Edson Borges, Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga, Patricia Guilherme, Assumpto Iaconelli, Amanda Sousa Setti
{"title":"Morphokinetic embryo behaviour in low-prognosis patients according to the POSEIDON criteria: an analysis of 3326 injected oocytes.","authors":"Edson Borges, Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga, Patricia Guilherme, Assumpto Iaconelli, Amanda Sousa Setti","doi":"10.1017/S0967199424000480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this cohort study was to investigate whether embryo quality and morphokinetic behaviour differ in the four groups of low-prognosis women as stratified by the POSEIDON criteria. The study was performed in a private university-affiliated <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF) centre, and included 3326 injected oocytes from 846 women undergoing ICSI cycles between March 2019 and April 2022. Kinetic markers from the point of insemination were recorded in the EmbryoScope incubator. Generalized mixed models followed by Bonferroni post hoc were used to compare morphokinetics among the POSEIDON groups. Embryos derived from patients in the POSEIDON groups 2, 3 and 4 showed significantly slower divisions compared to those from POSEIDON 1 group. The KIDScore rank was significantly lower for embryos deriving from POSEIDON groups 2, 3 and 4 (2: 4.4 ± 0.7 vs. 3: 4.2 ± 0.2 vs. 4: 3.0 ± 0.4) compared to those deriving from POSEIDON 1 group (4.8 ± 0.1, p < 0.001). Group POSEIDON 1 showed improved implantation (26.9% vs. 2: 22.4% vs. 3: 20.0% vs. 4: 14.0, p < 0.001) and miscarriage rates (5.6% vs. 2: 31.2% vs. 4: 50.0%, p = 0.013). Embryo quality and morphokinetic behaviour differ across the POSEIDON groups, being more favourable in POSEIDON group 1, as well as implantation and miscarriage rates. Embryo development was more favourable in POSEIDON group 1 (young age and adequate ovarian reserve), suggesting that oocyte quality is determinant of embryo developmental potential. These findings show the reasonability of classifying POR by the POSEIDON criteria and provide information for counselling of POR regarding their possible prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":24075,"journal":{"name":"Zygote","volume":" ","pages":"56-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zygote","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199424000480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this cohort study was to investigate whether embryo quality and morphokinetic behaviour differ in the four groups of low-prognosis women as stratified by the POSEIDON criteria. The study was performed in a private university-affiliated in vitro fertilization (IVF) centre, and included 3326 injected oocytes from 846 women undergoing ICSI cycles between March 2019 and April 2022. Kinetic markers from the point of insemination were recorded in the EmbryoScope incubator. Generalized mixed models followed by Bonferroni post hoc were used to compare morphokinetics among the POSEIDON groups. Embryos derived from patients in the POSEIDON groups 2, 3 and 4 showed significantly slower divisions compared to those from POSEIDON 1 group. The KIDScore rank was significantly lower for embryos deriving from POSEIDON groups 2, 3 and 4 (2: 4.4 ± 0.7 vs. 3: 4.2 ± 0.2 vs. 4: 3.0 ± 0.4) compared to those deriving from POSEIDON 1 group (4.8 ± 0.1, p < 0.001). Group POSEIDON 1 showed improved implantation (26.9% vs. 2: 22.4% vs. 3: 20.0% vs. 4: 14.0, p < 0.001) and miscarriage rates (5.6% vs. 2: 31.2% vs. 4: 50.0%, p = 0.013). Embryo quality and morphokinetic behaviour differ across the POSEIDON groups, being more favourable in POSEIDON group 1, as well as implantation and miscarriage rates. Embryo development was more favourable in POSEIDON group 1 (young age and adequate ovarian reserve), suggesting that oocyte quality is determinant of embryo developmental potential. These findings show the reasonability of classifying POR by the POSEIDON criteria and provide information for counselling of POR regarding their possible prognosis.
本队列研究的目的是研究按POSEIDON标准分层的四组低预后妇女的胚胎质量和形态动力学行为是否存在差异。该研究是在一所私立大学附属的体外受精(IVF)中心进行的,研究对象包括2019年3月至2022年4月期间接受ICSI周期的846名女性的3326个注射卵母细胞。在EmbryoScope培养箱中记录授精点的动态标记。采用Bonferroni post hoc的广义混合模型来比较波塞冬各组之间的形态动力学。与来自POSEIDON 1组的患者相比,来自POSEIDON 2、3和4组患者的胚胎的分裂速度明显减慢。POSEIDON 2、3、4组胚胎的KIDScore评分(2∶4.4±0.7∶3∶4.2±0.2∶4∶3.0±0.4)显著低于POSEIDON 1组(4.8±0.1,p < 0.001)。POSEIDON 1组的着床率(26.9% vs. 22.4% vs. 3:20.0% vs. 4:14.0, p < 0.001)和流产率(5.6% vs. 2:31.2% vs. 4:50.0%, p = 0.013)均有改善。胚胎质量和形态动力学行为在波塞冬组中有所不同,波塞冬组1的胚胎质量和形态动力学行为更有利,着床率和流产率也不同。波塞冬1组的胚胎发育更有利(年龄小,卵巢储备充足),表明卵母细胞质量是胚胎发育潜力的决定因素。这些结果显示了以POSEIDON标准对POR进行分类的合理性,并为POR的预后咨询提供了信息。
期刊介绍:
An international journal dedicated to the rapid publication of original research in early embryology, Zygote covers interdisciplinary studies on gametogenesis through fertilization to gastrulation in animals and humans. The scope has been expanded to include clinical papers, molecular and developmental genetics. The editors will favour work describing fundamental processes in the cellular and molecular mechanisms of animal development, and, in particular, the identification of unifying principles in biology. Nonetheless, new technologies, review articles, debates and letters will become a prominent feature.