in both the fertile and subfertile group correctly identified the most fertile age of women (84.8% vs. 84.4%, p=0.902) and the impact of age on infertility treatment (73.2% vs. 84.0%, p=0.003). However, only one-fifth of the participants in both groups correctly identified the age that their fertility starts to decline, show a marked decline and ends. Most women in both groups chose the answer that overestimates their fertility potential. Moreover, 10.8% of subfertile women believed that fertility is not dependent on age and 16.0% believed that age does not affect the success rate of infertility treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall knowledge of women regarding the impact of age on fertility is relatively poor with no difference between fertile and subfertile women. These findings may indicate an urgent need to increase this area of knowledge in the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the knowledge concerning the impact of age on fertility in Thai women among fertile and subfertile women.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand. The questionnaires consisted of sociodemographic questions and knowledge pertinent to the impact of age on fertility. Both fertile and subfertile women completed the same questionnaire anonymously.

Results: A total of 500 women were included in the study, with two hundred and fifty in each group. The majority of women in both the fertile and subfertile group correctly identified the most fertile age of women (84.8% vs. 84.4%, p=0.902) and the impact of age on infertility treatment (73.2% vs. 84.0%, p=0.003). However, only one-fifth of the participants in both groups correctly identified the age that their fertility starts to decline, show a marked decline and ends. Most women in both groups chose the answer that overestimates their fertility potential. Moreover, 10.8% of subfertile women believed that fertility is not dependent on age and 16.0% believed that age does not affect the success rate of infertility treatment.

Conclusions: The overall knowledge of women regarding the impact of age on fertility is relatively poor with no difference between fertile and subfertile women. These findings may indicate an urgent need to increase this area of knowledge in the population.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信