Quadratus lumborum block is feasible alternative to epidural block for postoperative analgesia after open radical cystectomy: surgical and oncological outcomes of a randomised clinical trial.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Erik Veskimäe, Andrus Korgvee, Heini Huhtala, Heikki Koskinen, Maija-Liisa Kalliomaki, Teuvo Tammela, Eija Junttila
{"title":"Quadratus lumborum block is feasible alternative to epidural block for postoperative analgesia after open radical cystectomy: surgical and oncological outcomes of a randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Erik Veskimäe, Andrus Korgvee, Heini Huhtala, Heikki Koskinen, Maija-Liisa Kalliomaki, Teuvo Tammela, Eija Junttila","doi":"10.2340/sju.v60.43105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current lack of standardised perioperative pain management protocols for open radical cystectomy (ORC) underscores the need for alternative approaches to the longstanding tradition of epidural block. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of bilateral single injection quadratum lumborum block (QLB) on patients' recovery and complication rates compared with epidural analgesia after ORC in a single-centre, randomised, parallel-group trial including adult patients with bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Consecutive ORC patients were randomly allocated into QLB and the epidural group. The primary endpoint of this study was related to opioid consumption, and the results have been published earlier. This report focuses on secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included a total of 41 patients, with 20 patients in the QLB group and 21 patients in the epidural group. Finally, 39 patients were included in the analysis.  There was a trend for more frequent need for postoperative norepinephrine and fluid support in the epidural group but without statistical significance. Postoperative complication rate was similar. Two patients in the epidural group compared to none in the QLB group were rehospitalised within 30 and 90 days. Mortality rate within 90 days was higher in the epidural group (4 vs. 0 patients, P = 0.064).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this trial, there were no significant differences in surgical and oncological outcomes after ORC when QLB is compared with epidural block for postoperative analgesia.  Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03328988.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":"60 ","pages":"59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v60.43105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The current lack of standardised perioperative pain management protocols for open radical cystectomy (ORC) underscores the need for alternative approaches to the longstanding tradition of epidural block. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of bilateral single injection quadratum lumborum block (QLB) on patients' recovery and complication rates compared with epidural analgesia after ORC in a single-centre, randomised, parallel-group trial including adult patients with bladder cancer.

Material and methods: Consecutive ORC patients were randomly allocated into QLB and the epidural group. The primary endpoint of this study was related to opioid consumption, and the results have been published earlier. This report focuses on secondary outcomes.

Results: This study included a total of 41 patients, with 20 patients in the QLB group and 21 patients in the epidural group. Finally, 39 patients were included in the analysis.  There was a trend for more frequent need for postoperative norepinephrine and fluid support in the epidural group but without statistical significance. Postoperative complication rate was similar. Two patients in the epidural group compared to none in the QLB group were rehospitalised within 30 and 90 days. Mortality rate within 90 days was higher in the epidural group (4 vs. 0 patients, P = 0.064).

Conclusions: In this trial, there were no significant differences in surgical and oncological outcomes after ORC when QLB is compared with epidural block for postoperative analgesia.  Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03328988.

腰方肌阻滞是开放式根治性膀胱切除术后硬膜外阻滞的可行替代方案:一项随机临床试验的外科和肿瘤学结果
目的:开放式根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)目前缺乏标准化的围手术期疼痛管理方案,这表明需要替代硬膜外阻滞的传统方法。本研究的目的是在一项包括膀胱癌成年患者的单中心、随机、平行组试验中,评估双侧单次注射腰方阻滞(QLB)对ORC后患者恢复和并发症发生率的影响,并与硬膜外镇痛进行比较。材料与方法:将连续ORC患者随机分为QLB组和硬膜外组。本研究的主要终点与阿片类药物消费有关,研究结果已在较早前发表。本报告侧重于次要结果。结果:本研究共纳入41例患者,QLB组20例,硬膜外组21例。最终,39例患者被纳入分析。硬膜外组术后更频繁地需要去甲肾上腺素和液体支持,但无统计学意义。术后并发症发生率相似。硬膜外组有2例患者在30天和90天内再次住院,而QLB组没有。硬膜外组90天内死亡率较高(4例vs. 0例,P = 0.064)。结论:在本试验中,与硬膜外阻滞相比,QLB在ORC术后的手术和肿瘤结果没有显著差异。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03328988。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信