Conceptualizing green finance: Findings from textual and network analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Heliyon Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42785
Karambir Singh Dhayal, Srijan Shashwat, Arun Kumar Giri
{"title":"Conceptualizing green finance: Findings from textual and network analysis.","authors":"Karambir Singh Dhayal, Srijan Shashwat, Arun Kumar Giri","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Green finance has seen increased attention from academic researchers and policymakers due to its relevance in mitigating climate change and achieving environmental sustainability goals. Despite the exponential rise in its research publications and policy articles, there remains a lack of uniformity in the scholarly understanding of green finance. The lack of proper understanding and fragmented definitions further impede this domain's theoretical and practical advancements. Thus, it brings much subjectivity to green finance research as it becomes manipulated through different definitions. The current study addresses this significant research gap by systematically analyzing 126 green finance definitions sourced from research articles and different organizational reports of international repute. Through advanced textual analysis, co-word network analysis, and topic modelling through latent dirichlet allocation, the present study identifies the key dimensions of green finance and their interrelationships, culminating in a better understanding of these definitions. The study findings reveal ten core dimensions: environmental, sustainability, energy, finance, economic, institutional, technology, green, societal and sectoral, highlighting their centrality in shaping the existing green finance research definitions. The present study makes a significant critical contribution to advance the scholarly discourse on green finance by providing a strong foundation through the data-driven analysis of the existing definitions. It has significant practical implications, offering a standardized conceptual framework that policymakers, financial institutions, and international organizations can adopt to design sustainable financial products, align regulatory frameworks, and foster global collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12894,"journal":{"name":"Heliyon","volume":"11 4","pages":"e42785"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heliyon","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green finance has seen increased attention from academic researchers and policymakers due to its relevance in mitigating climate change and achieving environmental sustainability goals. Despite the exponential rise in its research publications and policy articles, there remains a lack of uniformity in the scholarly understanding of green finance. The lack of proper understanding and fragmented definitions further impede this domain's theoretical and practical advancements. Thus, it brings much subjectivity to green finance research as it becomes manipulated through different definitions. The current study addresses this significant research gap by systematically analyzing 126 green finance definitions sourced from research articles and different organizational reports of international repute. Through advanced textual analysis, co-word network analysis, and topic modelling through latent dirichlet allocation, the present study identifies the key dimensions of green finance and their interrelationships, culminating in a better understanding of these definitions. The study findings reveal ten core dimensions: environmental, sustainability, energy, finance, economic, institutional, technology, green, societal and sectoral, highlighting their centrality in shaping the existing green finance research definitions. The present study makes a significant critical contribution to advance the scholarly discourse on green finance by providing a strong foundation through the data-driven analysis of the existing definitions. It has significant practical implications, offering a standardized conceptual framework that policymakers, financial institutions, and international organizations can adopt to design sustainable financial products, align regulatory frameworks, and foster global collaboration.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heliyon
Heliyon MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
2793
期刊介绍: Heliyon is an all-science, open access journal that is part of the Cell Press family. Any paper reporting scientifically accurate and valuable research, which adheres to accepted ethical and scientific publishing standards, will be considered for publication. Our growing team of dedicated section editors, along with our in-house team, handle your paper and manage the publication process end-to-end, giving your research the editorial support it deserves.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信