Machine learning, clinical-radiomics approach with HIM for hemorrhagic transformation prediction after thrombectomy and treatment.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1471274
Sheng Hu, Junyu Liu, Jiayi Hong, Yuting Chen, Ziwen Wang, Jibo Hu, Shiying Gai, Xiaochao Yu, Jingjing Fu
{"title":"Machine learning, clinical-radiomics approach with HIM for hemorrhagic transformation prediction after thrombectomy and treatment.","authors":"Sheng Hu, Junyu Liu, Jiayi Hong, Yuting Chen, Ziwen Wang, Jibo Hu, Shiying Gai, Xiaochao Yu, Jingjing Fu","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1471274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to develop a clinical-radiomics model using hyperattenuated imaging markers (HIM), characterized by hyperattenuation on head non-contrast computed tomography immediately after thrombectomy, to predict the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) in patients undergoing endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 159 consecutive patients with HIM were screened immediately after MT for inclusion. The datasets were randomly divided into training and test cohorts at a ratio of 8:2. An optimal machine learning (ML) algorithm was used for model development. Subsequently, models for clinical, radiomics, and clinical-radiomics were developed. The performance of the models was measured using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analyses (DCA). The interpretability and predictor importance of the model were analyzed using Shapley additive explanations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 159 patients, 100 (62.9%) exhibited HT. The support vector machine (SVM) was the optimal ML algorithm for constructing the models. In predicting HT, the areas under the curve (AUCs) of the clinical model were 0.918 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.869-0.966) in the training cohort and 0.854 (95% CI = 0.724-0.984) in the test cohort. The AUCs of the radiomics model were 0.869 (95% CI = 0.802-0.936) and 0.829 (95% CI = 0.668-0.990), while those of the clinical-radiomics model were 0.944 (95% CI = 0.905-0.984) and 0.925 (95% CI = 0.832-1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The suggested clinical-radiomics model based on HIM is a reliable method that can provide a risk evaluation of HT in individuals undergoing MT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1471274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1471274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to develop a clinical-radiomics model using hyperattenuated imaging markers (HIM), characterized by hyperattenuation on head non-contrast computed tomography immediately after thrombectomy, to predict the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) in patients undergoing endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

Methods: A total of 159 consecutive patients with HIM were screened immediately after MT for inclusion. The datasets were randomly divided into training and test cohorts at a ratio of 8:2. An optimal machine learning (ML) algorithm was used for model development. Subsequently, models for clinical, radiomics, and clinical-radiomics were developed. The performance of the models was measured using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analyses (DCA). The interpretability and predictor importance of the model were analyzed using Shapley additive explanations.

Results: Of the 159 patients, 100 (62.9%) exhibited HT. The support vector machine (SVM) was the optimal ML algorithm for constructing the models. In predicting HT, the areas under the curve (AUCs) of the clinical model were 0.918 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.869-0.966) in the training cohort and 0.854 (95% CI = 0.724-0.984) in the test cohort. The AUCs of the radiomics model were 0.869 (95% CI = 0.802-0.936) and 0.829 (95% CI = 0.668-0.990), while those of the clinical-radiomics model were 0.944 (95% CI = 0.905-0.984) and 0.925 (95% CI = 0.832-1.000).

Conclusion: The suggested clinical-radiomics model based on HIM is a reliable method that can provide a risk evaluation of HT in individuals undergoing MT.

研究背景本研究旨在建立一个临床放射组学模型,利用高衰减成像标志物(HIM)预测接受血管内机械血栓切除术(MT)患者发生出血转化(HT)的风险:方法:共筛选了 159 名连续的 HIM 患者,将其纳入 MT 术后即时数据集。数据集按 8:2 的比例随机分为训练组和测试组。使用最佳机器学习(ML)算法开发模型。随后,开发了临床、放射组学和临床放射组学模型。模型的性能通过接收者操作特征(ROC)和决策曲线分析(DCA)进行测量。使用夏普利加法解释分析了模型的可解释性和预测因子的重要性:在 159 例患者中,100 例(62.9%)表现为 HT。支持向量机(SVM)是构建模型的最佳 ML 算法。在预测 HT 时,临床模型的曲线下面积(AUC)在训练队列中为 0.918(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 0.869-0.966),在测试队列中为 0.854(95% CI = 0.724-0.984)。放射组学模型的AUC为0.869(95% CI = 0.802-0.936)和0.829(95% CI = 0.668-0.990),而临床放射组学模型的AUC为0.944(95% CI = 0.905-0.984)和0.925(95% CI = 0.832-1.000):结论:基于 HIM 的临床-放射组学模型是一种可靠的方法,可对接受 MT 的患者进行 HT 风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信