Effectiveness of FIFA injury prevention programs in reducing ankle injuries among football players: a systematic review.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.18910
Mohammad Alhazmi, Emad Alhazmi, Wael Abdulghani Alghamdi, Mohammed Zalah, Shadab Uddin, Moattar Raza Rizvi, Fuzail Ahmad
{"title":"Effectiveness of FIFA injury prevention programs in reducing ankle injuries among football players: a systematic review.","authors":"Mohammad Alhazmi, Emad Alhazmi, Wael Abdulghani Alghamdi, Mohammed Zalah, Shadab Uddin, Moattar Raza Rizvi, Fuzail Ahmad","doi":"10.7717/peerj.18910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ankle injuries are some of the most common injuries among footballers and can prevent players from participating in sport. The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) developed FIFA injury prevention programs to reduce overall football injuries, but their effectiveness on a particular joint, such as the ankle, was not assessed. Therefore, this project aims to investigate if these FIFA injury prevention programs are particularly effective in reducing ankle injuries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was conducted with the following criteria for study selection: Randomized controlled trials (RTCs) comparing the FIFA programs (FIFA 11 the old version and FIFA 11+) with the usual training for the teams. Other studies that included the number or percentage of ankle injuries as an outcome. Sample: Male and female footballers aged between 13 and 40 years old and without any restriction on particular skill levels. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale (PEDro) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy identified five RCTs that used the FIFA programs. The included studies had a good-to-excellent methodological quality according to the PEDro scale (ranging from 5 to 7 out of 10). The pooled data from all the included studies indicated that the FIFA 11 and FIFA 11+ programs were effective in reducing the ankle injury rate by 14%, while pooled results from the studies that used the FIFA 11+ program significantly reduced ankle injury rate by 32%. However, the FIFA 11 program was not effective in reducing the ankle injury rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FIFA programs, and especially the FIFA 11+ program, appear to be more effective than the usual training in preventing ankle injuries among footballers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"13 ","pages":"e18910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18910","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ankle injuries are some of the most common injuries among footballers and can prevent players from participating in sport. The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) developed FIFA injury prevention programs to reduce overall football injuries, but their effectiveness on a particular joint, such as the ankle, was not assessed. Therefore, this project aims to investigate if these FIFA injury prevention programs are particularly effective in reducing ankle injuries.

Method: A systematic review was conducted with the following criteria for study selection: Randomized controlled trials (RTCs) comparing the FIFA programs (FIFA 11 the old version and FIFA 11+) with the usual training for the teams. Other studies that included the number or percentage of ankle injuries as an outcome. Sample: Male and female footballers aged between 13 and 40 years old and without any restriction on particular skill levels. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale (PEDro) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.

Results: The search strategy identified five RCTs that used the FIFA programs. The included studies had a good-to-excellent methodological quality according to the PEDro scale (ranging from 5 to 7 out of 10). The pooled data from all the included studies indicated that the FIFA 11 and FIFA 11+ programs were effective in reducing the ankle injury rate by 14%, while pooled results from the studies that used the FIFA 11+ program significantly reduced ankle injury rate by 32%. However, the FIFA 11 program was not effective in reducing the ankle injury rate.

Conclusion: The FIFA programs, and especially the FIFA 11+ program, appear to be more effective than the usual training in preventing ankle injuries among footballers.

背景:踝关节损伤是足球运动员最常见的损伤之一,可导致球员无法参加体育运动。国际足球联合会(FIFA)制定了 FIFA 伤害预防计划,以减少整体足球运动中的伤害,但这些计划对特定关节(如脚踝)的效果却未进行评估。因此,本项目旨在调查这些国际足联伤害预防计划是否对减少踝关节伤害特别有效:方法:根据以下研究选择标准进行了系统回顾:将 FIFA 项目(FIFA 11 旧版本和 FIFA 11+)与球队常规训练进行比较的随机对照试验(RTC)。其他将脚踝受伤的数量或百分比作为结果的研究。样本年龄在 13 岁至 40 岁之间的男女足球运动员,没有任何技术水平限制。物理治疗证据数据库量表(PEDro)用于评估纳入研究的方法质量:搜索策略确定了五项使用国际足联计划的研究。根据 PEDro 量表,纳入研究的方法学质量从良好到优秀不等(满分 10 分,从 5 分到 7 分不等)。所有纳入研究的汇总数据显示,FIFA 11 和 FIFA 11+ 计划能有效降低 14% 的踝关节受伤率,而使用 FIFA 11+ 计划的研究汇总结果则显著降低了 32% 的踝关节受伤率。然而,FIFA 11 项目在降低踝关节受伤率方面效果不佳:结论:在预防足球运动员脚踝受伤方面,FIFA 项目,尤其是 FIFA 11+ 项目,似乎比常规训练更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信