The association between articular calcium crystal deposition and knee osteoarthritis, joint pain and inflammation: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Skeletal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s00256-025-04904-7
Camilla Toft Nielsen, Marius Henriksen, Cecilie Laubjerg Daugaard, Janus Uhd Nybing, Philip Hansen, Felix Müller, Henning Bliddal, Mikael Boesen, Henrik Gudbergsen
{"title":"The association between articular calcium crystal deposition and knee osteoarthritis, joint pain and inflammation: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Camilla Toft Nielsen, Marius Henriksen, Cecilie Laubjerg Daugaard, Janus Uhd Nybing, Philip Hansen, Felix Müller, Henning Bliddal, Mikael Boesen, Henrik Gudbergsen","doi":"10.1007/s00256-025-04904-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore in a cross-sectional fashion if overweight individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and intraarticular calcium crystal (CaC) deposits experience more knee joint inflammation and knee pain compared with individuals without CaC deposits.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>We used pre-randomization imaging data from an RCT, the LOSE-IT trial. Participants with knee OA (clinical diagnosis of knee OA and KLG 1-3) had CT and 3 T MRI of the index knee. CaCs were assessed on CT using the Boston University Calcium Knee Score (BUCKS). The pain subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to assess knee pain and to estimate joint inflammation we used static and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. An independent sample t-test was used to test for a significant difference in KOOS-pain and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) models to test for differences in the static and DCE-MRI variables between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 158 participants with KOOS-pain available, 19 (12%) had CaC deposits, and of the 115 participants with MRI available, 13 (11.3%) had CaC deposits. We did not find a significant difference in mean KOOS-pain between the two groups; the mean difference was - 2.2 points (95%CI, - 10.86, 6.45). None of the MRI variables were associated with the presence of CaC deposits. Between-group differences were small for all MRI variables, with standardized mean differences ranging from small to medium (0.31-0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In individuals with knee OA, we did not find an association between intraarticular CaC deposits and an increase in knee joint inflammation or knee pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1939-1947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-025-04904-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore in a cross-sectional fashion if overweight individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and intraarticular calcium crystal (CaC) deposits experience more knee joint inflammation and knee pain compared with individuals without CaC deposits.

Subjects and methods: We used pre-randomization imaging data from an RCT, the LOSE-IT trial. Participants with knee OA (clinical diagnosis of knee OA and KLG 1-3) had CT and 3 T MRI of the index knee. CaCs were assessed on CT using the Boston University Calcium Knee Score (BUCKS). The pain subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to assess knee pain and to estimate joint inflammation we used static and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. An independent sample t-test was used to test for a significant difference in KOOS-pain and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) models to test for differences in the static and DCE-MRI variables between the two groups.

Results: Of the 158 participants with KOOS-pain available, 19 (12%) had CaC deposits, and of the 115 participants with MRI available, 13 (11.3%) had CaC deposits. We did not find a significant difference in mean KOOS-pain between the two groups; the mean difference was - 2.2 points (95%CI, - 10.86, 6.45). None of the MRI variables were associated with the presence of CaC deposits. Between-group differences were small for all MRI variables, with standardized mean differences ranging from small to medium (0.31-0.56).

Conclusion: In individuals with knee OA, we did not find an association between intraarticular CaC deposits and an increase in knee joint inflammation or knee pain.

关节钙晶体沉积与膝关节骨性关节炎、关节疼痛和炎症之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
目的:以横断面方式探讨患有膝关节骨关节炎(OA)和关节内钙晶体(CaC)沉积的超重个体是否比没有CaC沉积的个体经历更多的膝关节炎症和膝关节疼痛。受试者和方法:我们使用了一项随机对照试验(LOSE-IT试验)的预随机化成像数据。膝关节OA(临床诊断为膝关节OA和KLG 1-3)的参与者进行了膝关节的CT和3t MRI检查。使用波士顿大学钙膝关节评分(BUCKS)在CT上评估CaCs。膝关节损伤和骨关节炎预后评分(oos)的疼痛亚量表用于评估膝关节疼痛和评估关节炎症,我们使用静态和动态对比增强(DCE) MRI。采用独立样本t检验检验KOOS-pain的差异,采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)模型检验两组间静态和DCE-MRI变量的差异。结果:在158名患有koos疼痛的参与者中,19名(12%)有CaC沉积,在115名MRI可用的参与者中,13名(11.3%)有CaC沉积。我们没有发现两组患者的平均KOOS-pain有显著差异;平均差异为- 2.2点(95%CI, - 10.86, 6.45)。所有MRI变量均与CaC沉积的存在无关。所有MRI变量的组间差异较小,标准化平均差异从小到中(0.31-0.56)不等。结论:在膝关节OA患者中,我们没有发现关节内CaC沉积与膝关节炎症或膝关节疼痛增加之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信