Applicability of colon capsule endoscopy for monitoring ulcerative colitis: a systematic review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mathilde Simone Rasmussen, Lea Østergaard Hansen, Ulrik Deding, Mark Bremholm Ellebæk, Jens Kjeldsen, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer
{"title":"Applicability of colon capsule endoscopy for monitoring ulcerative colitis: a systematic review.","authors":"Mathilde Simone Rasmussen, Lea Østergaard Hansen, Ulrik Deding, Mark Bremholm Ellebæk, Jens Kjeldsen, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2025.2475081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the target of therapy in Ulcerative colitis (UC) has changed from symptomatic relief to mucosal healing, endoscopic visualization is mandatory. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) may serve as a less invasive and more tolerable alternative to standard colonoscopy (SC) for the monitoring of UC.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, adverse events and tolerability for CCE compared to SC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search results were imported into Covidence and screened. Included studies underwent risk of bias assessment using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS), and relevant data, including completeness of the procedure, type of bowel preparation and adverse events, was extracted. Pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy were calculated from the studies providing the necessary data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2804 articles, six studies were eligible for inclusion. Three provided the necessary data to calculate pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy in recognizing mucosal inflammation: pooled sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 68.8%, positive predictive value of 89.4%, and negative predictive value of 78.6%. The adverse events, such as nausea and abdominal distension, were predominantly related to bowel preparation regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCE has the potential for monitoring UC. However, the specificity and NPV must be improved. Bowel preparation regimens must be optimized to improve patient experience and the effectiveness of CCE.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Prospero ID CRD42023450210.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"336-342"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2475081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the target of therapy in Ulcerative colitis (UC) has changed from symptomatic relief to mucosal healing, endoscopic visualization is mandatory. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) may serve as a less invasive and more tolerable alternative to standard colonoscopy (SC) for the monitoring of UC.

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, adverse events and tolerability for CCE compared to SC.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science.

Methods: Search results were imported into Covidence and screened. Included studies underwent risk of bias assessment using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS), and relevant data, including completeness of the procedure, type of bowel preparation and adverse events, was extracted. Pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy were calculated from the studies providing the necessary data.

Results: Out of 2804 articles, six studies were eligible for inclusion. Three provided the necessary data to calculate pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy in recognizing mucosal inflammation: pooled sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 68.8%, positive predictive value of 89.4%, and negative predictive value of 78.6%. The adverse events, such as nausea and abdominal distension, were predominantly related to bowel preparation regimens.

Conclusion: CCE has the potential for monitoring UC. However, the specificity and NPV must be improved. Bowel preparation regimens must be optimized to improve patient experience and the effectiveness of CCE.

Registration: Prospero ID CRD42023450210.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信