Ignacio Iborra, Ramon Bartoli, Ana Bargalló, Sergi Sunyé, Alba Ardèvol, Marta Fortuny, Sara Capdevila, Helena Masnou, Rosa M Morillas
{"title":"Impact of sex differences on the induction and evolution of clinical signs of an end-stage liver disease rat model.","authors":"Ignacio Iborra, Ramon Bartoli, Ana Bargalló, Sergi Sunyé, Alba Ardèvol, Marta Fortuny, Sara Capdevila, Helena Masnou, Rosa M Morillas","doi":"10.1177/00236772241309760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHistorically, preclinical studies with rat models have been carried out only with male animals. Current regulations require sex parity in experimental procedures. Several studies have shown significant sex differences in rat models of liver fibrosis, but there is no data available in end-stage liver disease. The aim was to describe sex-related differences in a carbon tetrachloride (CCl<sub>4</sub>)-induced rat model of cirrhosis with ascites.MethodsFifty-two rats, 26 of each sex, fed ad libitum with phenobarbital-enriched drinking water (5 mmol/l). CCl<sub>4</sub> was administered orally weekly, adjusting doses to weight changes after CCl<sub>4</sub> administration until ascites development.ResultsMedian time to ascites development was significantly higher in females (19 <i>vs</i>. 10 weeks). Males showed significantly greater weight changes 48 h after CCl<sub>4</sub> administration. The cumulative dose of CCl<sub>4</sub> was significantly higher in females, both at the time of diagnosis of ascites (10.7 <i>vs</i>. 1.5 ml) and at week 10 (median time to ascites development in males) (3.9 <i>vs</i>. 1.5 ml). There were no significant sex differences in model associated mortality (31% males <i>vs</i>. 27% females).ConclusionsSex differences have a significant impact on CCl<sub>4</sub>-induced end-stage liver disease; classical models should be redesigned to appropriately encompass both sexes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"236772241309760"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772241309760","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundHistorically, preclinical studies with rat models have been carried out only with male animals. Current regulations require sex parity in experimental procedures. Several studies have shown significant sex differences in rat models of liver fibrosis, but there is no data available in end-stage liver disease. The aim was to describe sex-related differences in a carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced rat model of cirrhosis with ascites.MethodsFifty-two rats, 26 of each sex, fed ad libitum with phenobarbital-enriched drinking water (5 mmol/l). CCl4 was administered orally weekly, adjusting doses to weight changes after CCl4 administration until ascites development.ResultsMedian time to ascites development was significantly higher in females (19 vs. 10 weeks). Males showed significantly greater weight changes 48 h after CCl4 administration. The cumulative dose of CCl4 was significantly higher in females, both at the time of diagnosis of ascites (10.7 vs. 1.5 ml) and at week 10 (median time to ascites development in males) (3.9 vs. 1.5 ml). There were no significant sex differences in model associated mortality (31% males vs. 27% females).ConclusionsSex differences have a significant impact on CCl4-induced end-stage liver disease; classical models should be redesigned to appropriately encompass both sexes.
期刊介绍:
The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.