Geospatial Analysis of Tooth Loss Among the US Geriatric Population by Zip Code: The Role of Socioeconomic and Racial Factors.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ravindra Rapaka, Richa Kaushik
{"title":"Geospatial Analysis of Tooth Loss Among the US Geriatric Population by Zip Code: The Role of Socioeconomic and Racial Factors.","authors":"Ravindra Rapaka, Richa Kaushik","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02378-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the prevalence of tooth loss among the US geriatric population (≥ 65 years) in relation to socioeconomic and demographic characteristics at the local level, specifically identified by ZIP code tabulation areas (ZCTAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data obtained from the American Community Survey (ACS) and PLACES in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were evaluated. Geographical autocorrelation was examined using Moran's I, while geographically weighted regression (GWR) and geographical lag models were employed to analyze spatial patterns and relationships, accounting for spatial dependence. K-means clustering established several ZCTA typologies based on socioeconomic variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A notable spatial autocorrelation was seen in the rates of total tooth loss (Moran's I = 0.64, p < 0.001). GWR demonstrated superior accuracy when compared with ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, accounting for 81.1% of the variance and indicating significant spatial heterogeneities in the associations between tooth loss and variables such as education, income, and poverty. Spatial lag models corroborated the impact of adjacent ZCTAs on the prevalence of tooth loss. Ethnic and racial discrepancies suggested that Black majority ZCTAs exhibited greater incidences of severe tooth loss. K-means clustering discovered distinct ZCTA typologies, one of which is a high-risk group marked by extreme poverty and lack of education, resulting in a higher rate of tooth loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings emphasize the critical role of geographic context in understanding disparities in oral health care and underscore the necessity for localized primary preventive strategies targeted to the elderly, particularly those living in economically disadvantaged regions, to attain oral equality.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02378-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the prevalence of tooth loss among the US geriatric population (≥ 65 years) in relation to socioeconomic and demographic characteristics at the local level, specifically identified by ZIP code tabulation areas (ZCTAs).

Methods: Data obtained from the American Community Survey (ACS) and PLACES in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were evaluated. Geographical autocorrelation was examined using Moran's I, while geographically weighted regression (GWR) and geographical lag models were employed to analyze spatial patterns and relationships, accounting for spatial dependence. K-means clustering established several ZCTA typologies based on socioeconomic variables.

Results: A notable spatial autocorrelation was seen in the rates of total tooth loss (Moran's I = 0.64, p < 0.001). GWR demonstrated superior accuracy when compared with ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, accounting for 81.1% of the variance and indicating significant spatial heterogeneities in the associations between tooth loss and variables such as education, income, and poverty. Spatial lag models corroborated the impact of adjacent ZCTAs on the prevalence of tooth loss. Ethnic and racial discrepancies suggested that Black majority ZCTAs exhibited greater incidences of severe tooth loss. K-means clustering discovered distinct ZCTA typologies, one of which is a high-risk group marked by extreme poverty and lack of education, resulting in a higher rate of tooth loss.

Conclusion: The findings emphasize the critical role of geographic context in understanding disparities in oral health care and underscore the necessity for localized primary preventive strategies targeted to the elderly, particularly those living in economically disadvantaged regions, to attain oral equality.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信