Associations between kidney function with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a prospective cohort study in China.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jialiu He, Ya'nan Wan, Xikang Fan, Hao Yu, Yu Qin, Jian Su, Yan Lu, Enchun Pan, Dong Hang, Chong Shen, Jinyi Zhou, Ming Wu
{"title":"Associations between kidney function with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a prospective cohort study in China.","authors":"Jialiu He, Ya'nan Wan, Xikang Fan, Hao Yu, Yu Qin, Jian Su, Yan Lu, Enchun Pan, Dong Hang, Chong Shen, Jinyi Zhou, Ming Wu","doi":"10.1186/s41043-025-00809-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abnormal kidney function is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the evidence between kidney function and mortality among Chinese patients with T2DM were still limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study included 19,919 participants with baseline T2DM from 2013 to 2014 in Jiangsu, China. Serum estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urea, and uric acid were measured at baseline, and Cox regression models were used to evaluate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidential intervals (95%CIs) of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Restricted cubic splines were used to analyze dose-response relationships, and we explored the best cut-off values by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 9.77 years, 4,428 deaths occurred, including 1,542 (34.8%) due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), and 1,074 (24.3%) due to cancer. Compared to lowest quintile level (Q1), the highest quintile (Q5) of eGFR was negatively associated with all-cause (HR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.58-0.77) and CVD mortality (HR = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.44-0.75). The higher levels of urea and uric acid were positively associated with all-cause mortality (Q5 vs. Q1: HR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.16-1.39; HR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.10-1.34), with an overall \"U-shaped\" dose-response relationships. Moreover, higher urea was negatively associated with cancer mortality (Q5 vs. Q1: HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.66-0.95). The best cut-off values with all-cause mortality were 88.50 ml/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>, 6.95 mmol/L and 342.50 µmol/L for eGFR, urea, and uric acid, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found abnormal kidney function was associated with mortality among people with T2DM. More clinical researches are needed to validate the effects and cut-off values of kidney function on mortality risk for T2DM prevention and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":"44 1","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-00809-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Abnormal kidney function is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the evidence between kidney function and mortality among Chinese patients with T2DM were still limited.

Methods: This cohort study included 19,919 participants with baseline T2DM from 2013 to 2014 in Jiangsu, China. Serum estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urea, and uric acid were measured at baseline, and Cox regression models were used to evaluate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidential intervals (95%CIs) of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Restricted cubic splines were used to analyze dose-response relationships, and we explored the best cut-off values by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: During a median follow-up of 9.77 years, 4,428 deaths occurred, including 1,542 (34.8%) due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), and 1,074 (24.3%) due to cancer. Compared to lowest quintile level (Q1), the highest quintile (Q5) of eGFR was negatively associated with all-cause (HR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.58-0.77) and CVD mortality (HR = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.44-0.75). The higher levels of urea and uric acid were positively associated with all-cause mortality (Q5 vs. Q1: HR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.16-1.39; HR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.10-1.34), with an overall "U-shaped" dose-response relationships. Moreover, higher urea was negatively associated with cancer mortality (Q5 vs. Q1: HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.66-0.95). The best cut-off values with all-cause mortality were 88.50 ml/min/1.73m2, 6.95 mmol/L and 342.50 µmol/L for eGFR, urea, and uric acid, respectively.

Conclusion: We found abnormal kidney function was associated with mortality among people with T2DM. More clinical researches are needed to validate the effects and cut-off values of kidney function on mortality risk for T2DM prevention and management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信