Assessing the diagnostic utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in evaluating coronary artery disease.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1177/03000605251325170
Jianhua Xie, Yuan Liang, Xiaobo Huang, Yuxue Qin, Hai Huang, Jianxiong Liu
{"title":"Assessing the diagnostic utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in evaluating coronary artery disease.","authors":"Jianhua Xie, Yuan Liang, Xiaobo Huang, Yuxue Qin, Hai Huang, Jianxiong Liu","doi":"10.1177/03000605251325170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis retrospective study aimed to investigate the correlation between the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and the severity of coronary stenosis (SYNTAX score) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD), thereby assessing CPET's diagnostic value.MethodsWe classified 220 patients who underwent coronary angiography into coronary heart disease (CHD) and non-CHD groups based on stenosis severity. Patients with SCAD were categorized into mild, moderate, and severe groups by the SYNTAX score. CPET was performed, and data on the general information, serological indicators, and echocardiographic parameters were collected. CPET parameters included oxygen uptake related to the work rate (△VO<sub>2</sub>/△WR), peak metabolic equivalent (Peak Mets), anaerobic threshold (AT), peak oxygen consumption per kilogram (PVO<sub>2</sub>/kg), and metabolic equivalent at anaerobic threshold (Met@AT).ResultsPatients without SCAD demonstrated significantly higher CPET parameters than those with SCAD. The CPET parameters varied significantly across severity groups in the SCAD group, with the mild group exhibiting higher values than the moderate and severe groups. No significant differences were observed in the baseline data between the groups or among patients with varying numbers of lesion branches.ConclusionCPET parameters demonstrated a significant negative correlation with the SYNTAX score in patients with SCAD, indicating its potential clinical value in assessing the severity of coronary stenosis and diagnosing SCAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 3","pages":"3000605251325170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251325170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis retrospective study aimed to investigate the correlation between the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and the severity of coronary stenosis (SYNTAX score) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD), thereby assessing CPET's diagnostic value.MethodsWe classified 220 patients who underwent coronary angiography into coronary heart disease (CHD) and non-CHD groups based on stenosis severity. Patients with SCAD were categorized into mild, moderate, and severe groups by the SYNTAX score. CPET was performed, and data on the general information, serological indicators, and echocardiographic parameters were collected. CPET parameters included oxygen uptake related to the work rate (△VO2/△WR), peak metabolic equivalent (Peak Mets), anaerobic threshold (AT), peak oxygen consumption per kilogram (PVO2/kg), and metabolic equivalent at anaerobic threshold (Met@AT).ResultsPatients without SCAD demonstrated significantly higher CPET parameters than those with SCAD. The CPET parameters varied significantly across severity groups in the SCAD group, with the mild group exhibiting higher values than the moderate and severe groups. No significant differences were observed in the baseline data between the groups or among patients with varying numbers of lesion branches.ConclusionCPET parameters demonstrated a significant negative correlation with the SYNTAX score in patients with SCAD, indicating its potential clinical value in assessing the severity of coronary stenosis and diagnosing SCAD.

评估心肺运动试验在评估冠状动脉疾病中的诊断价值。
目的回顾性研究心肺运动试验(CPET)与稳定型冠心病(SCAD)患者冠脉狭窄严重程度(SYNTAX评分)的相关性,评价CPET的诊断价值。方法根据狭窄程度将220例行冠状动脉造影的患者分为冠心病组和非冠心病组。根据SYNTAX评分将SCAD患者分为轻度、中度和重度组。行CPET检查,收集一般信息、血清学指标和超声心动图参数。CPET参数包括与工作速率相关的摄氧量(△VO2/△WR)、峰值代谢当量(peak Mets)、无氧阈值(AT)、每千克峰值耗氧量(PVO2/kg)和无氧阈值代谢当量(Met@AT)。结果无SCAD患者的CPET参数明显高于SCAD患者。SCAD组CPET参数在不同严重程度组间差异显著,轻度组高于中度和重度组。基线数据在两组之间或不同数量病变分支的患者之间没有观察到显著差异。结论cpet参数与SCAD患者SYNTAX评分呈显著负相关,提示cpet参数在评估冠状动脉狭窄严重程度和诊断SCAD方面具有潜在的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信