Unpacking beauty norms and body image: Development and validation of the perceptions of beauty standards scale.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121251324085
Shishir Paudel, Anisha Chalise, Shaina Tamrakar, Dhurba Khatri
{"title":"Unpacking beauty norms and body image: Development and validation of the perceptions of beauty standards scale.","authors":"Shishir Paudel, Anisha Chalise, Shaina Tamrakar, Dhurba Khatri","doi":"10.1177/20503121251324085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Perceptions of beauty, deeply rooted in societal norms, significantly impact self-esteem, self-concept, and mental well-being. This study aimed to develop and validate the Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale, a tool designed to assess how individuals perceive societal beauty standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale was developed and validated following extensive literature review, expert consultation and survey among 313 adolescents in Kathmandu, Nepal. Items in the scale reflect societal standards of beauty, focusing on physical attributes such as weight, skin color, and body imperfections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Content validity was established with a scale-level content validity index of 0.95 and an item-level content validity index above 0.83 for all items. The initial 10-item Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale underwent exploratory factor analysis, which revealed two factors: \"Beauty Perceptions\" (38.67% variance explained) and \"Acceptance of Beauty Diversity\" (10.47% variance explained). However, two items exhibited instability in factor loadings and item-total correlations, prompting their removal from the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed for the Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale-10 two-factor model, the single-factor model, and the revised 8-item version (Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale-8). Confirmatory factor analysis results confirmed that the Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale-8 exhibited a good fit (CMIN/DF = 2.30, TLI = 0.947, SRMR = 0.040, RMSEA = 0.061), demonstrating strong construct validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scale showed good psychometric properties, including content validity, construct validity, and reliability. The Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale-8 offers a robust measure of societal beauty perceptions, providing valuable insights into body image and mental health, particularly in environments where societal beauty standards strongly influence self-esteem.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"13 ","pages":"20503121251324085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121251324085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Perceptions of beauty, deeply rooted in societal norms, significantly impact self-esteem, self-concept, and mental well-being. This study aimed to develop and validate the Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale, a tool designed to assess how individuals perceive societal beauty standards.

Methods: The Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale was developed and validated following extensive literature review, expert consultation and survey among 313 adolescents in Kathmandu, Nepal. Items in the scale reflect societal standards of beauty, focusing on physical attributes such as weight, skin color, and body imperfections.

Results: Content validity was established with a scale-level content validity index of 0.95 and an item-level content validity index above 0.83 for all items. The initial 10-item Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale underwent exploratory factor analysis, which revealed two factors: "Beauty Perceptions" (38.67% variance explained) and "Acceptance of Beauty Diversity" (10.47% variance explained). However, two items exhibited instability in factor loadings and item-total correlations, prompting their removal from the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed for the Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale-10 two-factor model, the single-factor model, and the revised 8-item version (Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale-8). Confirmatory factor analysis results confirmed that the Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale-8 exhibited a good fit (CMIN/DF = 2.30, TLI = 0.947, SRMR = 0.040, RMSEA = 0.061), demonstrating strong construct validity.

Conclusion: The scale showed good psychometric properties, including content validity, construct validity, and reliability. The Perceptions of Beauty Standards Scale-8 offers a robust measure of societal beauty perceptions, providing valuable insights into body image and mental health, particularly in environments where societal beauty standards strongly influence self-esteem.

解读美的标准和身体形象:美容标准认知量表的开发与验证。
目的:对美的认知,深深植根于社会规范,显著影响自尊、自我概念和心理健康。这项研究旨在开发和验证“审美标准量表”,这是一个评估个人如何看待社会审美标准的工具。方法:通过广泛的文献回顾、专家咨询和对尼泊尔加德满都313名青少年的调查,开发并验证了审美标准量表的感知。量表中的项目反映了社会对美的标准,关注的是身体特征,如体重、肤色和身体缺陷。结果:量表层面的内容效度指数为0.95,项目层面的内容效度指数均在0.83以上。对最初的10项美标准感知量表进行探索性因素分析,发现两个因素:“美感知”(解释方差为38.67%)和“接受美多样性”(解释方差为10.47%)。然而,两个项目在因子负荷和项目总量相关性方面表现出不稳定性,促使它们从量表中删除。对美标准知觉量表-10双因素模型、单因素模型和修订后的8项版本(美标准知觉量表-8)进行验证性因素分析。验证性因子分析结果证实,美标准知觉量表-8具有较好的拟合性(CMIN/DF = 2.30, TLI = 0.947, SRMR = 0.040, RMSEA = 0.061),具有较强的结构效度。结论:该量表在内容效度、结构效度和信度方面具有良好的心理测量特性。美标准认知量表-8提供了一个强有力的衡量社会美的认知,提供了对身体形象和心理健康的有价值的见解,特别是在社会美标准强烈影响自尊的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信