Winifred Ekezie, Shabana Cassambai, Ffion Curtis, Barbara Czyznikowska, Lauren L O'Mahoney, Andrew Willis, Shavez Jeffers, Ruksar Abdala, Ayesha Butt, Yogini Chudasama, Kamlesh Khunti, Azhar Farooqi
{"title":"Global Insights on the Involvement of Ethnic Minority Populations in Health and Social Care Research Priority Setting: A Systematic Scoping Review.","authors":"Winifred Ekezie, Shabana Cassambai, Ffion Curtis, Barbara Czyznikowska, Lauren L O'Mahoney, Andrew Willis, Shavez Jeffers, Ruksar Abdala, Ayesha Butt, Yogini Chudasama, Kamlesh Khunti, Azhar Farooqi","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02377-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Representing all population groups in health and social care research is essential for generating research relevant to decision making in everyday clinical and social healthcare policy and practice. Conducting research that is relevant to all, starts with ensuring equitable representation in research priority selection. This scoping review aimed to identify evidence of published and good practices in health and social care research priority-setting activities, which included people from ethnic minority backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline. Studies that reported including ethnic minority community members in health and social care research priority setting from 2010 were considered. The research priority processes were evaluated using a checklist of good practices in research priority settings.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Forty-seven articles representing 12 countries and various health topics were included. Group discussion was the most common approach for conducting the research priority setting activities. No study addressed all 20 recommended research priority-setting good practice principles. Most studies provided sufficient information about the context of the priority-setting exercise. Examples of good practices included community advisory boards, local approaches to health research, and multi-disciplinary steering groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Representation of ethnic minority populations' involvement in research across different countries and broader health and social care areas is limited. Recommendations to address these challenges are presented and could help inform researchers, funders, and policymakers to understand what health and social care research topics are prioritised by ethnic minority communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02377-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Representing all population groups in health and social care research is essential for generating research relevant to decision making in everyday clinical and social healthcare policy and practice. Conducting research that is relevant to all, starts with ensuring equitable representation in research priority selection. This scoping review aimed to identify evidence of published and good practices in health and social care research priority-setting activities, which included people from ethnic minority backgrounds.
Methods: The search was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline. Studies that reported including ethnic minority community members in health and social care research priority setting from 2010 were considered. The research priority processes were evaluated using a checklist of good practices in research priority settings.
Findings: Forty-seven articles representing 12 countries and various health topics were included. Group discussion was the most common approach for conducting the research priority setting activities. No study addressed all 20 recommended research priority-setting good practice principles. Most studies provided sufficient information about the context of the priority-setting exercise. Examples of good practices included community advisory boards, local approaches to health research, and multi-disciplinary steering groups.
Conclusion: Representation of ethnic minority populations' involvement in research across different countries and broader health and social care areas is limited. Recommendations to address these challenges are presented and could help inform researchers, funders, and policymakers to understand what health and social care research topics are prioritised by ethnic minority communities.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.