The Value of Texture Analysis of Multi-parameter MRI Images in Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Lesions of O-RADS MRI 4 Lesions.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/ijms.107452
Yan Lei, Hanzhou Tang, Lianlian Liu, Tingting Zheng, Yuan Zhang, Tong Chen, Junkang Shen, Bin Song
{"title":"The Value of Texture Analysis of Multi-parameter MRI Images in Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Lesions of O-RADS MRI 4 Lesions.","authors":"Yan Lei, Hanzhou Tang, Lianlian Liu, Tingting Zheng, Yuan Zhang, Tong Chen, Junkang Shen, Bin Song","doi":"10.7150/ijms.107452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To investigate the diagnostic performance of texture analysis using multi-parameter MRI in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions with ovarian-adnexal magnetic resonance imaging report and data system (O-RADS MRI) score 4. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted of 57 lesions with an O-RADS MRI score of 4, of which 26 were benign and 31 were malignant. Based on the T2WI, ADC, and CE_T1WI, the textural features of the entire lesion were extracted. The minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method was used to select features, and the random forest (RF) algorithm was used to construct four prediction models: T2WI, ADC, CE_T1WI, and the combined models. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to verify the model prediction performance, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the model performance, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). <b>Results:</b> 3474 texture features were extracted from the ADC, T2WI, and CE_T1WI images. ADC, T2WI, CE_T1WI, and combined models were constructed. Each model contained ten texture features. The AUC of the ADC, T2WI, CE_T1WI, and combined models were 0.749 (95% CI: 0.621-0.876), 0.671 (95% CI: 0.524-0.818), 0.786 (95% CI: 0.662-0.909), and 0.860 (95% CI: 0.76-0.959), respectively. The AUC of the combined model was significantly higher than those of the other three groups. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the combined model in distinguishing benign and malignant lesions with an O-RADS MRI score of 4 were 75.9%, 77.8%, 74.1%, 72.4%, and 79.3%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Texture analysis of multi-parameter MRI can improve the diagnostic efficiency of distinguishing benign and malignant lesions with an O-RADS MRI score of 4 and provide some help in clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 6","pages":"1425-1436"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.107452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the diagnostic performance of texture analysis using multi-parameter MRI in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions with ovarian-adnexal magnetic resonance imaging report and data system (O-RADS MRI) score 4. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 57 lesions with an O-RADS MRI score of 4, of which 26 were benign and 31 were malignant. Based on the T2WI, ADC, and CE_T1WI, the textural features of the entire lesion were extracted. The minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method was used to select features, and the random forest (RF) algorithm was used to construct four prediction models: T2WI, ADC, CE_T1WI, and the combined models. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to verify the model prediction performance, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the model performance, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: 3474 texture features were extracted from the ADC, T2WI, and CE_T1WI images. ADC, T2WI, CE_T1WI, and combined models were constructed. Each model contained ten texture features. The AUC of the ADC, T2WI, CE_T1WI, and combined models were 0.749 (95% CI: 0.621-0.876), 0.671 (95% CI: 0.524-0.818), 0.786 (95% CI: 0.662-0.909), and 0.860 (95% CI: 0.76-0.959), respectively. The AUC of the combined model was significantly higher than those of the other three groups. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the combined model in distinguishing benign and malignant lesions with an O-RADS MRI score of 4 were 75.9%, 77.8%, 74.1%, 72.4%, and 79.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Texture analysis of multi-parameter MRI can improve the diagnostic efficiency of distinguishing benign and malignant lesions with an O-RADS MRI score of 4 and provide some help in clinical decision-making.

多参数MRI图像纹理分析在O-RADS MRI 4病变良恶性鉴别中的价值
目的:探讨多参数MRI织构分析在卵巢-附件磁共振成像报告和数据系统(O-RADS MRI)评分为4分的良恶性病变鉴别中的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析57例O-RADS MRI评分为4分的病变,其中良性26例,恶性31例。基于T2WI、ADC、CE_T1WI提取整个病变的纹理特征。采用最小冗余最大相关性(mRMR)方法选择特征,采用随机森林(RF)算法构建T2WI、ADC、CE_T1WI和组合模型4种预测模型。采用十重交叉验证验证模型预测性能,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评价模型性能,包括曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)。结果:从ADC、T2WI和CE_T1WI图像中提取了3474个纹理特征。构建ADC、T2WI、CE_T1WI及联合模型。每个模型包含十个纹理特征。ADC、T2WI、CE_T1WI及联合模型的AUC分别为0.749 (95% CI: 0.621-0.876)、0.671 (95% CI: 0.524-0.818)、0.786 (95% CI: 0.662-0.909)、0.860 (95% CI: 0.76-0.959)。联合模型的AUC显著高于其他三组。在O-RADS MRI评分为4分时,联合模型鉴别良恶性病变的准确率为75.9%,灵敏度为77.8%,特异性为74.1%,PPV为72.4%,NPV为79.3%。结论:多参数MRI纹理分析可提高O-RADS评分为4分的MRI良恶性病变的诊断效率,为临床决策提供一定帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信