Capacity to form common mycorrhizal networks reduces the positive impact of clonal integration between plants.

IF 5.4 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Yuanhao Zhang, Mark A Anthony, Qianfeng Yuan, Yi Wang, Panpan Zhao, Enjian Chen, Shaolin Peng
{"title":"Capacity to form common mycorrhizal networks reduces the positive impact of clonal integration between plants.","authors":"Yuanhao Zhang, Mark A Anthony, Qianfeng Yuan, Yi Wang, Panpan Zhao, Enjian Chen, Shaolin Peng","doi":"10.1111/ppl.70149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both clonal plant capabilities for physiological integration and common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) formed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can influence the distribution of nutrients and growth among interconnected individuals. Using a microcosm model system, we aimed to disentangle how CMNs interact with clonal integration to influence plant growth and development. We grew Sphagneticola trilobata clones with isolated root systems in individual, adjacent containers while preventing, disrupting, or allowing clonal integration aboveground via spacers and belowground CMNs to form. We assessed multiple metrics of plant development (e.g., growth, specific leaf area, soluble sugar content), <sup>15</sup>N transfer from donor (mother) to receiver (daughter) plants, and variation in AMF communities. We show that spacer formation between ramets and the capacity to form CMNs promoted and inhibited the growth of smaller daughter plants, respectively. In contrast to the independent effects of CMNs and spacers, CMNs, in combination with spacers, significantly weakened the promotion of daughter plants by clonal integration. AMF species richness was also negatively correlated with overall plant growth. Our results demonstrate that two common modes of plant interconnection interact in non-additive ways to affect clonal plant integration and growth. These findings, based on Sphagneticola trilobata, question the underlying assumptions of the positive effects of both AMF CMNs and species richness in comparison to direct plant interconnections.</p>","PeriodicalId":20164,"journal":{"name":"Physiologia plantarum","volume":"177 2","pages":"e70149"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiologia plantarum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both clonal plant capabilities for physiological integration and common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) formed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can influence the distribution of nutrients and growth among interconnected individuals. Using a microcosm model system, we aimed to disentangle how CMNs interact with clonal integration to influence plant growth and development. We grew Sphagneticola trilobata clones with isolated root systems in individual, adjacent containers while preventing, disrupting, or allowing clonal integration aboveground via spacers and belowground CMNs to form. We assessed multiple metrics of plant development (e.g., growth, specific leaf area, soluble sugar content), 15N transfer from donor (mother) to receiver (daughter) plants, and variation in AMF communities. We show that spacer formation between ramets and the capacity to form CMNs promoted and inhibited the growth of smaller daughter plants, respectively. In contrast to the independent effects of CMNs and spacers, CMNs, in combination with spacers, significantly weakened the promotion of daughter plants by clonal integration. AMF species richness was also negatively correlated with overall plant growth. Our results demonstrate that two common modes of plant interconnection interact in non-additive ways to affect clonal plant integration and growth. These findings, based on Sphagneticola trilobata, question the underlying assumptions of the positive effects of both AMF CMNs and species richness in comparison to direct plant interconnections.

形成共同菌根网络的能力降低了植物间无性系整合的积极影响。
植物的克隆生理整合能力和丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)形成的共同菌根网络(CMN)都能影响相互连接的个体之间的养分分配和生长。我们利用一个微观世界模型系统,旨在弄清CMN如何与克隆整合相互作用,从而影响植物的生长和发育。我们在相邻的独立容器中培育了具有孤立根系的 Sphagneticola trilobata 克隆,同时阻止、破坏或允许通过间隔物和地下 CMN 形成地上克隆整合。我们评估了植物发育的多个指标(如生长、特定叶面积、可溶性糖含量)、供体(母本)向受体(子本)植物的 15N 转移以及 AMF 群落的变化。我们的研究表明,柱头之间形成的间隔和形成 CMN 的能力分别促进和抑制了较小子植株的生长。与CMNs和间隔物的独立作用不同,CMNs与间隔物结合会显著削弱克隆整合对子植株的促进作用。AMF物种丰富度与植物的整体生长也呈负相关。我们的研究结果表明,两种常见的植物互联模式以非加成的方式相互作用,影响克隆植物的整合和生长。这些基于三叶鞘氨醇的研究结果质疑了 AMF CMN 和物种丰富度与直接植物互联相比具有积极影响的基本假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiologia plantarum
Physiologia plantarum 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: Physiologia Plantarum is an international journal committed to publishing the best full-length original research papers that advance our understanding of primary mechanisms of plant development, growth and productivity as well as plant interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment. All organisational levels of experimental plant biology – from molecular and cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics to ecophysiology and global change biology – fall within the scope of the journal. The content is distributed between 5 main subject areas supervised by Subject Editors specialised in the respective domain: (1) biochemistry and metabolism, (2) ecophysiology, stress and adaptation, (3) uptake, transport and assimilation, (4) development, growth and differentiation, (5) photobiology and photosynthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信