Oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer after progression with CDK4/6 inhibitors.
{"title":"Oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer after progression with CDK4/6 inhibitors.","authors":"Taha Koray Sahin, Sercan Aksoy, Deniz Can Guven","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2479604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains a prevalent and challenging disease. Endocrine therapy (ET) combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors is the first-line standard of care, yet resistance mechanisms, including ESR1 mutations, drive disease progression. Novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) have emerged as promising therapeutic agents after progression with CDK4/6 inhibitors secondary to ESR1 mutations. However, the available studies on SERDs differ in design, study population, and outcomes, necessitating a critical review of available data.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review explores the mechanisms, clinical efficacy, and safety profiles of oral SERDs in HR-positive, HER2-negative mBC, particularly following progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors. Recent key clinical trials, including EMERALD, SERENA-2, EMBER-3 and AMEERA-3, are analyzed, highlighting their efficacy in overcoming resistance, especially in ESR1-mutant populations.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Oral SERDs offer enhanced bioavailability and convenience compared to fulvestrant, representing a critical advancement in endocrine therapy. Their integration into treatment strategies, particularly in combination regimens and ctDNA-driven approaches, may improve patient outcomes and address resistance mechanisms. However, other than ESR1 mutations, clinical refinement for patient selection is limited. Further trials are needed to optimize patient selection for oral SERD use and define the most effective combination strategies with oral SERDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2479604","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains a prevalent and challenging disease. Endocrine therapy (ET) combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors is the first-line standard of care, yet resistance mechanisms, including ESR1 mutations, drive disease progression. Novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) have emerged as promising therapeutic agents after progression with CDK4/6 inhibitors secondary to ESR1 mutations. However, the available studies on SERDs differ in design, study population, and outcomes, necessitating a critical review of available data.
Areas covered: This review explores the mechanisms, clinical efficacy, and safety profiles of oral SERDs in HR-positive, HER2-negative mBC, particularly following progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors. Recent key clinical trials, including EMERALD, SERENA-2, EMBER-3 and AMEERA-3, are analyzed, highlighting their efficacy in overcoming resistance, especially in ESR1-mutant populations.
Expert opinion: Oral SERDs offer enhanced bioavailability and convenience compared to fulvestrant, representing a critical advancement in endocrine therapy. Their integration into treatment strategies, particularly in combination regimens and ctDNA-driven approaches, may improve patient outcomes and address resistance mechanisms. However, other than ESR1 mutations, clinical refinement for patient selection is limited. Further trials are needed to optimize patient selection for oral SERD use and define the most effective combination strategies with oral SERDs.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.