Determination Of Burn Size In Mouse Models Of Burn Injury: A Scoping Review Of Studies Leveraging Scald And Contact Burns.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Meagan S Kingren, Mary Barre, Abby Barlow, Jaycelyn S Hall, Ansley Varisco, Craig Porter
{"title":"Determination Of Burn Size In Mouse Models Of Burn Injury: A Scoping Review Of Studies Leveraging Scald And Contact Burns.","authors":"Meagan S Kingren, Mary Barre, Abby Barlow, Jaycelyn S Hall, Ansley Varisco, Craig Porter","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burns are a leading cause of non-fatal injury worldwide and leave survivors with significant complications, including prolonged hypermetabolism. Rodent models are commonly used to better understand the molecular underpinnings of burn injury. However, there is a lack of congruency in methodological reporting standards, particularly with regard to the reporting of burn size. We undertook a scoping review to identify gaps in the methodological reporting in mouse burn model literature. Full-text English peer-reviewed articles were included if they utilized a scald or contact burn to the dorsal and/or ventral sides of mice. Of the 7,073 queried articles, 1,057 met our inclusion criteria. Basic animal characteristics such as mouse sex, strain, age, and body mass were excluded in several papers, where only ~34% of included papers reported all four details. Roughly half of the papers reviewed did not report absolute burn size (~53%) or the measured/calculated total body surface area (TBSA) of mice, typically reporting relative burn size as a percentage of TBSA only. Further, the use of different k-constants in TBSA calculations created significant variation, thereby leading to ~20% differences in relative burn sizes in similarly sized/aged mice. Regardless of whether mice were randomized to experimental groups, the method of randomization and key husbandry variables were infrequently reported. In order to promote rigor, reproducibility, and translatability, preclinical models of burn injury studies should adhere to the essential 10 of the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines, and also report absolute burn sizes and the TBSA of mice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burns are a leading cause of non-fatal injury worldwide and leave survivors with significant complications, including prolonged hypermetabolism. Rodent models are commonly used to better understand the molecular underpinnings of burn injury. However, there is a lack of congruency in methodological reporting standards, particularly with regard to the reporting of burn size. We undertook a scoping review to identify gaps in the methodological reporting in mouse burn model literature. Full-text English peer-reviewed articles were included if they utilized a scald or contact burn to the dorsal and/or ventral sides of mice. Of the 7,073 queried articles, 1,057 met our inclusion criteria. Basic animal characteristics such as mouse sex, strain, age, and body mass were excluded in several papers, where only ~34% of included papers reported all four details. Roughly half of the papers reviewed did not report absolute burn size (~53%) or the measured/calculated total body surface area (TBSA) of mice, typically reporting relative burn size as a percentage of TBSA only. Further, the use of different k-constants in TBSA calculations created significant variation, thereby leading to ~20% differences in relative burn sizes in similarly sized/aged mice. Regardless of whether mice were randomized to experimental groups, the method of randomization and key husbandry variables were infrequently reported. In order to promote rigor, reproducibility, and translatability, preclinical models of burn injury studies should adhere to the essential 10 of the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines, and also report absolute burn sizes and the TBSA of mice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信