Attitudes of medical students towards communication skills and patient-centered care: the impact of group mentorship.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Elise Pauline Skjevik, Tor Anvik, Unni Ringberg, Eirik H Ofstad
{"title":"Attitudes of medical students towards communication skills and patient-centered care: the impact of group mentorship.","authors":"Elise Pauline Skjevik, Tor Anvik, Unni Ringberg, Eirik H Ofstad","doi":"10.5116/ijme.679e.091b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore medical students' self-assessed preparedness for clinical practice and attitudes towards learning communication skills, and attitudes towards patient-centeredness before and after introducing a new curriculum with a group mentorship program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional questionnaire-study (1-5 Likert scale) was conducted among the first class of medical students following the new curriculum (NC, n = 51) in their fifth year and the final class of students in the old curriculum (OC, n = 48) in their sixth year. The questionnaire contained questions regarding program evaluation, and statements that measured the students' attitudes towards learning communication skills and patient-centeredness. Descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U-test were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NC-students (Mdn=4) scored significantly higher than the OC-students (Mdn=3), when asked how they thought the first four years of the medical curriculum had prepared them for clinical practice (U=828.5, p=.003, r=0.35). Similarly, NC-students felt more prepared for communication with patients (Mdn=4 for both groups, U=748.5, p<.001, r=0.35) and ethical reflections (Mdn=4 for both groups, U=951.5, p=0.043, r=0.20). NC-students reported significantly more positive attitudes towards learning communication skills than did OC-students. They had higher mean scores on all items regarding patient-centeredness, although these differences were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A group-based mentorship program within the new curriculum significantly enhanced medical students' self-assessed clinical preparedness and positively shifted their attitudes towards communication skills and patient-centeredness. More research is needed to compare medical schools with and without longitudinal group mentorship programs to assess students' professional attitudes, and ideally, their performance in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"16 ","pages":"52-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.679e.091b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore medical students' self-assessed preparedness for clinical practice and attitudes towards learning communication skills, and attitudes towards patient-centeredness before and after introducing a new curriculum with a group mentorship program.

Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-study (1-5 Likert scale) was conducted among the first class of medical students following the new curriculum (NC, n = 51) in their fifth year and the final class of students in the old curriculum (OC, n = 48) in their sixth year. The questionnaire contained questions regarding program evaluation, and statements that measured the students' attitudes towards learning communication skills and patient-centeredness. Descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U-test were used.

Results: NC-students (Mdn=4) scored significantly higher than the OC-students (Mdn=3), when asked how they thought the first four years of the medical curriculum had prepared them for clinical practice (U=828.5, p=.003, r=0.35). Similarly, NC-students felt more prepared for communication with patients (Mdn=4 for both groups, U=748.5, p<.001, r=0.35) and ethical reflections (Mdn=4 for both groups, U=951.5, p=0.043, r=0.20). NC-students reported significantly more positive attitudes towards learning communication skills than did OC-students. They had higher mean scores on all items regarding patient-centeredness, although these differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: A group-based mentorship program within the new curriculum significantly enhanced medical students' self-assessed clinical preparedness and positively shifted their attitudes towards communication skills and patient-centeredness. More research is needed to compare medical schools with and without longitudinal group mentorship programs to assess students' professional attitudes, and ideally, their performance in clinical practice.

医学生对沟通技巧和以病人为中心护理的态度:团体辅导的影响。
目的:探讨医学生在引入小组导师制新课程前后的临床实习准备情况、沟通技巧学习态度和以患者为中心的态度。方法:采用横断面问卷调查法(1-5 Likert量表)对五年级新课程第一班(NC, n = 51)和六年级旧课程最后班(OC, n = 48)进行调查。调查问卷包含了有关项目评估的问题,以及衡量学生对学习沟通技巧和以病人为中心的态度的陈述。采用描述性统计和Mann-Whitney u检验。结果:nc学生(Mdn=4)的得分显著高于oc学生(Mdn=3),当被问及他们认为前四年的医学课程如何为他们的临床实践做好准备时(U=828.5, p= 3)。003年,r = 0.35)。同样,nc学生对与患者沟通的准备程度更高(两组的Mdn=4, U=748.5)。结论:新课程中以小组为基础的指导计划显著提高了医学生自我评估的临床准备程度,并积极改变了他们对沟通技巧和以患者为中心的态度。需要更多的研究来比较有和没有纵向小组指导计划的医学院,以评估学生的专业态度,理想情况下,他们在临床实践中的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信