Sex differences in progression of neurodegeneration: the AGES-Reykjavik Study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Emma L Twait, Vilmundur Gudnason, Lenore J Launer, Lotte Gerritsen, Mirjam I Geerlings
{"title":"Sex differences in progression of neurodegeneration: the AGES-Reykjavik Study.","authors":"Emma L Twait, Vilmundur Gudnason, Lenore J Launer, Lotte Gerritsen, Mirjam I Geerlings","doi":"10.1159/000545184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advancing age is associated with global brain atrophy. Cross-sectional studies have found sex differences in neuroanatomy; however, longitudinal studies assessing sex differences in neurodegeneration are currently scarce. The effects of age and sex on brain atrophy may not be uniform across the whole brain and may partially explain the sex differences observed in dementia. The current study aimed to examine sex differences in longitudinal atrophy patterns in gray and white matter regions in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study sample included 1480 individuals from the AGES-Reykjavik Study, a population-based cohort study, that underwent two MRI scans within an average of 5 years between assessments. Individuals were also followed-up for incident dementia diagnosis. Linear regression models were used to assess sex differences between mean differences in gray and white matter regions, correcting for age, education, baseline intracranial volume, baseline regional volumes, hypertension, body mass index, and APOE e4 allele status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men showed increased longitudinal atrophy in the total gray matter, as well as in the parietal cortex, cingulate cortex, caudate nucleus, brainstem, left cerebellum, precentral gyrus, putamen, globus pallidus, and orbitofrontal cortex. Whereas women exhibited greater atrophy over time in total white matter, but not in specific regions. No moderation was found between sex differences on incident dementia regarding atrophy patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While men show larger gray matter volumes cross-sectionally, their rates of atrophy over time are steeper compared to women. Sex differences in brain atrophy seem to be specifically detrimental in men in regions related to executive functioning, motor control, and emotion processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19115,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Advancing age is associated with global brain atrophy. Cross-sectional studies have found sex differences in neuroanatomy; however, longitudinal studies assessing sex differences in neurodegeneration are currently scarce. The effects of age and sex on brain atrophy may not be uniform across the whole brain and may partially explain the sex differences observed in dementia. The current study aimed to examine sex differences in longitudinal atrophy patterns in gray and white matter regions in older adults.

Methods: The study sample included 1480 individuals from the AGES-Reykjavik Study, a population-based cohort study, that underwent two MRI scans within an average of 5 years between assessments. Individuals were also followed-up for incident dementia diagnosis. Linear regression models were used to assess sex differences between mean differences in gray and white matter regions, correcting for age, education, baseline intracranial volume, baseline regional volumes, hypertension, body mass index, and APOE e4 allele status.

Results: Men showed increased longitudinal atrophy in the total gray matter, as well as in the parietal cortex, cingulate cortex, caudate nucleus, brainstem, left cerebellum, precentral gyrus, putamen, globus pallidus, and orbitofrontal cortex. Whereas women exhibited greater atrophy over time in total white matter, but not in specific regions. No moderation was found between sex differences on incident dementia regarding atrophy patterns.

Conclusions: While men show larger gray matter volumes cross-sectionally, their rates of atrophy over time are steeper compared to women. Sex differences in brain atrophy seem to be specifically detrimental in men in regions related to executive functioning, motor control, and emotion processing.

神经变性进展的性别差异:AGES-Reykjavik研究。
导读:年龄增长与全脑萎缩有关。横断面研究发现了神经解剖学上的性别差异;然而,评估神经变性的性别差异的纵向研究目前很少。年龄和性别对脑萎缩的影响在整个大脑中可能并不一致,这可能部分解释了在痴呆症中观察到的性别差异。目前的研究旨在检查老年人灰质和白质区域纵向萎缩模式的性别差异。方法:研究样本包括来自AGES-Reykjavik研究的1480名个体,这是一项基于人群的队列研究,在评估之间平均5年内进行了两次MRI扫描。研究人员还对个体进行了痴呆诊断随访。使用线性回归模型评估灰质和白质区域平均差异的性别差异,校正年龄、教育程度、基线颅内容积、基线区域容积、高血压、体重指数和APOE e4等位基因状态。结果:男性总体灰质纵向萎缩增加,顶叶皮层、扣带皮层、尾状核、脑干、左小脑、中央前回、壳核、苍白球和眶额皮质也出现萎缩。而随着时间的推移,女性在整个白质中表现出更大的萎缩,但在特定区域没有。在痴呆的萎缩模式方面,没有发现性别差异之间的缓和。结论:虽然男性在横切面上显示出更大的灰质体积,但随着时间的推移,他们的萎缩速度比女性更陡峭。脑萎缩的性别差异似乎在与执行功能、运动控制和情绪处理相关的区域对男性尤其有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Neurodegenerative Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Neurodegenerative Diseases'' is a bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal for the publication of advances in the understanding of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer''s disease, Parkinson''s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington''s disease and related neurological and psychiatric disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信