Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Light-curable Tricalcium Silicate Cement as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Q3 Dentistry
Shreyal N Deshmukh, Vanitha U Shenoy, Sumanthini V Margasahayam, Gaurav U Chaudhri
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Light-curable Tricalcium Silicate Cement as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Shreyal N Deshmukh, Vanitha U Shenoy, Sumanthini V Margasahayam, Gaurav U Chaudhri","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aims to assess the long-term clinical outcomes and biocompatibility of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and light-curable tricalcium silicate cement in preserving pulp vitality and preventing further carious progression in deep carious lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 46 participants with deep carious lesions and reversible pulpitis were selected and divided into two groups (<i>n</i> = 23): Group I was treated with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and group II was treated with TheraCal LC (a light-curable tricalcium silicate cement). Once the indirect pulp capping (IPC) material was placed on the pulpal/axial walls, the cavity was temporized using intermediate restorative material, while the permanent restoration was done at 3rd-week recall period. Clinical and radiographic assessments were evaluated at intervals of 24 hours, 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Data were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores for the RMGIC group were 20.21, 12.90, 1.33, 0.00, and 0.00 at baseline, 24 hours, 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively, while the TheraCal LC group showed mean scores of 12.60, 5.95, 2.58, 1.50, and 0.00 at the same intervals. The Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test revealed no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at any time point (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Intragroup comparisons using the Friedman test indicated statistically significant reductions in VAS scores over time within both groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). At the 6-month follow-up, there were no significant differences between the groups regarding pain on palpation, swelling, percussion, or mobility (<i>p</i> > 0.05 for all comparisons using the Chi-square test). All teeth in the RMGIC group remained vital at the end of the study, while the vitality rate in the TheraCal LC group was 81%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded that both RMGIC and TheraCal LC are effective as IPC materials for deep carious lesions with reversible pulpitis, though RMGIC showed a slight advantage in maintaining pulp vitality, reducing symptoms, and minimizing periapical changes over time.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The clinical significance of this study is to offer evidence-based guidance for dental practitioners in choosing suitable materials for IPC in cases of deep carious lesions with reversible pulpitis. This research aims to support clinicians in making informed decisions that promote optimal patient care and improve the success and longevity of restorative treatments. How to cite this article: Deshmukh SN, Shenoy VU, Margasahayam SV, <i>et al</i>. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Light-curable Tricalcium Silicate Cement as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(12):1141-1147.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 12","pages":"1141-1147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The study aims to assess the long-term clinical outcomes and biocompatibility of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and light-curable tricalcium silicate cement in preserving pulp vitality and preventing further carious progression in deep carious lesions.

Materials and methods: A total of 46 participants with deep carious lesions and reversible pulpitis were selected and divided into two groups (n = 23): Group I was treated with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and group II was treated with TheraCal LC (a light-curable tricalcium silicate cement). Once the indirect pulp capping (IPC) material was placed on the pulpal/axial walls, the cavity was temporized using intermediate restorative material, while the permanent restoration was done at 3rd-week recall period. Clinical and radiographic assessments were evaluated at intervals of 24 hours, 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Data were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results: The mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores for the RMGIC group were 20.21, 12.90, 1.33, 0.00, and 0.00 at baseline, 24 hours, 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively, while the TheraCal LC group showed mean scores of 12.60, 5.95, 2.58, 1.50, and 0.00 at the same intervals. The Mann-Whitney U-test revealed no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at any time point (p > 0.05). Intragroup comparisons using the Friedman test indicated statistically significant reductions in VAS scores over time within both groups (p < 0.001). At the 6-month follow-up, there were no significant differences between the groups regarding pain on palpation, swelling, percussion, or mobility (p > 0.05 for all comparisons using the Chi-square test). All teeth in the RMGIC group remained vital at the end of the study, while the vitality rate in the TheraCal LC group was 81%.

Conclusion: The study concluded that both RMGIC and TheraCal LC are effective as IPC materials for deep carious lesions with reversible pulpitis, though RMGIC showed a slight advantage in maintaining pulp vitality, reducing symptoms, and minimizing periapical changes over time.

Clinical significance: The clinical significance of this study is to offer evidence-based guidance for dental practitioners in choosing suitable materials for IPC in cases of deep carious lesions with reversible pulpitis. This research aims to support clinicians in making informed decisions that promote optimal patient care and improve the success and longevity of restorative treatments. How to cite this article: Deshmukh SN, Shenoy VU, Margasahayam SV, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Light-curable Tricalcium Silicate Cement as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(12):1141-1147.

目的:该研究旨在评估树脂改性玻璃离子粘固剂和光固化硅酸三钙粘固剂在保护牙髓活力和防止深龋病变进一步龋坏方面的长期临床效果和生物相容性:选取 46 名患有深龋病变和可逆性牙髓炎的患者,将其分为两组(n = 23):I组使用树脂改性玻璃离子水泥(RMGIC)治疗,II组使用TheraCal LC(一种光固化硅酸三钙水泥)治疗。在牙髓/轴壁上放置间接盖髓(IPC)材料后,使用中间修复材料对龋洞进行临时修复,并在第三周复诊时进行永久修复。每隔 24 小时、3 周、3 个月和 6 个月进行一次临床和放射学评估。对数据进行了记录和统计分析:结果:RMGIC 组在基线、24 小时、3 周、3 个月和 6 个月的平均视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分分别为 20.21、12.90、1.33、0.00 和 0.00,而 TheraCal LC 组在相同时间间隔的平均评分分别为 12.60、5.95、2.58、1.50 和 0.00。Mann-Whitney U 检验显示,两组在任何时间点的 VAS 评分均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。使用弗里德曼检验进行的组内比较显示,两组的 VAS 评分均随时间推移出现了统计学意义上的显著下降(P < 0.001)。在 6 个月的随访中,两组在触痛、肿胀、叩击或活动度方面没有明显差异(采用卡方检验进行的所有比较中,P > 0.05)。研究结束时,RMGIC 组的所有牙齿都保持活力,而 TheraCal LC 组的活力率为 81%:研究结论:RMGIC 和 TheraCal LC 都是治疗可逆性牙髓炎深龋病变的有效 IPC 材料,但 RMGIC 在保持牙髓活力、减轻症状和减少根尖周围长期变化方面略胜一筹:本研究的临床意义在于为牙科医生提供循证指导,帮助他们在深龋病变伴可逆性牙髓炎的病例中选择合适的IPC材料。这项研究旨在帮助临床医师做出明智的决定,促进最佳的患者护理,提高修复治疗的成功率和寿命。如何引用本文:Deshmukh SN, Shenoy VU, Margasahayam SV, et al. Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Light-curable Tricalcium Silicate Cement as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials:随机临床试验。J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(12):1141-1147.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信