Optimizing Gene Panels for Equitable Reproductive Carrier Screening: the "Goldilocks" Approach.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Mia J Gruzin, Matthew Hobbs, Rachel E Ellsworth, Sarah Poll, Sienna Aguilar, Jaysen Knezovich, Nicole Faulkner, Nick Olsen, Swaroop Aradhya, Leslie Burnett
{"title":"Optimizing Gene Panels for Equitable Reproductive Carrier Screening: the \"Goldilocks\" Approach.","authors":"Mia J Gruzin, Matthew Hobbs, Rachel E Ellsworth, Sarah Poll, Sienna Aguilar, Jaysen Knezovich, Nicole Faulkner, Nick Olsen, Swaroop Aradhya, Leslie Burnett","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2025.101387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional organizations recommend pan-ancestry carrier screening for autosomal recessive (AR) and X-linked (XL) conditions. Advances in DNA sequencing allow for analysis of hundreds of genes, but the optimal number of genes for carrier screening remains unclear. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) has proposed a tiered approach, recommending screening for 113 genes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed ClinVar and gnomAD v4.1.0 for genes associated with serious AR and XL conditions and modeled screening performance across panels of varying composition and size in diverse genetic ancestries. We also reevaluated the ACMG gene list using this updated gnomAD data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified potential inconsistencies in the ACMG gene lists, particularly in carrier test performance (which we define as positive yield) for underrepresented genetic ancestry groups. Modeling of population data for 1,310 genes revealed that screening 152, 248, 531 and 725 genes achieves 90%, 95%, 99% and 99.7% positive yield in couples, respectively. Real-world data from screening more than 60,000 couples validated our modeling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our methodology optimizes gene content for carrier screening panels for diverse ancestry groups, providing a mechanism to continually update guidelines, ensure consistency with genomic population data and improve equity across populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101387"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101387","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Professional organizations recommend pan-ancestry carrier screening for autosomal recessive (AR) and X-linked (XL) conditions. Advances in DNA sequencing allow for analysis of hundreds of genes, but the optimal number of genes for carrier screening remains unclear. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) has proposed a tiered approach, recommending screening for 113 genes.

Methods: We analyzed ClinVar and gnomAD v4.1.0 for genes associated with serious AR and XL conditions and modeled screening performance across panels of varying composition and size in diverse genetic ancestries. We also reevaluated the ACMG gene list using this updated gnomAD data.

Results: We identified potential inconsistencies in the ACMG gene lists, particularly in carrier test performance (which we define as positive yield) for underrepresented genetic ancestry groups. Modeling of population data for 1,310 genes revealed that screening 152, 248, 531 and 725 genes achieves 90%, 95%, 99% and 99.7% positive yield in couples, respectively. Real-world data from screening more than 60,000 couples validated our modeling.

Conclusion: Our methodology optimizes gene content for carrier screening panels for diverse ancestry groups, providing a mechanism to continually update guidelines, ensure consistency with genomic population data and improve equity across populations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信