Do safety data sheets (SDS) and chemical labels effectively communicate safety hazards and precautions? An initial appraisal report with special reference to reproductive toxicant chemicals used in biotechnology applications.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ranil Kavindra Asela Kularatne
{"title":"Do safety data sheets (SDS) and chemical labels effectively communicate safety hazards and precautions? An initial appraisal report with special reference to reproductive toxicant chemicals used in biotechnology applications.","authors":"Ranil Kavindra Asela Kularatne","doi":"10.1177/07482337251320750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents a preliminary commentary on the Safety Data Sheets (SDS) and chemical labels of reproductive toxicant chemicals frequently used in biotechnology laboratories. This included six chemicals (chloroform, acrylamide, cobalt chloride hexahydrate, dimethyl formamide, boric acid, and 6-benzylaminopurine) and the main chemical mixture (comprising 60-100% formamide by weight) used in next sequencing generation (NGS). Section 2 (hazard identification), Section 3 (composition), Section 4 (first aid measures and reported health effects), Section 8 (recommended engineering controls and personnel protective equipment/PPE), and Section 11 (toxicological information) of the SDS were evaluated. SDS exhibited some inadequacies with a few inaccuracies and unspecific information in the hazard classifications. Description of the prevention precautionary statements was poor in the SDS. Irrespective of the described health hazards, all SDS described the first aid measures to be taken for all routes of chemical exposure. SDS of the reviewed chemicals and mixtures are not providing enough information relating to occupational health and safety aspects. Recommendations to assess the ways in which SDS and chemical labels are written, monitored, regulated, and used are suggested in this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":23171,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology and Industrial Health","volume":" ","pages":"7482337251320750"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology and Industrial Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07482337251320750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a preliminary commentary on the Safety Data Sheets (SDS) and chemical labels of reproductive toxicant chemicals frequently used in biotechnology laboratories. This included six chemicals (chloroform, acrylamide, cobalt chloride hexahydrate, dimethyl formamide, boric acid, and 6-benzylaminopurine) and the main chemical mixture (comprising 60-100% formamide by weight) used in next sequencing generation (NGS). Section 2 (hazard identification), Section 3 (composition), Section 4 (first aid measures and reported health effects), Section 8 (recommended engineering controls and personnel protective equipment/PPE), and Section 11 (toxicological information) of the SDS were evaluated. SDS exhibited some inadequacies with a few inaccuracies and unspecific information in the hazard classifications. Description of the prevention precautionary statements was poor in the SDS. Irrespective of the described health hazards, all SDS described the first aid measures to be taken for all routes of chemical exposure. SDS of the reviewed chemicals and mixtures are not providing enough information relating to occupational health and safety aspects. Recommendations to assess the ways in which SDS and chemical labels are written, monitored, regulated, and used are suggested in this paper.

安全数据表(SDS)和化学品标签是否有效传达了安全危害和预防措施?特别针对生物技术应用中使用的生殖毒性化学品的初步评估报告。
本文对生物技术实验室中常用的生殖毒性化学物质的安全数据表(SDS)和化学标签作了初步评述。这包括六种化学物质(氯仿、丙烯酰胺、六水氯化钴、二甲基甲酰胺、硼酸和6-苄基氨基嘌呤)和下一代测序(NGS)中使用的主要化学混合物(按重量计含有60-100%甲酰胺)。对SDS的第2节(危害识别)、第3节(组成)、第4节(急救措施和报告的健康影响)、第8节(建议的工程控制和人员防护设备/PPE)和第11节(毒理学信息)进行了评估。SDS显示出一些不足之处,在危害分类中有一些不准确和不具体的信息。SDS中对预防预防说明的描述较差。无论所描述的健康危害如何,所有SDS都描述了针对所有化学品接触途径应采取的急救措施。所审查化学品和混合物的SDS未提供与职业健康和安全方面有关的足够信息。建议评估SDS和化学标签的编写、监测、管理和使用方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Toxicology & Industrial Health is a journal dedicated to reporting results of basic and applied toxicological research with direct application to industrial/occupational health. Such research includes the fields of genetic and cellular toxicology and risk assessment associated with hazardous wastes and groundwater.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信