Forget It: Reading with an IUD.

IF 1.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lilith Todd
{"title":"Forget It: Reading with an IUD.","authors":"Lilith Todd","doi":"10.1007/s10912-024-09909-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exposing the insides of the reproductive body visually and narratively has been a long project that has had positive and negative effects on a person's control over their choice to or not to have a child, as historians of medicine, reproduction, and the body have told us and as feminist health advocates have long insisted. The intrauterine device is a relatively new contraceptive technology that, once inserted, promises the user that they may prevent pregnancy while forgetting about the device. This essay examines how this \"forgetting\" method of relating to conception bumps up against historical circumstances and narrative structures that aim to expose and make legible the reproductive body. In this case, that exposure is to reveal the acute pain of the shifting political circumstances of birth control access. It ultimately proposes that forgetting, which is figured here as accepting limited knowledge and choosing not to read the reproductive body, produces its own dilemma: at once, the user is exempt from such day-to-day worries and denied certainty over fertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":45518,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-024-09909-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposing the insides of the reproductive body visually and narratively has been a long project that has had positive and negative effects on a person's control over their choice to or not to have a child, as historians of medicine, reproduction, and the body have told us and as feminist health advocates have long insisted. The intrauterine device is a relatively new contraceptive technology that, once inserted, promises the user that they may prevent pregnancy while forgetting about the device. This essay examines how this "forgetting" method of relating to conception bumps up against historical circumstances and narrative structures that aim to expose and make legible the reproductive body. In this case, that exposure is to reveal the acute pain of the shifting political circumstances of birth control access. It ultimately proposes that forgetting, which is figured here as accepting limited knowledge and choosing not to read the reproductive body, produces its own dilemma: at once, the user is exempt from such day-to-day worries and denied certainty over fertility.

忘了它吧:带着宫内节育器阅读。
医学、生殖和身体的历史学家告诉我们,女权主义健康倡导者长期以来坚持认为,以视觉和叙事的方式暴露生殖身体的内部是一项长期的工程,对一个人控制自己是否要孩子的选择有积极和消极的影响。宫内节育器是一种相对较新的避孕技术,一旦插入,就向使用者承诺他们可以在忘记避孕装置的同时防止怀孕。这篇文章探讨了这种与受孕有关的“遗忘”方法是如何与旨在揭示和解读生殖身体的历史环境和叙事结构相抵触的。在这种情况下,这种曝光是为了揭示避孕途径的政治环境变化带来的剧烈痛苦。它最终提出,遗忘,在这里被认为是接受有限的知识,选择不去阅读生殖体,产生了自己的困境:用户立即从日常的担忧中解脱出来,并否认了生育能力的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Humanities
Journal of Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Humanities publishes original papers that reflect its enlarged focus on interdisciplinary inquiry in medicine and medical education. Such inquiry can emerge in the following ways: (1) from the medical humanities, which includes literature, history, philosophy, and bioethics as well as those areas of the social and behavioral sciences that have strong humanistic traditions; (2) from cultural studies, a multidisciplinary activity involving the humanities; women''s, African-American, and other critical studies; media studies and popular culture; and sociology and anthropology, which can be used to examine medical institutions, practice and education with a special focus on relations of power; and (3) from pedagogical perspectives that elucidate what and how knowledge is made and valued in medicine, how that knowledge is expressed and transmitted, and the ideological basis of medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信