Determination Of Burn Size In Mouse Models Of Burn Injury: A Scoping Review Of Studies Leveraging Scald And Contact Burns.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Meagan S Kingren, Mary Barre, Abby Barlow, Jaycelyn S Hall, Ansley Varisco, Craig Porter
{"title":"Determination Of Burn Size In Mouse Models Of Burn Injury: A Scoping Review Of Studies Leveraging Scald And Contact Burns.","authors":"Meagan S Kingren, Mary Barre, Abby Barlow, Jaycelyn S Hall, Ansley Varisco, Craig Porter","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burns are a leading cause of non-fatal injury worldwide and leave survivors with significant complications, including prolonged hypermetabolism. Rodent models are commonly used to better understand the molecular underpinnings of burn injury. However, there is a lack of congruency in methodological reporting standards, particularly with regard to the reporting of burn size. We undertook a scoping review to identify gaps in the methodological reporting in mouse burn model literature. Full-text English peer-reviewed articles were included if they utilized a scald or contact burn to the dorsal and/or ventral sides of mice. Of the 7,073 queried articles, 1,057 met our inclusion criteria. Basic animal characteristics such as mouse sex, strain, age, and body mass were excluded in several papers, where only ~34% of included papers reported all four details. Roughly half of the papers reviewed did not report absolute burn size (~53%) or the measured/calculated total body surface area (TBSA) of mice, typically reporting relative burn size as a percentage of TBSA only. Further, the use of different k-constants in TBSA calculations created significant variation, thereby leading to ~20% differences in relative burn sizes in similarly sized/aged mice. Regardless of whether mice were randomized to experimental groups, the method of randomization and key husbandry variables were infrequently reported. In order to promote rigor, reproducibility, and translatability, preclinical models of burn injury studies should adhere to the essential 10 of the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines, and also report absolute burn sizes and the TBSA of mice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burns are a leading cause of non-fatal injury worldwide and leave survivors with significant complications, including prolonged hypermetabolism. Rodent models are commonly used to better understand the molecular underpinnings of burn injury. However, there is a lack of congruency in methodological reporting standards, particularly with regard to the reporting of burn size. We undertook a scoping review to identify gaps in the methodological reporting in mouse burn model literature. Full-text English peer-reviewed articles were included if they utilized a scald or contact burn to the dorsal and/or ventral sides of mice. Of the 7,073 queried articles, 1,057 met our inclusion criteria. Basic animal characteristics such as mouse sex, strain, age, and body mass were excluded in several papers, where only ~34% of included papers reported all four details. Roughly half of the papers reviewed did not report absolute burn size (~53%) or the measured/calculated total body surface area (TBSA) of mice, typically reporting relative burn size as a percentage of TBSA only. Further, the use of different k-constants in TBSA calculations created significant variation, thereby leading to ~20% differences in relative burn sizes in similarly sized/aged mice. Regardless of whether mice were randomized to experimental groups, the method of randomization and key husbandry variables were infrequently reported. In order to promote rigor, reproducibility, and translatability, preclinical models of burn injury studies should adhere to the essential 10 of the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines, and also report absolute burn sizes and the TBSA of mice.

烧伤小鼠模型中烧伤大小的测定:对烫伤和接触性烧伤研究的范围综述。
烧伤是世界范围内非致命伤害的主要原因,并给幸存者留下严重的并发症,包括长期的高代谢。啮齿动物模型通常用于更好地了解烧伤的分子基础。然而,方法报告标准缺乏一致性,特别是关于烧伤大小的报告。我们进行了一项范围审查,以确定小鼠烧伤模型文献中方法学报告的空白。全文英文同行评议的文章,如果他们使用烫伤或接触烧伤的背部和/或腹部的小鼠。在7073篇查询的文章中,1057篇符合我们的纳入标准。一些论文排除了基本的动物特征,如小鼠性别、品系、年龄和体重,其中只有约34%的论文报告了所有四个细节。大约有一半的论文没有报告绝对烧伤面积(约53%)或测量/计算的小鼠体表面积(TBSA),通常只报告相对烧伤面积占TBSA的百分比。此外,在TBSA计算中使用不同的k常数产生了显著的差异,从而导致相同大小/年龄的小鼠的相对烧伤大小差异约20%。无论小鼠是否被随机分配到实验组,随机化方法和关键饲养变量的报道都很少。为了提高严谨性、可重复性和可翻译性,烧伤研究的临床前模型应遵守ARRIVE(动物研究:报告体内实验)指南的基本10条,并报告小鼠的绝对烧伤大小和TBSA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信