A real-world study of the efficacy of second-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices after progression on first-line lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Saifeng Li, Qin Wen, Wenwu Huang, Zeyu Qiu, Long Feng, Fengming Yi
{"title":"A real-world study of the efficacy of second-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices after progression on first-line lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor.","authors":"Saifeng Li, Qin Wen, Wenwu Huang, Zeyu Qiu, Long Feng, Fengming Yi","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03742-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The incidence and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma are still high according to National Cancer Center of China. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has become one of the standard regimens for the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, some patients still use lenvatinib in combination with immunotherapy instead of a standard \"atezolizumab-bevacizumab\" regimen as a lower risk of bleeding in patients with esophagogastric varices. However, there is no evidence for second-line therapy after progression on lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma till now. Herein, we aim to investigate second-line treatment among these patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Thirty-three patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices were admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2019 to December 2023. They were treated with lenvatinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor as first line. The efficacy was conducted according to the RECIST1.1 criteria. The endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median overall survival (OS), and median progression free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 225 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices who received first-line lenvatinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor, of whom 33 (14.7%) received second-line therapy. 21 patients (63.6%) were treated with regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitor, 6 patients (18.2%) with apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor, 4 patients (12.1%) with bevacizumab plus PD-1 inhibitor, and the remaining 2 patients with regorafenib or sorafenib as monotherapy, respectively. Of the 33 patients, 2 (6.1%) were evaluated as partial response (PR), 16 (48.5%) had stable disease (SD), and 15 (45.4%) experienced progression (PD). The ORR was 6.1%, and the DCR was 54.6%. Median PFS was 4.5 months, median OS was 7.2 months, and the 12-month OS rate was 27.3%. Overall survival follow-up was done in 37 patients without second line treatment whose baseline levels were matched with those of the treatment group. The OS was 7.2 months in second line treatment group versus 3.0 months in control group (p = 0.04). As for different treatments in a second line, The ORR of regorafenib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor was 9.5%, the DCR was 47.6%, the median PFS was 4.2 months, and the median OS was 5.9 months. None of the patients treated with apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor got PR, the DCR was 83.3%, the median PFS was 8.7 months, and the median OS was 9.1 months. None of the patients treated with bevacizumab plus PD-1 inhibitor got PR, the DCR was 25.0%, the median PFS was 2.2 months, and the median OS was 6.0 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The second-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices after progression on first-line lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor is effective. Regorafenib or apatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor might be the preferred options.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03742-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The incidence and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma are still high according to National Cancer Center of China. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has become one of the standard regimens for the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, some patients still use lenvatinib in combination with immunotherapy instead of a standard "atezolizumab-bevacizumab" regimen as a lower risk of bleeding in patients with esophagogastric varices. However, there is no evidence for second-line therapy after progression on lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma till now. Herein, we aim to investigate second-line treatment among these patients.

Patients and methods: Thirty-three patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices were admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2019 to December 2023. They were treated with lenvatinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor as first line. The efficacy was conducted according to the RECIST1.1 criteria. The endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median overall survival (OS), and median progression free survival (PFS).

Results: We identified a total of 225 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices who received first-line lenvatinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor, of whom 33 (14.7%) received second-line therapy. 21 patients (63.6%) were treated with regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitor, 6 patients (18.2%) with apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor, 4 patients (12.1%) with bevacizumab plus PD-1 inhibitor, and the remaining 2 patients with regorafenib or sorafenib as monotherapy, respectively. Of the 33 patients, 2 (6.1%) were evaluated as partial response (PR), 16 (48.5%) had stable disease (SD), and 15 (45.4%) experienced progression (PD). The ORR was 6.1%, and the DCR was 54.6%. Median PFS was 4.5 months, median OS was 7.2 months, and the 12-month OS rate was 27.3%. Overall survival follow-up was done in 37 patients without second line treatment whose baseline levels were matched with those of the treatment group. The OS was 7.2 months in second line treatment group versus 3.0 months in control group (p = 0.04). As for different treatments in a second line, The ORR of regorafenib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor was 9.5%, the DCR was 47.6%, the median PFS was 4.2 months, and the median OS was 5.9 months. None of the patients treated with apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor got PR, the DCR was 83.3%, the median PFS was 8.7 months, and the median OS was 9.1 months. None of the patients treated with bevacizumab plus PD-1 inhibitor got PR, the DCR was 25.0%, the median PFS was 2.2 months, and the median OS was 6.0 months.

Conclusion: The second-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with esophagogastric varices after progression on first-line lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor is effective. Regorafenib or apatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor might be the preferred options.

一线lenvatinib联合PD-1抑制剂治疗进展后不可切除的肝细胞癌伴食管胃静脉曲张的二线治疗疗效的现实研究。
目的:根据中国国家癌症中心的数据,肝细胞癌的发病率和死亡率仍然很高。Atezolizumab联合贝伐单抗已成为一线治疗不可切除肝癌的标准方案之一。然而,一些患者仍然使用lenvatinib联合免疫治疗,而不是标准的“atezolizumab-bevacizumab”方案,以降低食管胃静脉曲张患者出血的风险。然而,目前尚无证据表明lenvatinib联合PD-1抑制剂治疗不可切除肝癌进展后的二线治疗。在此,我们的目标是研究这些患者的二线治疗。患者与方法:2019年1月至2023年12月南昌大学第二附属医院收治不可切除肝癌合并食管胃静脉曲张患者33例。以lenvatinib联合PD-1抑制剂作为一线治疗。按照RECIST1.1标准进行疗效评估。终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、中位总生存期(OS)和中位无进展生存期(PFS)。结果:共225例不可切除的肝细胞癌合并食管胃静脉曲张患者接受一线lenvatinib联合PD-1抑制剂治疗,其中33例(14.7%)接受二线治疗。瑞非尼联合PD-1抑制剂21例(63.6%),阿帕替尼联合PD-1抑制剂6例(18.2%),贝伐单抗联合PD-1抑制剂4例(12.1%),其余2例分别采用瑞非尼或索拉非尼单药治疗。在33例患者中,2例(6.1%)被评估为部分缓解(PR), 16例(48.5%)病情稳定(SD), 15例(45.4%)出现进展(PD)。ORR为6.1%,DCR为54.6%。中位PFS为4.5个月,中位OS为7.2个月,12个月OS率为27.3%。对37例未接受二线治疗的患者进行了总体生存随访,其基线水平与治疗组相匹配。二线治疗组总生存期为7.2个月,对照组为3.0个月(p = 0.04)。二线治疗中,瑞非尼联合PD-1抑制剂的ORR为9.5%,DCR为47.6%,中位PFS为4.2个月,中位OS为5.9个月。阿帕替尼联合PD-1抑制剂治疗的患者均无PR, DCR为83.3%,中位PFS为8.7个月,中位OS为9.1个月。贝伐单抗联合PD-1抑制剂治疗的患者均无PR, DCR为25.0%,中位PFS为2.2个月,中位OS为6.0个月。结论:一线lenvatinib联合PD-1抑制剂治疗进展后不能切除的肝癌伴食管胃静脉曲张的二线治疗是有效的。瑞非尼或阿帕替尼联合PD-1抑制剂可能是首选方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信