Mia J Gruzin, Matthew Hobbs, Rachel E Ellsworth, Sarah Poll, Sienna Aguilar, Jaysen Knezovich, Nicole Faulkner, Nick Olsen, Swaroop Aradhya, Leslie Burnett
{"title":"Optimizing Gene Panels for Equitable Reproductive Carrier Screening: the \"Goldilocks\" Approach.","authors":"Mia J Gruzin, Matthew Hobbs, Rachel E Ellsworth, Sarah Poll, Sienna Aguilar, Jaysen Knezovich, Nicole Faulkner, Nick Olsen, Swaroop Aradhya, Leslie Burnett","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2025.101387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional organizations recommend pan-ancestry carrier screening for autosomal recessive (AR) and X-linked (XL) conditions. Advances in DNA sequencing allow for analysis of hundreds of genes, but the optimal number of genes for carrier screening remains unclear. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) has proposed a tiered approach, recommending screening for 113 genes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed ClinVar and gnomAD v4.1.0 for genes associated with serious AR and XL conditions and modeled screening performance across panels of varying composition and size in diverse genetic ancestries. We also reevaluated the ACMG gene list using this updated gnomAD data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified potential inconsistencies in the ACMG gene lists, particularly in carrier test performance (which we define as positive yield) for underrepresented genetic ancestry groups. Modeling of population data for 1,310 genes revealed that screening 152, 248, 531 and 725 genes achieves 90%, 95%, 99% and 99.7% positive yield in couples, respectively. Real-world data from screening more than 60,000 couples validated our modeling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our methodology optimizes gene content for carrier screening panels for diverse ancestry groups, providing a mechanism to continually update guidelines, ensure consistency with genomic population data and improve equity across populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101387"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101387","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Professional organizations recommend pan-ancestry carrier screening for autosomal recessive (AR) and X-linked (XL) conditions. Advances in DNA sequencing allow for analysis of hundreds of genes, but the optimal number of genes for carrier screening remains unclear. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) has proposed a tiered approach, recommending screening for 113 genes.
Methods: We analyzed ClinVar and gnomAD v4.1.0 for genes associated with serious AR and XL conditions and modeled screening performance across panels of varying composition and size in diverse genetic ancestries. We also reevaluated the ACMG gene list using this updated gnomAD data.
Results: We identified potential inconsistencies in the ACMG gene lists, particularly in carrier test performance (which we define as positive yield) for underrepresented genetic ancestry groups. Modeling of population data for 1,310 genes revealed that screening 152, 248, 531 and 725 genes achieves 90%, 95%, 99% and 99.7% positive yield in couples, respectively. Real-world data from screening more than 60,000 couples validated our modeling.
Conclusion: Our methodology optimizes gene content for carrier screening panels for diverse ancestry groups, providing a mechanism to continually update guidelines, ensure consistency with genomic population data and improve equity across populations.
期刊介绍:
Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health.
GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.